This research examines Singaporean newspapers’ coverage of Chinese migrant workers and contributes to the study of media representation of migrant workers within the context of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). A critical discourse analysis was conducted on 207 news articles published between 2013 and 2025 in leading Singaporean newspapers, focusing on the discursive representations of Chinese migrant workers. The analysis included articles from The Straits Times (English) and Lianhe Zaobao (Chinese), the two most prominent newspapers in Singapore. Media portrayals of Chinese migrant workers have become increasingly diverse, reflecting a broad range of topic categories. The representation of this group primarily falls into four types: vulnerable workforce, outsiders, precarious workforce, and hardworking contributors. These findings reveal the social perceptions, ideology, and media stance toward Chinese migrant workers in Singapore.
AhmedSChenVHHChibAI (2021) Xenophobia in the time of a pandemic: social media use, stereotypes, and prejudice against immigrants during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research33(3): 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab014
2.
AngS (2021) Chinese migrant women as boundary markers in Singapore: unrespectable, un-middle-class and un-Chinese. Mobilities16(2): 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1885835
3.
AngSColic-PeiskerV (2022) Sinophobia in the Asian century: race, nation and othering in Australia and Singapore. Ethnic and Racial Studies45(4): 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1921236
4.
AssimakopoulosSMuskatRV (2017) Exploring xenophobic and homophobic attitudes in Malta: linking the perception of social practice with textual analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics13(2): 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0010
5.
BélangerDWangHZ (2013) Transnationalism from below: evidence from Vietnam-Taiwan cross-border marriages. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal22(2): 191–216.
6.
BellA (1998) The discourse structure of news stories. In: BellAGarrettP (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 64–104.
7.
Bork-HüfferTYeohBSA (2017) The geographies of difference in conflating digital and offline spaces of encounter: migrant professionals’ throwntogetherness in Singapore. Geoforum86: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.002
8.
BräutigamD (2020) A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ in Southeast Asia. The China Quarterly242: 366–389.
9.
CaiMXAhmedSIbascoGC, et al. (2024) Two sides of a coin: understanding social media use and its relationships to online perceived discrimination and life satisfaction. Asian Journal of Communication34(6): 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2024.2398477
10.
Caldas-CoulthardCR (2003) Cross-cultural representation of ‘otherness’ in media discourse. In: WeissGWodakR (eds) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 272–296.
CernaLChouMH (2023) Talent migration governance and the COVID-19 pandemic: comparing Germany and Singapore. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies21(1): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2128494
13.
ChiangLHNYeohBSA (2018) Transnational labour migration, remittances and the changing family in Asia. Geoforum89: 116–125.
14.
DobuschLKreisslK (2020) Privilege and burden of im-/mobility governance: the reinforcement of inequalities during a pandemic lockdown. Gender, Work and Organization27(5): 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12462
15.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
16.
FaircloughN (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge.
17.
FaircloughN (1995b) Media Discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.
18.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
GuerreroGRTorres-OlaveB (2022) Scientiffc literacy and agency within the Chilean science curriculum. The Curriculum Journal33(3): 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.141
24.
HallidayMAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. Edward Arnold.
25.
HugoG (2014) Migration and development in Southeast Asia. Journal of International Migration and Integration15(2): 125–156.
26.
JørgensenMWPhillipsL (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Sage Publications.
27.
LiXYEnglishASKulichSJ (2021) Anger among Chinese migrants amid COVID-19 discrimination: The role of host news coverage, cultural distance, and national identity. Plos One16(11): e0259866. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259866
28.
LinWYeohBSA (2020) Pathological (im)mobilities: managing risk in a time of pandemics. Mobilities16(1): 96–112.
MelissaYLeeS (2023) ‘China doll snatched away my husband’: the intersectional othering of Chinese migrant women in a Malaysian newspaper. Discourse Context & Media54: 1–10.
31.
ParkYJ (2013) Perceptions of Chinese in Southern Africa: Constructions of the “other” and the role of memory. African Studies Review56(1): 131–153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002020613000097
32.
PethSASterlyHSakdapolrakP (2018) Between the village and the global city: the production and decay of translocal spaces of Thai migrant workers in Singapore. Mobilities13(4): 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1449785
SunWN (2024) Chinese-Australians, media consumption, and the politics of belonging. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies38(6): 895–914. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2024.2439993
35.
SuryadinataL (2017) The Rise of China and the Chinese Overseas: A Study of Beijing’s Changing Policy in Southeast Asia and Beyond. ISEAS Publishing.
36.
TodorovT (1984) The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other (R. Howard, Trans.). Harper & Row.
37.
Van DijkTA (1991) Racism and the Press. Routledge.
Van DijkTA (2009) Critical discourse studies: a sociocognitive approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications, pp. 62–86.
40.
WangSMChenXBLiY, et al. (2021) ‘I’m more afraid of racism than of the virus!’: racism awareness and resistance among Chinese migrants and their descendants in France during the Covid-19 pandemic. European Societies23(S1): S721–S742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1836384
41.
WodakR (2011) Discursive Pragmatics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
42.
WodakRMeyerM (2009) Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis2(1): 1–33.
43.
WongD (1997) Transience and settlement: Singapore’s foreign labor policy. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal: APMJ6(2): 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719689700600201
44.
YangWYeohBSALamT, et al. (2025) Transnational citizenship pathways of Chinese professional migrants in Singapore: negotiating provisionality, permanence, and emerging precarity in (post-)pandemic times. Citizenship Studies28(6): 1–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2025.2606714
YeohBSA (2020) Temporary Migration Regimes and their Sustainability in Times of COVID-19. International Organization for Migration (IOM).
47.
YeohBSALinW (2013) Chinese migration to Singapore: discourses and discontents in a globalizing nation-state. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal22(1): 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719681302200103
48.
ZhanXLiX (2012) The media representations of disadvantaged groups: the case of “urban freaks” migrant workers. Contemporary Communication6: 39–41.
49.
ZhouMLiuH (2016) Homeland engagement and host-society integration: a comparative study of new Chinese immigrants in the United States and Singapore. International Migration Review50(2): 326–354.
