This study combines corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis to compare the discursive representation of influencers in Chinese and US mainstream English newspapers (2020–2024). The findings suggest that Chinese newspapers tend to represent influencers as positive agents who are instrumental in promoting culture and tourism, advancing the digital economy through livestream sales and overseas e-commerce, contributing to poverty alleviation, and disseminating scientific and policy knowledge. In contrast, US newspapers prefer to portray influencers as more intricate and multifaceted figures who shape elections and lifestyle trends, navigate controversial social issues, narrate personal lives, and strategically collaborate to advance their goals, while also facing criticism for contributing to overconsumption. This study further explores how discursive strategies and linguistic means are deployed to construct these divergent representations. Conceptualizing influencer discourse as a dynamic, contextually situated continuum, this study elucidates how different portrayals are interactively shaped by cultural values, media systems, national ideology, and broader socio-political structures.
AbidinCLeeJBarbettaT, et al. (2021) Influencers and COVID-19: reviewing key issues in press coverage across Australia, China, Japan, and South Korea. Media International Australia178(1): 114–135.
BakerP (2023) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. 2nd edition. Bloomsbury.
5.
BakerPBrookesGAtanasovaD, et al. (2020) Changing frames of obesity in the UK press 2008–2017. Social Science & Medicine264: 113403.
6.
BrownDHayesN (2008) Influencer Marketing: Who Really Influences Your Customers?Taylor & Francis.
7.
ChenJChengH (2024) Achieving postfeminist ideals: a study of Chinese female wanghongs and their self-framing on social media. Feminist Media Studies24(7): 1531–1547.
8.
ChengLChewM (2024) Functional interlopers: lifestyle journalists’ discursive construction of boundaries against digital lifestyle influencers. Journalism25(2): 372–390.
9.
ChoSWangZ (2021) Towards media systems framework in Asia Chinese and Korean media on framing the initial COVID-19 pandemic. International Communication Gazette83(5): 474–496.
10.
DevosSEggermontSVandenboschL (2022) Instagram influencers as superwomen: influencers’ lifestyle presentations observed through framing analysis. Media and Communication10(1): 173–184.
11.
Droz-dit-BussetO (2020) “So-called influencers”: stancetaking and (de)legitimation in mediatized discourse about social media influencers. Discourse, Context & Media49: 100629.
12.
FaircloughN (1995) Media Discourse. Edward Arnold.
13.
FaircloughN (2001) Language and Power. 2nd edition. Longman.
14.
FangK (2021) What is zimeiti? The commercial logic of content provision on China’s social media platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication15(1): 75–94.
15.
GräveJ (2017) Exploring the perception of influencers vs. traditional celebrities: are social media stars a new type of endorser?Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society. Toronto, Canada, 28–30 July 2017.
16.
GuanZZhouOT (2024) Wanghong e-commerce in/as China’s economic transformation: a case study of beauty wanghong. Global Media and China. Available at. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364241278103
17.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HanuschFHanitzschTLauererC (2015) How much love are you going to give this brand?’ Lifestyle journalists on commercial influences in their work. Journalism18(2): 141–158.
HarrisonL (2024) Unpacking Micro-Influence Within the Australian Creative Sectors. Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
JinYXiHWangX, et al. (2022) Evaluation of the integration policy in China: does the integration of culture and tourism promote tourism development?Annals of Tourism Research97: 103491.
22.
KozinetsRGretzelUGambettiR (2023) Influencers and Creators: Business, Culture and Practice. Sage.
23.
LinA (2014) Critical discourse analysis in applied linguistics: a methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics34: 213–232.
24.
LiuMHuangJ (2023) Framing responsibilities for climate change in Chinese and American newspapers: a corpus-assisted discourse study. Journalism25(8): 1792–1811.
25.
LiuYZhouD (2024) The cultural influence of social media in the digital economy: internet celebrities and brand marketing. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology21(4): 1–15.
26.
LuCZhangKZhangJ (2023) Media representations of Nüding in China (2005-2015). International Journal of Communication17: 1984–2002.
27.
MaSChaiYZhangH (2018) Rise of cross-border e-commerce exports in China. China & World Economy26(3): 63–87.
28.
McIntyreK (2016) What makes “good” news newsworthy?Communication Research Reports33(3): 223–230.
29.
MeyerM (2001) Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage, 14–31.
30.
MortensonST (2002) Sex, communication values, and cultural values: individualism‐collectivism as a mediator of sex differences in communication values in two cultures. Communication Reports15(1): 57–70.
31.
PangNSunMZhuH (2024) Representation of migrant workers in Chinese newspapers: combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities39: 1092–1111.
32.
PartingtonADuguidATaylorC (2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). John Benjamins.
33.
PeiJChengL (2024) Representations of 5G in the Chinese and British press: a corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1): 400.
34.
PeiJLiDChengL (2022) Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Communication16(5): 598–618.
PojanapunyaPWatson ToddR (2018) Log-likelihood and odds ratio: keyness statistics for different purposes of keyword analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory14(1): 133–167.
37.
PottsABednarekMCapleH (2015) How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on Hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication9(2): 149–172.
38.
QiuLWangX (2024) Content analysis of the self-presentation of silver influencers on Douyin platformProceedings of 2024 International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science & Technology (CoST). Beijing, China, 25–28 August 2024.
39.
RaysonP (2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4): 519–549.
40.
RichardsonJE (2007) Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
SchröterM (2018) Absence in critical discourse analysis. In: WojahnDSeiler BryllaCWestbergG (eds) Kritiska text- och diskursstudier [Critical Text- and Discourse Studies]. Södertörns högskola, 37–56.
ShenS (2023) Mukbang streamers in China: wanghong as industry, laborer, and exemplar of social transformation. International Journal of Communication17: 4097–4116.
44.
SongYHuangZSchuldtJ, et al. (2021) National prisms of a global phenomenon: a comparative study of press coverage of climate change in the US, UK and China. Journalism23(10): 2208–2229.
45.
SunT (2024) The Russia-Ukraine conflict as a discursive continuum: a comparative study of Business Today and New York Times using an extended corpus-based discourse-historical approach. Journalism25(12): 2702–2722.
46.
SunSZhaiYShenB, et al. (2020) Newspaper coverage of artificial intelligence: a perspective of emerging technologies. Telematics and Informatics53: 101433.
47.
TangL (2018) Transitive representations of China’s image in the US mainstream newspapers: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Journalism22(3): 804–820.
48.
TumberHWaisbordS (2017) The media and human rights: mapping the field. In: TumberHWaisbordS (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights. Routledge, 1–23.
49.
Van DijkTA (1988) News as Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50.
WangYFengWDWangH (2024) Gender order, microcelebrities, and the COVID-19 pandemic: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the representation of wanghong women in China’s English-language newspapers. Sage Open14(3): 1–14.
51.
WodakR (2001a) What CDA is about: a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage, 1–13.
52.
WodakR (2001b) The discourse-historical approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage, 63–94.
53.
WodakRBuschB (2004) Approaches to media texts. In: DowningJH (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies. Sage, 105–122.
54.
XieR (2019) Why China had to ban cryptocurrency but the US did not: a comparative analysis of regulations on crypto-markets between the US and China. Washington University Global Studies Law Review18(2): 457–492.
55.
YangY (2022) TikTok/Douyin use and its influencer video use: a cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and US users. Online Media and Global Communication1(2): 339–368.
56.
YuanMSwedlowB (2022) Chinese cultural biases, value congruence, and support for and compliance with protective policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Policy Research41(3): 415–447.
