This paper provides a contextual and historical backdrop for this special edition by
exploring cross-sectoral debates about the potential impacts of the GATS
negotiations and their place within the broader political economy of North-South
relations. It traces the historical background to the negotiations as part of the
formation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 and assesses some of the major
controversies that have arisen over the likely impacts of GATS upon the interests of
Southern countries. It then goes on to consider the specfic issues involved in the
regulation of international trade in services and outline how the GATS is supposed
to operate, before briefly outlining some of the major controversies that have
arisen over the likely impacts of the GATS process upon the interests of Southern
countries.
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC). 2005:
“Statement on WTO GATS Mode 4 Negotiations,”http://www.afsc.org/trade-matters/issues/GATS-Mode-4-Statement.htm.
Last accessed 24/01/2008.
2.
Bardeleben, M.
and
Barry, C.2003:
Privatization and GATS: A Threat to Development?Report from a workshop cosponsored by the Carnegie Council and the Friedrich
Ebert Stiftung, with the cooperation of the UN Financing for Development
Office (DESA).
http://www.cceia.org/viewMedia.php/prmTemplateID/8/prmID/1016.
Last accessed 17/10/2006.
3.
Bello, W.2002: Power, transparency and democracy: the challenge of the
multilateral institutions. Retrieved 14 October 2005 from
http://www.pcij.org/accessinfo/bello.html
4.
Bjorvatn, K.
and
Søreide, T.2003: Corruption and market reform. Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration (NHH) and Chr. Michelsen
Institute (CMI).
http://www.nhh.no/sam/res&publ/2003/06.pdf.
Last accessed 12/10/2006.
5.
Brown, E.2002 “Movement of Natural Persons (Mode
4) Under GATS: The Jamaican Experience with the Movement of Natural
Persons in the Provision of Services,”
HEARTTrust/NTA Kingston, Jamaica April 2002http://www.revistainterforum.com/english/worwebdoc/brown_e_paper.htm.
Last accessed 24/01/2008.
6.
Chang, H.2003:
The future for trade
. Challenge46,
6–15
.
7.
Cheng, T.2001:
GATS: Pushing for Fairness
. AP Consumer24,
15–16
.
8.
Cleetus, R.2004:
Trade liberalization, rural poverty and the environment: a wide-ranging
review of the debates
. Trade Liberalization, Rural Poverty and the Environment Project,
Macroeconomics for Sustainable Development Program Office, WWF.
Retrieved 9 September 2005 from
http://www.panda.org/downloads/policy/tpeliteraturereviewnov17.pdf
9.
CNIS – the Commonwealth News and Information Service2005: Issue 222, 16 February 2005. Retrieved 20 October 2005
from
http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/System/LatestNews.asp?NodeID=142599
10.
Daly, H.1996: Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development.
Beacon Press.
11.
Daly M.
and
Kuwahara H.1998:
The impact of the Uruguay round on tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade
in the ‘Quad.The World Economy21,
143–284
.
12.
Das, B.L.1999: The World Trade Organisation: a guide to the new framework for
international trade.
Zed Books
.
13.
Davis, D.
and
Weinstein, D.2002:
What role for empirics in international trade?Columbia University Department of Economics, Discussion Paper No.
0102–05. Retrieved 11 September 2005 from
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/economics/discpapr/DP0102-05.pdf
14.
Deardorff, A.1996:
An economist's overview of the World Trade Organization
. Research Seminar in International Economics, School of Public
Policy, University of Michigan: Discussion Paper No. 388. Retrieved 17
October 2005 from
http://www.fordschool.umich.edu/research/rsie/workingpapers/Papers376-400/r388.pdf
15.
Department of Trade and Industry website on GATS. Retrieved 20 August
2006 from
http://www.dti.gov.uk/europeandtrade/key-trade-issues/services-gats/gats_faqs/page28785
16.
Dirlik, A.2004:
Spectres of the Third World: global modernity and the end of the three
worlds
. Third World Quarterly25,
131–48
.
17.
Elliott, L.
