Same disaster,different witnesses: The impact of journalistic cultures on the Chinese and U.S. media’s reporting on the 2023 Turkey

Abstract

The journalistic witnessing of disasters transcends objective reporting, reflecting specific emotions and perceptions within a certain society. This article examines how journalistic cultures in China and the U.S. shaped media discourses on the Turkey–Syria earthquake. Through multimodal analysis and critical discourse analysis, we find that China Central Television (CCTV), as a propaganda tool, focused on Chinese benefactors amid scenes of suffering, namely the efforts of Chinese rescue teams, thus emphasizing China’s growing presence in humanitarian settings and its international influence and strength. In contrast, Cable News Network’s (CNN’s) coverage, which was informed by the American news culture of objectivity, portrayed the disaster via the suffering of distant others, directly portraying the victims’ pain and featuring studio anchors and experts as detached observers analyzing the disaster’s broader impact. These differences reveal contrasting national approaches to international humanitarianism: the U.S. frames distant suffering within a liberal humanitarian imaginary that emphasizes moral obligation, while China constructs a narrative of benevolent power to legitimize its emerging role in global humanitarianism.

Keywords

Analytics of mediation disaster news journalistic culture journalistic witnessing humanitarian communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldamen

Hacimic

(2023) Positive determinism of Twitter usage development in crisis communication: rescue and relief efforts after the 6 February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye as a case study. Social Sciences 12(8): 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080436

Alexander

(2003) Introduction: the meanings of (social) life: on the origins of a cultural sociology. In: Alexander

(ed) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–10.

Archetti

(2010) Explaining News: National Politics and Journalistic Cultures in Global Context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Boltanski

(1999) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boon

(2022) International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American other. European Journal of International Relations 28(4): 808–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221117029

Broersma

(2010) Journalism as performative discourse. The importance of form and style in journalism. In: Rupar

(ed) Journalism and Meaning-making: Reading the Newspaper. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 15–35.

Callaghan

Schnell

(eds) (2005) Framing American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

CCTV (2023a) CCTV reporters rushed to disaster areas to cover on-site rescue efforts. Available at: https://tv.cctv.com/2023/02/11/VIDE4lzoAAw7eaGwZVswrSAf230211.shtml (accessed 10 February 2024).

CCTV (2023b) Severe disaster in Aleppo, unknown number buried. Available at: https://tv.cctv.com/2023/02/08/VIDE4zLc5io4oeqWu0OGwJfo230208.shtml (accessed 10 February 2024).

10.

CCTV Weibo (2023) Turkey earthquake: rescue has not stopped after over 170 hours. Available at: https://weibo.com/2656274875/MsOBL6QhO (accessed 10 February 2024).

11.

CCTV.com (2024) The social responsibility report of the China media group. Available at: https://news.cctv.com/2024/05/31/ARTIYx8iopCYvaCSCHvEvcE9240530.shtml (accessed 10 February 2024).

12.

Chouliaraki

(2006) The Spectatorship of Suffering. London: Sage.

13.

Chouliaraki

(2013) The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity.

14.

CNN (2023a) ‘This earthquake is a crisis piled upon a crisis,’ says rescue committee head. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2023/02/08/amanpour-miliband-zelensky-earthquake-turkey-syria.cnn?cid=ios_app (accessed 10 February 2024).

15.

CNN (2023b) Hope fades as search for survivors continues in Turkey. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2023/02/14/turkey-recovery-sidner-ac360.cnn?cid=ios_app (accessed 10 February 2024).

16.

CNN tweet (2023) US secretary of state Antony Blinken announced $100 million in disaster relief aid. Available at: https://x.com/CNN/status/1627378761812389891 (accessed 10 February 2024).

17.

Cook

(1998) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Cook

(2018) Neither Friend nor Foe: The Future of U.S.-Turkey Relations. Retrieved from: https://www.cfr.org/report/future-u.s.-turkey

19.

Cottle

(2009) Global Crisis Reporting. New York: Open University Press.

20.

Crawfurd

Dissanayake

Käppeli

(2024) Foreign aid in a time of right-wing populism. Available at: https://www.cgdev.org/blog/foreign-aid-time-right-wing-populism?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed 10 February 2025).

21.

Deuze

(2002) National news cultures: a comparison of Dutch, German, British, Australian, and U.S. journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900110

22.

Duggan

Gottwald

Bersick

(2024) Still a work in progress: the ongoing evolution of the role conception underlying China’s belt and road initiative. Area Development and Policy 9(3): 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2024.2311891

23.

Dworznik

(2020) Making sense of harvey: an exploration of how journalists find meaning in disaster. Newspaper Research Journal 41(2): 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532920919822

24.

Fairclough

(1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

25.

Fang

Nolan

Linggui

(eds) (2022) The Routledge Handbook of the Belt and Road. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

26.

Gurevitch

Blumler

(2004) State of the art of comparative political communication research: poised for maturity? In: Esser

Pfetsch

(eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press, 325–343.

27.

Güvenç

Özel

(2022) US-Turkey relations since world war II: from alliance to transactionalism. In: Tezcür

(ed) The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 523–544.

28.

Hanitzsch

Hanusch

Ramaprasad

, et al. (eds) (2019) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.

29.

