This study explores how Public Service Media (PSM) innovation laboratories navigate a complex institutional environment that simultaneously constrains and demands innovation. Drawing on the concepts of isomorphic pressures and institutional logics, the study investigates strategies used by PSM innovation labs to innovate within institutional constraints. Based on interviews with editorial technologists from three PSM innovation labs in Germany, we identify five institutional logics that enable innovation despite strong normative and coercive pressures: the logics of agility, efficiency, public service, audience, and interdisciplinary collaboration. These logics function as adaptive mechanisms that enable PSM innovation labs to balance the demands of innovation with adherence to norms, regulations, and limited resources. Our findings illustrate how PSMs can manage institutional complexity and sustain innovation within constrained operational environments. Hence, this study offers a dynamic view of isomorphism, where conformity and agency coexist, and where innovation can emerge from within institutional boundaries rather than in opposition to them.
BlassnigSEsserF (2022) The “audience logic” in digital journalism: an exploration of shifting news logics across media types and time. Journalism Studies23(1): 48–69.
4.
CaplanRboydD (2018) Isomorphism through algorithms: institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook. Big Data & Society5(1): 1–12.
5.
CoolsHvan GorpBOpgenhaffenM (2024) New organizations, different journalistic roles, and innovative projects: how second-generation newsroom innovation labs are changing the news ecosystem. Journalism Practice18(6): 1605–1620.
6.
Costera MeijerI (2020) Understanding the audience turn in journalism: from quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies21(16): 2326–2342.
7.
DeuzeM (2005) What is Journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism (London)6(4): 442–464.
8.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
9.
EsserF (2013) Mediatization as a challenge: media logic versus political logic. In: KriesiHLavenexSEsserF, et al. (eds) Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 155–176.
10.
EvansSK (2018) Making sense of innovation: process, product, and storytelling innovation in public service broadcasting organizations. Journalism Studies19(1): 4–24.
11.
FriedlandRAlfordRR (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: PowellWWDiMaggioP (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 232–263.
12.
GlaserBG (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions (First Printing). Mill Valley, Calif: Sociology Press.
13.
HamiltonJT (2004) All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Hogh-JanovskyIMeierK (2021) Journalism innovation labs 2.0 in media organisations: a motor for transformation and constant learning. Journalism and Media2(3): 361–378.
15.
HöligS (2023) Germany. In: NewmanNFletcherREddyK, et al. (eds) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. 76–77. doi: 10.60625/risj-p6es-hb13.
16.
HumprechtECastro HerreroLBlassnigS, et al. (2022) Media systems in the digital age: an empirical comparison of 30 countries. The Journal of Communication. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqab054.
17.
JantunenATarkiainenAChariS, et al. (2018) Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry. Journal of Business Research89: 251–257.
18.
KosterichA (2022) News Nerds: Institutional Change in Journalism. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics Series. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
LamotKPaulussenSvan AelstP (2021) Do metrics drive news decisions? Political news journalists’ exposure and attitudes toward web analytics. Electronic News15(1–2): 3–20.
20.
LischkaJA (2020) Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism. Journal of Media Business Studies17(2): 113–131.
21.
LischkaJASchaetzNOltersdorfA-L (2023) Editorial technologists as engineers of journalism’s future: exploring the professional community of computational journalism. Digital Journalism11(6): 1026–1044.
22.
LoweGFMaijanenP (2019) Making sense of the public service mission in media: youth audiences, competition, and strategic management. Journal of Media Business Studies16(1): 1–18.
MartinFLoweGF [Gregory F] (2014) The value and values of public service media. The Value of Public Service Media. Nordicom: Gothenburg, 19–40.
25.
MedinaMPérez-LatreFJGonzalez-TosatC (2025) Audience listening as a path for public service media: the case of “La Gran Consulta” in Spain. International Journal of Listening: 1–12.
26.
MillsJWagemansA (2021) Media labs: constructing journalism laboratories, innovating the future: how journalism is catalysing its future processes, products and people. Convergence (London)27(5): 1462–1487.
27.
NelFRymajdoK (2024) Securing the future of UK public-interest news: navigating change with foresight and innovation. Media and Communication12: Article7497.
28.
NielsenRK (2017) The one thing journalism just might do for democracy. Journalism Studies18(10): 1251–1262.
29.
PallasJFredrikssonMWedlinL (2016) Translating institutional logics: when the media logic meets professions. Organization Studies37(11): 1661–1684.
30.
PicardRG (2004) The economics of the daily newspaper industry. In: AlexanderAOwersJCarvethR, et al. (eds) Media Economics: Theory and Practice. 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 109–125.
RaviolaEHartmannB (2015) Business perspectives on work in news organizations. Journal of Media Business Studies6(1): 7–36.
33.
RohnU (2018) Media management research in the twenty-first century. In: AlbarranABMierzejewskaBIJungJ (eds) Handbook of Media Management and Economics. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge, 425–441. Series: Media management and economics: Routledge.
34.
SaurweinFEberweinTKarmasinM (2019) Public service media in Europe: exploring the relationship between funding and audience performance. Javnost - the Public26(3): 291–308.
35.
SchaetzN (2024) Journalism & audience datafication: how audience data practices shape inequity. Digital Journalism12(8): 1184–1204.
36.
SehlACorniaA (2021) How do public service media innovate? An analysis of product development by European PSM. Journalism Studies22(11): 1469–1486.
37.
SehlAEderM (2023) News personalization and public service media: the audience perspective in three European countries. Journalism and Media4(1): 322–338.
38.
SimonFM (2025) Rationalisation of the news: how AI reshapes and retools the gatekeeping processes of news organisations in the United Kingdom, United States and Germany. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/14614448251336423.
39.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958– 1990. American Journal of Sociology105(3): 801–843.
40.
ThorntonPHOcasioWLounsburyM (2015) The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. In: ScottRAKosslynSM (eds). Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
41.
VirtaSLoweGF [Gregory Ferrell] (2016) Crossing boundaries for innovation : content development for PSM at Yle. In: Nordicom Bokserie RIPE. Crossing Borders and Boundaries in Public Service Media, 229–246. Retrieved from: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/44888
42.
WuSTandocECSalmonCT (2019) When journalism and automation intersect: assessing the influence of the technological field on contemporary newsrooms. Journalism Practice13(10): 1238–1254.
43.
ZamithRBraunJA (2019) Technology and journalismThe International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, Vol. 1–7.
44.
Zaragoza FusterMTGarcía AvilésJA (2022) Public service media laboratories as communities of practice: implementing innovation at BBC news labs and RTVE lab. Journalism Practice: 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2022.2088602.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