,
Denny, C.
and
Munk, D.2003:
Blow to world economy as trade talks collapse
. The Guardian Monday 15 September 2003.
18.
Esty, S.1994:
Greening the GATT: trade, environment and future
. Institute for International Economics.
19.
Friends of the Earth. 2002:
GATS primer: understanding the WTO General Agreement on Trade in
Services
. Retrieved 12 September 2005 from
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/gats_primer.pdf
20.
Hall, D.1999:
“Privatisation, multinationals, and corruption,”Development in Practice9(5), November.
21.
Herbert, Y.2004:
Divide and conquer: bilateral trade agreements.Dominion, 6 April 2004. Retrieved 17 October 2005 from
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wto/2004/0406divide.htm
22.
Howse, R.
(nd) How to Begin to Think About the
“Democratic Deficit” at the WTO. Retrieved 17 October
2005 from
http://faculty.law.umich.edu/rhowse/Drafts_and_Publications/howse7.pdf
23.
ICTSD/IISD. 2003:
‘The Singapore Issues: Investment, Competition Policy,
Transparency in Government Procurement and Trade
Facilitation’.Doha Round Briefing Series.
Geneva: ICTSD/IISD
.
24.
International Forum on Globalization. 2005: WTO Agreement on
Agriculture: Threat to. Available online at
www.ifg.org/pdf/cancun/issues-foodsecurity.pdf.
Last accessed 24/01/08.
25.
International Forum on Globalization. 2005: WTO food and
agriculture rules: briefing on critical issues.
The Centre For Food Safety,
Washington
.
http://www.ifg.org/pdf/int%27l_trade-W=_food_&_ag_ru.pdf.
Last accessed on 24/01/08.
26.
International Monetary Fund. 2001: Global trade liberalization
and the developing countries. Retrieved 10 October 2005 from
http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2001/110801.htm
27.
Javalgi, R.
and
White, D.2002:
Strategic challenges for the marketing of services internationally
. International Marketing Review19,
563–81
.
28.
Kaplinsky, R.2005:
Revisiting the revisisted terms of trade: will China make a
difference
. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, and
Centre for Research in Innovation Management, University of Brighton.
Retrieved 17 July 2006 from
http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/global/AsianDriverpdfs/RKTOTChina05.pdf
29.
Keen, S.2003: Globalisation and free trade: Big Brother in disguise and the
weakest link. Retrieved 9 September 2005 from
http://www.debunking-economics.com/index.htm#Book%20structure
30.
Kennan, J.
and
Stevens, C.1997: From Lomé to the GSP: implications for the ACP of
losing Lomé trade preferences. Institute of Development
Studies. Retrieved 22 October 2005 from
http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/global/pdfs/lomeox.pdf
31.
Keet, D.2005: Why SA needs to oppose GATS, Business Report,
Johannesburg, 8 December 2005.
http://www.focusweb.org/content/view/737/55/
Last accessed 24/01/2008.
32.
Kikeri, S.
and
Nellis, J.
(2001): Privatization in competitive
sectors: The record so far.
World Bank, Private Sector Advisory Services,
Washington DC
.
33.
Koivusalo, M.2003:
The impact of WTO agreements on health and development policies
. Globalism and Social Policy Programme (GASPP)
Policy Briefs No. 3, STAKES, Helsinki.
34.
McGuire, S.2002: Trade in services – market access opportunities
and the benefits of liberalization for developing countries.
Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodity Study Series
No.19, UNCTAD, UNCTAD/ITCD/TAB/20. Retrieved 15 September
2005 from
http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/itcdtab20_en.pdf
35.
McMichael, P.2000:
Sleepless since Seattle: what is the WTO about?Review of International Political Economy7,
466–74
.
36.
Mohan, G.
,
Brown, E.
,
Milward, B.
and
Zack-Williams, T.2000: Structural adjustment: theory, practice and impacts.
Routledge
.
37.
