News organizations face mounting challenges in the social media era. This study, informed by the Normalization Process Theory, examines how social media metrics are embedded into the news production routines across Greater China, mapping journalists’ coherence (making sense of), cognitive participation (engaging with), collective action (adapting workflows for), and reflexive monitoring (evaluating) of traffic-driven practices. Semi-structured interviews with 19 news professionals reveal that while reporters uphold traditional standards like fairness and balance, they actively normalize social media affordances by innovating formats and content structures to align platform demands with institutional constraints. Key strategies include focusing on apolitical stories in order to align with official propaganda or avoid potential backlash, repackaging news with clickbait elements, and adopting shorter, interactive layouts specifically tailored for digital platforms. These practices enable pragmatic survival but also risk account shutdowns, revealing ongoing normalization struggles as technology and journalism negotiate their divergent logics.
ArguedasAARBadrinathanSMont’AlverneC, et al. (2022) It’s a battle you are never going to win: perspectives from journalists in four countries on how digital media platforms undermine trust in news. Journalism Studies23(14): 1821–1840.
2.
BellEJOwenTBrownPD, et al. (2017) The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism. Tow Center for Digital Journalism.
3.
BossioDHoltonAE (2021) Burning out and turning off: journalists’ disconnection strategies on social media. Journalism22(10): 2475–2492.
4.
BrandtzaegPBLüdersMSpangenbergJ, et al. (2016) Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice10(3): 323–342.
ChuaEHC (2023) An ethic of efficacy. In: ChuaEHC (ed) The Currency of Truth: Newsmaking and the Late-Socialist Imaginaries of China’s Digital Era. University of Michigan Press, 70–95.
7.
DenisovaA (2022) Viral journalism. Strategy, tactics and limitations of the fast spread of content on social media: case study of the United Kingdom quality publications. Journalism24(9): 1919–1937.
8.
Djerf-PierreMGhersettiMHedmanU (2016) Appropriating social media. Digital Journalism4(7): 849–860.
9.
DonsbachW (2015) The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
EnliGSimonsenC-A (2017) ‘Social media logic’ meets professional norms: twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information, Communication & Society21(8): 1081–1096.
11.
FangKRepnikovaM (2021) The state-preneurship model of digital journalism innovation: cases from China. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(2): 497–517.
12.
GibbsMMeeseJArnoldM, et al. (2015) #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society18(3): 255–268.
HanuschFBrunsA (2017) Journalistic branding on Twitter: a representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital Journalism5(1): 26–43.
15.
HermidaA (2012) Social journalism: exploring how social media is shaping journalism. In: SiaperaEVeglisA (eds) The Handbook of Global Online Journalism. Wiley-Blackwell, 309–328.
16.
HighfieldTLeaverT (2016) Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice2(1): 47–62.
17.
HumayunMFFerrucciP (2022) Understanding social media in journalism practice: a typology. Digital Journalism10(9): 1502–1525.
18.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 366–410.
19.
KhalfanWLugo-OcandoJAlemánJLR (2024) Coding and capability-building in nonprofit digital-native news organizations in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Latin America (LATAM). Digital Journalism12(7): 1007–1029.
20.
KlingerU (2013) Mastering the art of social media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Information, Communication & Society16(5): 717–736.
21.
LasorsaDLLewisSCHoltonAE (2012) Normalizing Twitter: journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies13(1): 19–36.
22.
LehtisaariKVilliMGrönlundM, et al. (2018) Comparing innovation and social media strategies in Scandinavian and US newspapers. Digital Journalism6(8): 1029–1040.
23.
LewisSCWestlundO (2014) Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work. Digital Journalism3(1): 19–37.
24.
LischkaJA (2021) Logics in social media news making: how social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism22(2): 430–447.
MayCFinchT (2009) Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology43(3): 535–554.
27.
MayCRMairFFinchT, et al. (2009) Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science4: 29.
28.
MelladoCHermidaA (2022) A conceptual framework for journalistic identity on social media: how the personal and professional contribute to power and profit. Digital Journalism10(2): 284–299.
