Classical institutionalized journalistic ethics struggle to deal with the implications of using AI tools, as these tools both create new ethical issues, and new forms of existing ethical issues. This paper reviews how the fields of journalistic research, computer science, and philosophy address emerging ethical challenges in the wake of the wide-scale introduction of AI tools to journalistic practice. It reviews the types of issues researchers attempt to solve and how they approach them from the viewpoint of three dominant ethical models. The paper finds that utilitarian - predominantly negative utilitarian - models are prevalent, and deontological and virtue ethical models are not represented well. I describe why this lack of virtue ethics, deontology and/or mixed models impedes innovation with regards to handling certain types of ethical problems in AI journalism. I argue that if these models were to become more prevalent, this could contribute in a number of ways to AI journalism research in the included fields of computer science, philosophy, and journalism.
AlexanderLMooreM (2021) Deontological ethics. In: ZaltaEN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
2.
BabichB (2017) Heidegger on technology and gelassenheit: Wabi-sabi and the art of verfallenheit. AI & Society32(2): 157–166.
3.
BenderEMGebruTMcMillan-MajorA, et al. (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. Presented at the FAccT’21: 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, ACM, Virtual Event Canada, 3–10 March 2021, 610–623. DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445922.
4.
CoeckelberghM (2020) AI Ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001.
5.
CybenkoAKCybenkoG (2018) AI and fake news. IEEE Intelligent Systems33: 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2018.2877280.
6.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6: 442–464. DOI: 10.1177/1464884905056815.
7.
Díaz-CampoJChaparroMÁ (2020) Computational journalism and ethics: an analysis of deontological codes of Latin American. Revista ICONO14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes2020(18): 10–32. DOI: 10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1488.
8.
Dixon-WoodsMCaversDAgarwalS, et al. (2006) Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology6: 35. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
9.
DörrKHollnbuchnerNHollnbuchnerK (2017) Ethical challenges of algorithmic journalism. Digital Journalism5(4): 404–419.
10.
EdwardsJKaimalG (2016) Using meta-synthesis to support application of qualitative methods findings in practice: a discussion of meta-ethnography, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretive synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy51: 30–35.
11.
EybenBV (2016) Juridisk Ordbog. 14th edition. Toronto, ON: Thomson Reuters.
12.
FairbanksJPFitchNBradfieldF, et al. (2020) Credibility development with knowledge graphs. In: GrimmeCPreussMTakesF, et al. (eds) Disinformation in Open Online Media. MISDOOM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Vol. 12021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_4.
13.
FerrarioALoiMViganoE (2020) In AI we trust incrementally: a multi-layer model of trust to analyze human-artificial intelligence interactions. Philosophy & Technology33(3): 523–539.
14.
GauthierDavid P. (1986) Morals by agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.
HansenMRoca-SalesMKeeganJM, et al. (2017) Artificial Intelligence: Practice and Implications for Journalism. New York, NY: Columbia University. DOI: 10.7916/D8X92PRD.
17.
HeitzLLischkaJABirrerA, et al. (2022) Benefits of diverse news recommendations for democracy: a user study. Digital Journalism10: 1710–1730. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2021.2021804.
JamilS (2021) Artificial intelligence and journalistic practice: the crossroads of obstacles and opportunities for the Pakistani journalists. Journalism Practice15(10): 1400–1422.
20.
KantI (1797) Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals : And, What Is Enlightenment? Translated by Lewis White Beck. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
LeeSNahSChungDSKimJ (2020) Predicting AI news credibility: communicative or social capital or both?Communication Studies71(3): 428–447.
22.
LinYTHungTWHuangLTL (2021) Engineering equity: how AI can help reduce the harm of implicit bias. Philosophy & Technology34: 65–90. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-020-00406-7.
23.
MacnairB (1998) The Sociology of Journalism. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, Bloomsbury Publishing.
24.
McManusJH (1997) Who’s responsible for journalism?Journal of Mass Media Ethics121: 5–17.
25.
MøllerLA (2022) Between personal and public interest: how Algorithmic news recommendation reconciles with journalism as an ideology. Digital Journalism1–19.
26.
Møller HartleyJAskaniusT (2021) Activist-journalism and the norm of objectivity: role performance in the reporting of the #MeToo movement in Denmark and Sweden. Journalism Practice15: 860–877. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1805792.
27.
MooreGE (1912) Principia Ethica. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ethics Oxford University Press.
28.
MoyoL (2019) Data journalism and the panama papers: new horizons for investigative journalism in Africa. In: Data Journalism in the Global South. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 23–38. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25177-2_2.
29.
MüllerVC (2021) Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In: ZaltaEN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
30.
NtoutsiEFafaliosPGadirajuU, et al. (2020) Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems—an introductory survey. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10: e1356. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1356.
31.
Online Resources (2015) Ethics - radio television digital news association. URL: https://www.rtdna.org/ethics (accessed 2.17.23).
32.
PattersonTE (1998) The political roles of the journalist. In: GraberDMcQuailDNorrisP (eds) The Politics of News; the News of Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 23–39.
33.
PoelI (2020) Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society, and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence. Human Affairs30: 499–511.
34.
RawlsJ. (1971) A Theory of Justice: Original. Edition. Harvard University Press.
35.
RileyJ (1990) Utilitarian ethics and democratic government. Ethics100: 335–348.
36.
RobertsHCowlsJHineE, et al. (2021) Achieving a “good AI society”: comparing the aims and progress of the EU and the US. Science and Engineering Ethics27: 68. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7.
37.
RomeleA (2022) Images of artificial intelligence: a blind spot in AI ethics. Philosophy & Technology35: 4. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-022-00498-3.
38.
RubelAClintonCAdamP (2021) Algorithms and Autonomy: The Ethics of Automated Decision Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
RyanMStahlBC (2021) Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society19: 61–86. DOI: 10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138.
41.
SaqueteETomásDMoredaP, et al. (2020) Fighting post-truth using natural language processing: a review and open challenges. Expert Systems with Applications141: 112943. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112943.
42.
ScanlonTM (2003) The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SchudsonM (1978) Discovering the News : A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
44.
SharmaKQianFJiangH, et al. (2019) Combating fake news: a survey on identification and mitigation techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10(21): 1–42. DOI: 10.1145/3305260.
45.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (2014) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York London: Routledge.
46.
SiaperaEFarrelS (2019) Activist and radical journalism. In: The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–7. DOI: 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0115.
47.
Sinnott-ArmstrongW (2021) Consequentialism. In: ZaltaEN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
SmetsAHendrickxJPieterB (2022) We’re in this together: a multi-stakeholder approach for news recommenders. Digital Journalism1–19.
50.
Society of Professional Journalists (2014) SPJ Code of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Society of Professional Journalists. URL: https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp (accessed 2.17.23).
51.
WhittakerJP (2019) Tech Giants, Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Journalism. London, UK: Routledge Research in Journalism, Taylor & Francis.
52.
WonseokJChunJWKimSKangYW (2021) The effects of anthropomorphism on how people evaluate algorithm-written news. Digital Journalism.
53.
YuYHuangK (2021) Friend or foe? Human journalists’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in Chinese media outlets. Chinese Journal of Communication14(4): 409–429.
54.
ZhangWPérez Tornero JoséM (2021) Introduction to AI journalism: framework and ontology of the trans-domain field for integrating AI into journalism. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies12(3): 333–353.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