Mold, A.2004:
Trade preferences and Africa – the state of play and the issues
at stake
. Economic Commission for Africa. Retrieved 17 October 2005
from
http://www.uneca.org/eca_programmes/trade_and_regional_integration/meetings/TunisNovember2004/African%20trade%20and%20preferences%20%20Tunsia%20version.pdf
38.
Nederveen Pieterse, J.2004:
Towards democratic globalization: To WTO or not to WTO?Development and Change35,
1057–63
.
39.
Ocampo, J.
and
Parra, M.2004:
The commodity terms of trade and their strategic implications for
development
. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
(ECLA). Retrieved 7 October 2005 from
http://ideas.repec.org/cgibin/get_doc.pl?urn=RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0403001&url=http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/it/papers/0403/0403001.pdf
40.
Ostry, S.2000:
The Uruguay round north-south grand bargain: implications for future
negotiations
. The Political Economy of International Trade Law, University
of Minnesota, September, 2000. Retrieved 18 October 2005 from
http://www.utoronto.ca/cis/ostry/docs_pdf/Minnesota.pdf
41.
Ozden, C.
and
Reinhardt, E.2003:
The perversity of preferences: GSP and developing country trade policies,
1976–2000
. World Bank Working Paper No. 2955. Retrieved 12 October
2005 from
http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2003/02/07/000094946_03012511205071/additional/109509322_20041117164020.pdf
42.
Page, S.2003:
Developing countries: victims or participants their changing role in
international negotiations
. Overseas Development Institute: Globalization and poverty
programme. Retrieved 16 October 2005 from
http://www.odi.org.uk/iedg/publications/dev_countries_web.pdf
43.
Palley, T.2003:
After Cancun: possibilities for a new north-south grand bargain on
trade
. Foreign Policy in Focus Policy Report, November 2003.
Retrieved 17 September 2005 from
http://www.fpif.org/papers/cancun2003.html
44.
Peck, J.2004:
Geography and public policy: constructions of neoliberalism
. Progress in Human Geography2,
392–405
.
45.
Primo Braga, C.
and
Brokhaug, K.2005:
Services and the Doha Development Agenda
. Paper produced for the Working Group on Trade of the
Parliamentary Network on the World Bank (PNoWB).
Retrieved 2 November 2005 from
http://resources.worldbank.org/EXTPARLIAMENTARIANS/Resources/Services_brief_for_PNoWB-final.pdf
46.
Ram, R.2004:
Trends in developing countries’ commodity terms-of-trade since
1970
. Review of Radical Political Economics36,
241–53
.
47.
Ribeira, G.2005: Power, networks and ideology in the field of
development. Department of Anthropology, University of Brasilia, Serie
Antropologia no. 378. Retrieved 15 October 2005 from
http://www.unb.br/ics/dan/Serie378empdf.pdf
48.
Sands, O.2004 “Temporary Movement of Labor Fuels GATS
Debate,” Center for Strategic and International
Studies.
http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=231.
Last accessed 24/01/2008.
49.
Short, C.2001: Secretary of State for International Development, Written
Answers to Questions, Hansard 9 Jan 2001. Retrieved 15 September 2005 from
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200001/cmhansrd/vo010109/text/10109w01.htm
50.
Simon, D.2003:
Dilemmas of development and the environment in a globalising world: theory,
policy and praxis
. Progress in Development Studies3,
5–41
.
51.
Sinclair, S.2000: GATS: How the WTO's new
“services” negotiations threaten democracy. Available
on
http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/GATSsummary.html.Lastaccessed24/01/08.
52.
Sinclair, S.
and
Grieshaber-Otto.2002:
Facing the facts: a guide to the GATS debate
. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved 3 July
2005 from
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/index.cfm?act=news&do=Article&call=336&pA=BB736455
53.
Srinivasan, T.
and
Bhagwati, J.1999:
Outward orientation and development: are the revisionists
right?Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 806,
1999.
54.
Taylor, P.2000:
World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary
globalization II: looking forward, looking ahead
. GeoJournal52,
157–62
.
55.
