Disruption in local news has spurred development of varying journalism forms, including news collaborations and digital start-ups, and has increased the salience of social actors who are not news producers. With these changes have come new and different sets of standards on ethics, diversity, community engagement and news operations. Framed by an institutional “supply side” perspective, this study examines the adoption and adaptation of standards by local news collaborations and digital startups. A content analysis of the websites and standards of 119 local news collaborations and digital news start-ups indicate both non-profit news producers and news producers that emphasize “watchdog” accountability had more standards and more extensive standards. Additionally, news producers frequently distance standards from daily production and only infrequently require compliance. Results suggest local news management should be intentional in adopting standards and integrate them meaningfully into daily operations while keeping an eye on relevance to the local area.
AldrichHERuefMLippmannS (2020) Organizations Evolving. 3rd edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
2.
AucoinJA (2022) IRE and the institutionalization of investigative journalism. American Journalism39: 419–429.
3.
BeamRAMeeksL (2011) So many stories, so little time. In: LowreyWGadeP (eds) Changing the News: The Forces Shaping Journalism in Uncertain Times. New York, NY: Routledge, 230–248.
4.
BrunssonN (1989) The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. New York: Wiley.
5.
BrunssonN (2000) Organizations, markets and standardization. In: BrunssonNJacobssonB (eds) A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–39.
6.
BrunssonN (2007) The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BrunssonNJacobssonB (2000) The contemporary expansion of standardization. In: BrunssonNJacobssonB (eds) A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–17.
8.
DeephouseDLBundyJTostLP, et al. (2017) Organizational legitimacy: six key questions. In: GreenwoodROliverCLawrenceTB, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. 2nd edition. New York: Sage, 27–54.
9.
DjelicMLden HondF (2014) Introduction: multiplicity and plurality in the world of standards. Business and Politics16: 67–77.
10.
EllisG (2012) Journalism’s road codes: The enduring nature of common ethical standards. Pacific Journalism Review18: 118–130.
11.
FinkA (1995) Media Ethics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
GiotisC (2023) Missing what counts: can Google and Facebook be forced to support quality news?Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics20(1): 43–59.
13.
GravesLLauerL (2020) From movement to institution: the “Global Fact” summit as a field configuring event. Sociologica14: 157–174.
14.
HaedickeMA (2012) “Keeping our mission, changing our system”: translation and organizational change in natural food co-ops. The Sociological Quarterly53(1): 44–67.
15.
HallettTVentrescaM (2006) Inhabited institutions: social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s “patterns of industrial bureaucracy.”. Theory and Society35: 213–236.
16.
HimelboimILimorY (2011) The societal role of journalism—an international comparative study of 242 codes of ethics. Mass Communication & Society14(1): 71–92.
17.
IhleboekKAFigenschouTU (2022) Knock! Knock! Right-wing alternative media is at the door: institutional boundary work in a hybrid media environment. In: FerrucciPEldridgeIIISA (eds) The Institutions Changing Journalism: Barbarians inside the Gate. London: Routledge, 17–30.
18.
JohnsonR (1993). Editor’s introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on art, literature and culture. In: BourdieuP (Eds.) The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
19.
KoniecznaM (2020) Reimagining newsroom collaboration: how two European news nonprofits are inviting citizens in. Journalism Practice14(5): 592–607.
20.
LoosenWAhvaLReimerJ, et al. (2022) X journalism’. Exploring journalism’s diverse meanings through the names we give it. Journalism23(1): 39–58.
21.
LowreyW (2012) Journalism innovation and the ecology of news production: institutional tendencies. Journalism & Communication Monographs14: 214–287.
22.
LowreyWDanielsGL (2017) Assessing a 10-year experiment in community journalism education. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94: 335–354.
23.
LowreyWDeavoursDFSingletonW (2022) Agents of meta: institutional actors in the journalism space and the innovation of local news. Journalism24: 1155–1173.
24.
LowreyWMacklinCUseryAG (2023) News Collaborations and social actors: the translation of fieldwide ideas to local levels. Journalism Studies24: 783–802.
25.
McIntyreKELoughK (2021) Toward a clearer conceptualization and operationalization of solutions journalism. Journalism22(6): 1558–1573.
26.
McQuailDDeuzeM (2020) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 7th edition. New York: Sage.
27.
MelladoCVan DalenA (2014) Between rhetoric and practice. Journalism Studies15: 859–878.
28.
MerrillJOdellJC (1983) Philosophy and Journalism. New York, NY: Longman.
29.
PowerM (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
SherrillLZhangJDeavoursD, et al. (2021) Journalism’s backstage players: the development of journalism professional associations and their roles in a troubled field. Journal of Media Business Studies19: 53–71.
31.
SoloskiJ (1997) News reporting and professionalism: some constraints on the reporting of the news. In: BerkowitzD (ed) Social Meanings of News: A Text-Reader. New York: Sage, 138–154.
TimmermansSEpsteinS (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology36: 69–89.
34.
TolbertPSHallRH (2009) Organizations: Structures, Processes and Outcomes. 10th edition. London: Pearson Education, Inc.
35.
VosTPThomasRJ (2018) The discursive construction of journalistic authority in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies19(13): 2001–2010.
36.
WedlinLSahlinK (2017) The imitation and translation of management ideas. In: GreenwoodROliverCLawrenceTB, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. New York: Sage, 102–127.
37.
WildingDMolitoriszS (2022) Improving news media oversight: why Australia needs a cross-platform standards scheme. Australian Journalism Review44(1): 19–38.
38.
WilkinsLBrennenB (2004) Conflicted interests, contested terrain: journalism ethics codes then and now. Journalism Studies5: 297–309.