29.
MolyneuxLMourãoRR (2019) Political journalists’ normalization of Twitter: interaction and new affordances. Journalism Studies20(2): 248–266.
30.
NipJYMChengYC (2022) Assessing the impact of digital alternative news media in a hybrid news environment: cases from Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journalism and Media3(3): 568–593.
31.
PalinkasLAHorwitzSMGreenCA, et al. (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health42(5): 533–544.
32.
PapaVKourosT (2023) Do Facebook and Google care about journalism? Mapping the relationship between affordances of GNI and FJP tools and journalistic norms. Digital Journalism11(8): 1475–1498.
33.
PerreaultGPFerrucciP (2020) What is digital journalism? Defining the practice and role of the digital journalist. Digital Journalism8(10): 1298–1316.
34.
PerreaultGPHanuschF (2024) Normalizing Instagram. Digital Journalism12(4): 413–430.
35.
PerreaultGPBélair-GagnonVHenrichsenJR (2025) Disruptions in normalization: reflexive monitoring in journalism adaptation and audience collaboration. Journalism Studies26: 698–714.
RobinsonS (2011) Convergence crises: news work and news space in the digitally transforming newsroom. Journal of Communication61(6): 1122–1141.
38.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246.
39.
TandocECVosTP (2016) The journalist is marketing the news: social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice10(8): 950–966.
ThornbergRCharmazK (2014) Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In: FlickU (ed) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, 153–169.
42.
TseCH (2024) Alternative news values in community citizen journalism: the case of PEOPO in Taiwan. Journalism Practice: 1–18.
43.
Van DijckJPoellTDe WaalM (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
44.
Van DrunenM (2021) Editorial independence in an automated media system. Internet Policy Review10(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1569
45.
Vázquez-HerreroJNegreira-ReyMCLópez-GarcíaX (2022) Let’s dance the news! how the news media are adapting to the logic of TikTok. Journalism23(8): 1717–1735.
46.
VerstappenMOpgenhaffenM (2023) Making it fit: how science news gets remediated for Facebook and Instagram. Journalism Studies25: 1010–1028.
47.
WaltersP (2021) Reclaiming control: how journalists embrace social media logics while defending journalistic values. Digital Journalism10(9): 1482–1501.
48.
WangHMengJ (2022) The de-professionalization of Chinese journalism. Chinese Journal of Communication16(1): 1–18.
49.
WangHSparksC (2018) Chinese newspaper groups in the digital era: the resurgence of the party press. Journal of Communication69(1): 94–119.
50.
WeissAS (2015) The digital and social media journalist: a comparative analysis of journalists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. International Communication Gazette77(1): 74–101.
51.
WildingDFrayPMolitoriszS, et al. (2018) The impact of digital platforms on news and journalistic content. Digital Platforms Inquiry.
52.
WuS (2020) When new media operates within a state-mediated press system: assessing new media’s impact on journalism crisis perceptions in Singapore and Hong Kong. Information, Communication & Society23(4): 572–587.
53.
WuYShenF (2020) Negativity makes us polarized: a longitudinal study of media tone and opinion polarization in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication30(3–4): 199–220.
XuJHeZZengX, et al. (2025) The “Journalistic I” in multiplatform:A comparative study of Chinese journalists’ branding practices. Journalism Practice: 1–19.
56.
YuanZ (2015) Online news. In: TracyK (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Wiley-Blackwell.
57.
ZhaoLZhouB (2025) How does the platformization of journalism scholarship contribute (or fail) to practice? Chinese Journalists’ views. Journalism26(8): 1624–1644.
58.
ZhongZWangTHuangM (2017) Does the Great Fire Wall cause self-censorship? The effects of perceived internet regulation and the justification of regulation. Internet Research27(4): 974–990.
59.
ZhouY (2008) Voluntary adopters versus forced adopters: integrating the diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model to study intra-organizational adoption. New Media & Society10(3): 475–496.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