The South Centre. 2004: “
Strengthening Developing Countries’ Capacity for Trade
Negotiations: Matching Technical Assistance to Negotiating Capacity
Constraints
.” Paper prepared for the Group of 77.
http://www.southcentre.org/publications/doha/doha_strengthening_southern_traderelated_negotiating_capacity.pdf.Lastaccessed05/09/2006.
56.
UNCTAD. 2004: Trade preferences for LDCs: An early assessment
of benefits and possible improvements.
UNCTAD: Geneva
.
57.
Wallach, L.
(2005) “Backgrounder on WTO
service sector: Liberalization and deregulation,” produced
for Public Citizen.
http://www.citizen.org/documents/PC_Gats_Backgrounder_05-05.pdf.
Last accessed 24/01/2008.
58.
Weisbrot, M.
and
Baker, D.2002:
The relative impact of trade liberalization on developing countries
. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved 11
October 2005 from
http://www.cepr.net/publications/trade_2002_06_12.htm
59.
Wesselius, E.2003: Driving the GATS Juggernaut, Red Pepper January,
2003.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wto/2003/01gats.htm.
Last accessed on 24/01/08.
60.
Whalley, J.2004:
Assessing the benefits to developing countries of liberalisation in
services trade
. The World Economy27,
1223–53
.
61.
Winham, G.1998:
The World Trade Organization: institution-building in the multilateral
trade system
. The World Economy21,
349–68
.
62.
Winters, A.
,
McCulloch, N.
and
McKay, A.2004: Trade liberalization and poverty: the evidence so far. Journal
of Economic LiteratureXLII,
72–115
.
63.
Woodroffe, R.
and
Joy, C.2002: Out of service: the development dangers of the general
agreement on trade in services. World Development Movement. Retrieved 13
March 2005 from http://www.wdm.org.uk
64.
World Bank. 2002: Global Economic Prospects and the
Developing Countries: making trade work for the world's poor.
World Bank.
65.
World Development Movement (WDM). 2001: GATS
Campaign April 2001 WDM's summary response to the World Trade
Organisation document “GATS – Fact and
Fiction”.
http://www.wdm.org.uk/campaigns/cambriefs/wto/factfictionrebuttal.htm.
Last accessed 02/09/2006.
66.
World Development Movement 2002a: GATS: A Disservice to the
Poor.
London: World Development Movement
.
67.
World Development Movement 2002b: Out of service: The
development dangers of the General Agreement on Trade in Services.
London: World Development Movement
.
68.
World Development Movement 2003: The Cancun democracy
challenge. Retrieved 20 October 2005 from
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wto/2003/07democracychallenge.htm
69.
World Development Movement (WDM). 2003b:
Press release: Leaked documents reveal UK Government hypocrisy over trade
agreement danger. Activists post confidential EU trade demands on web.
http://www.wdm.org.uk/news/presrel/current/109gatsleak.htm.
Last accessed 17/10/2006.
70.
World Trade Organization (WTO). nd: GATS Training
Module. Retrieved 3 July 2005 from
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/cbt_course_e/signin_e.htm
71.
WTO. 1991: Services sectoral classification list: note by the
secretariat. Retrieved 3 July 2005 from
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/mtn_gns_w_120_e.doc
72.
WTO. 2001: Doha Ministerial Declaration, Retrieved 17
October 2005 from
http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm
73.
WTO. 2005a: GATS Misunderstandings and scare stories: Is
dispute settlement a threat to democracy? FACT AND FICTION.
World Trade Organization Website. Retrieved 9 September 2005 from
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gats_factfiction12_e.htm
74.
WTO. 2005b: A summary of the final act of the Uruguay
round,
Legal texts: the WTO agreements, WTO
. Retrieved 12 September 2005 from
http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ursum_e.htm#
Agreement
75.
Young, B.
and
Hoppe, H.2003:
The Doha Development Round: gender and social reproduction
. Dialogue on Globalization, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Occasional
papers, No. 7. Retrieved 4 July 2005 from
http://www.womnet.de/content/upload/FES%20OccPapers7.pdf
