Guided by the theory of new institutionalism and platform dependency, this study examines how Chinese party media engage with social media platforms. Based on in-depth interviews with 18 social media editors from central and local party outlets, the findings reveal three interrelated dynamics. First, party media are simultaneously dependent on audience traffic and autonomous from it in news selection, a balance shaped by platform preferences, journalistic norms, and political identity. Second, party media's visibility on platforms is sustained not only by state policies but also by the outlets’ invisible political and symbolic capital, which helps maintain institutional continuity amid evolving digital landscapes. Third, dual-track performance assessment standards emerge, wherein audience traffic is strategically emphasized or de-emphasized to enable party media to balance the goal of maximizing audience reach with the imperative of maintaining ideological authority. These findings highlight the instrumental nature of platform dependency in party media and the guided role of the state in shaping media-platform relations.
AgarwalS (2025) Rooting platform dependencies in the digital news economy: Google news initiative in India. International Journal of Communication19: 135–158.
AnterL (2024) How news organizations coordinate, select, and edit content for social media platforms: a systematic literature review. Journalism Studies25(9): 1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2023.2235428
BannermanSHaggartB (2015) Historical institutionalism in communication studies. Communication Theory25(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12051
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
ChenXKayeDBVZengJ (2021) #PositiveEnergy Douyin: constructing “playful patriotism” in a Chinese short-video application. Chinese Journal of Communication14(1): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1761848
8.
ChenCCWangZHGnJ (2023) Serve the traffic: the logic of traffic and its politics on wechat platform. Social Media + Society9(3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231193025
9.
ChristinA (2020) Metrics at Work: Journalism and the Contested Meaning of Algorithms. Princeton University Press.
CunninghamSCraigD (2021) Creator Culture: An Introduction to Global Social Media Entertainment. New York University Press.
12.
DavisMXiaoJ (2021) De-westernizing platform studies: history and logics of Chinese and U.S. platforms. International Journal of Communication15: 103–122.
13.
de KloetJPoellTGuohuaZ, et al. (2019) The plaformization of Chinese society: infrastructure, governance, and practice. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1644008
14.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
15.
Dvir-GvirsmanS (2025) The meaning of like: how social-media editors and users make sense of social media engagement. Journalism Practice19(5): 1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2228782
16.
EhrlénVVilliM (2025) Opting out of analytics: the tacit compliance of journalists in datafied newsrooms. Journalism1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251352833
17.
FangK (2022) The tabloidization of party media: how the People’s daily and CCTV adapt to social media. In: ZhangS (ed) Digital Journalism in China. Routledge, pp. 48–60.
18.
Ferrer-ConillRTandocECJr (2018) The audience-oriented editor: making sense of the audience in the newsroom. Digital Journalism6(4): 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972
19.
ForsströmE (2024) Exploring In/Dependency in the Digital Platform Era: Nordic Public Service Media Navigating the Success of Social Media News. Master’s dissertation. Stockholm University.
HartleyJMPetreCBengtssonM, et al. (2023) Autonomies and dependencies: shifting configurations of power in the platformization of news. Digital Journalism11(8): 1375–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2257759
22.
HaseVBoczekKScharkowM (2023) Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism11(8): 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2128389
23.
KuaiJLinBKarlssonM, et al. (2023) From wild east to forbidden city: mapping algorithmic news distribution in China through a case study of Jinri Toutiao. Digital Journalism11(8): 1521–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2121932
24.
LamotKPaulussenS (2024) News content promotion pressure: a content analysis of the cross-media visibility of and engagement with news stories. Journalism26(12): 2563–2580. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241279012
25.
LewisSCMolyneuxL (2018) A decade of research on social media and journalism: assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication6(4): 11–23.
26.
LinJde KloetJ (2019) Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media + Society5(4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883430
MeeseJHurcombeE (2020) Facebook, news media and platform dependency: the institutional impacts of news distribution on social platforms. New Media & Society23(8): 2367–2384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820926472
29.
MolyneuxLMcGregorSC (2022) Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter. Information, Communication & Society25(11): 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1874037
30.
NelsonJLTandocJ, EC (2019) Doing “well” or doing “good”: what audience analytics reveal about journalism’s competing goals. Journalism Studies20(13): 1960–1976. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1547122
31.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
32.
NielsenRGanterSA (2018) Dealing with digital intermediaries: a case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society20(4): 1600–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318
33.
OlsenRKTenenboimOHessK, et al. (2024) Platform paradoxes and public service media legitimacy: a cross-national study. Information, Communication & Society28: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2353783
34.
PapanagnouV (2023) Who is a good journalist? Evaluations of journalistic worth in the era of social media. Journalism24(5): 1052–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211036848
35.
PoellTNieborgDBDuffyBE (2023) Spaces of negotiation: analyzing platform power in the news industry. Digital Journalism11(8): 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2103011
36.
PyoJY (2024) Different stakes, different struggles, and different practices to survive: news organizations and the spectrum of platform dependency. New Media & Society26(8): 4572–4588. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221123279
37.
RatnerYDvir GvirsmanSBen-DavidA (2023) “Saving journalism from Facebook’s death grip”? The implications of content-recommendation platforms on publishers and their audiences. Digital Journalism11(8): 1410–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2180403
SehlACorniaANielsenRK (2024) How do funding models and organizational legacy shape news organizations’ social media strategies? A comparison of public service and private sector news media in six countries. Digital Journalism12(9): 1377–1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1968920
40.
TandocECVosTP (2016) The journalist is marketing the news: social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice10(8): 950–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811
41.
TsurielKDvir GvirsmanSZivL, et al. (2021) Servant of two masters: how social media editors balance between mass media logic and social media logic. Journalism22(8): 1983–2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919849417
van DijckJPoellTdeW, M (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in an Online World. Oxford University Press.
44.
WangWYLobatoR (2019) Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1584119
45.
WangHSparksC (2019) Chinese newspaper groups in the digital era: the resurgence of the party press. Journal of Communication69(1): 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy061
46.
WangHYinL (2024) Legitimizing the think-tank turn: the transformation of Chinese media in the digital era. Journalism26: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241264255
XiongHLiuXHeY (2021) Claiming legitimacy: journalists’ discursive strategies for rationalizing “brand propaganda” within Chinese local press. Journalism Studies22(4): 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1880335
49.
YangG (2021) Social media and state-sponsored platformization in China. In: YangGWangW (eds) Engaging Social Media in China: Platforms, Publics, and Production. Michigan State University Press, pp. xi–xxxi.
ZhangY (2020) New media editors and journalists’ “face perspective”: the dimension of interpersonal relationships in news production on WeChat public accounts of news media (in Chinese). Shanghai Journalism Review38(11): 13–25.
52.
ZhangWChenZXiY (2020) Traffic media: how algorithmic imaginations and practices change content production. Chinese Journal of Communication14(1): 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1830422
53.
ZhaoY (2012) Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. In: HallinDCManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–176.
ZouS (2023) Restyling propaganda: popularized party press and the making of soft propaganda in China. Information, Communication & Society26(1): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1942954