(2000) Chinese communist party press in a tug of war: a political economy analysis of the Shenzhen special zone daily. In: Lee

(ed) Money, Power and Media: Communication Patterns in Cultural China. Chicago: Northwest University Press, 112–151.

30.

Hinnebusch

(2023) Great power competition in Syria: from proxy war to sanctions war. Syria Studies 15(1): 1–51.

31.

Imbach

(2023) The earthquake in Turkey and Syria is the fifth deadliest of the 21st century. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2023/02/16/the-earthquake-in-turkey-and-syria-is-the-fifth-deadliest-of-the-21st-century_6016044_8.html (accessed 10 February 2025).

32.

Joye

(2009) The hierarchy of global suffering. Journal of International Communication 15(2): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2009.9674750

33.

Joye

(2018) When societies crash. A critical analysis of news media's social role in the aftermath of national disasters. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 7: 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.7.2.311_1

34.

Jungblut

Althaus

Bajjalieh

, et al. (2024) How shared ties and journalistic cultures shape global news coverage of disruptive media events: the case of the 9/11 terror attacks. Journal of Communication 74(3): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae004

35.

Keats

Buchanan

(2013) Covering trauma in Canadian journalism: exploring the challenges: exploring the challenges. Traumatology 19(3): 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765612466152

36.

Kurasawa

(2009) Global justice as ethico-political labor and the enactment of critical cosmopolitanism. Rethinking Marxism 21(1): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690802542457

37.

Lai

(2012) China’s Soft Power and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.

38.

Chitty

(2021) Paradox of professionalism: the professional identity of journalists who work across media cultures. Journalism 22(1): 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917743175

39.

Magcamit

(2017) Explaining the three-way linkage between populism, securitization, and realist foreign policies: president Donald Trump and the pursuit of “America First” doctrine. World Affairs 180(3): 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820017746263

40.

Meng

(2018) The Politics of Chinese Media: Consensus and Contestation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

41.

Mollerup

Mortensen

(2020) Proximity and distance in the mediation of suffering: local photographers in war-torn Aleppo and the international media circuit. Journalism 21(6): 729–745. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918793054

42.

Nelson

(2013) CCTV’s international expansion: china’s grand strategy for media? A report to the center for international media assistance. Available at: https://www.cima.ned.org/ (accessed 10 February 2025).

43.

Office of the Historian (2017) USAID and PL–480, 1961–1969. Available at: https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/pl-80?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed 10 February 2025).

44.

Orgeret

(2018) Cheap clothes: distant disasters. Journalism turning suffering into practical action. Journalism 19(7): 976–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916671902

45.

Özdamar

(2024) Role theory in practice: US–Turkey relations in their worst decade. International Studies Perspectives 25: 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad014

46.

Pantti

(2019) Journalism and witnessing. In: Wahl-Jorgensen

Hanitzsch

(eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 151–164.

47.

Pasti

(2005) Two generations of contemporary Russian journalists. European Journal of Communication 20(1): 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105049634

48.

Perdomo

Rodrigues-Rouleau

(2022) Transparency as metajournalistic performance: the New York times’ caliphate podcast and new ways to claim journalistic authority. Journalism 23(11): 2311–2327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921997312

49.

(2019) Rebranding China: Contested Status Signaling in the Changing Global Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

50.

Shah

SFA

Jan

Ginossar

, et al. (2022) Trauma exposure and post-traumatic stress disorder among regional journalists in Pakistan. Journalism 23(2): 391–408. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920965783

51.

Shoemaker

Reese

(2014) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.

52.

Society of Professional Journalists (n.d.) Code of ethics. Available at: https://www.spj.org/pdf/spj-code-of-ethics-poster.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed 10 February 2025).

53.

Stockmann

(2012) Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Strauss

(2021) Scripts, authority, and legitimacy: the view from China and beyond. In: Rai

Gluhovic

Jestrovic

, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Politics and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

55.

Strömbäck

Dimitrova

(2011) Mediatization and media interventionism: a comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16(1): 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210379504

56.

Van Belle

(2000) New York times and network TV news coverage of foreign disasters: the significance of the insignificant variables. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77(1): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700105

57.

van Dalen

de Vreese

Albæk

(2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism 13(7): 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431538

58.

Vestergaard

(2022) Text-analytical approaches to humanitarian communication. In: Chouliaraki

Vestergaard

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication. New York: Routledge, 104–118.

59.

Vos

Hanusch

(2024) Conceptualizing embeddedness as a key dimension for analyzing journalistic cultures. Communication Theory 34(1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad018

60.

Wolfsfeld

(2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Routledge.

61.

Zhang

(2023) The politics of pity under authoritarianism: how government-controlled media regulates audiences' mediated experiences of distant suffering. International Journal of Communication 17: 5089–5107. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19850

62.

Yang

Zhao

(2015) Performance legitimacy, state autonomy and China's economic miracle. Journal of Contemporary China 24(91): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.918403

63.

(2023) The unequal others: mediation of distant COVID-19 suffering in Chinese television news. Chinese Journal of Communication 16(3): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2023.2196086

64.

Zeng

Sparks

(2019) Production and politics in Chinese television. Media, Culture & Society 41(1): 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718764785

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB

Same disaster,different witnesses: The impact of journalistic cultures on the Chinese and U.S. media’s reporting on the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material