Since implementing its latest impartiality guidelines in October 2021, the BBC has rebuked several of its news presenters for related violations. BBC journalists are required to adhere to these norms, so why are some expressing defiance? In light of the BBC’s vast global reach and reputation for journalistic impartiality, this article uses social network and discourse analysis to explore how contemporary journalism is challenging the norm of impartiality. Drawing upon network analysis of the Twitter accounts of BBC journalists and a qualitative content analysis of their Twitter feeds vis-à-vis BBC’s impartiality guidelines, this study examines the relationship between their positions and roles with their discourse on the news online network. Based on our findings, journalists’ roles have a significant impact on their use of discursive approaches and stances on the subject of impartiality when transitioning from a regimen of balance to a regimen of due impartiality.
BastianMHeymannSJacomyM (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media3(1): 361–362.
BrüggemannMEngesserS (2017) Beyond false balance: how interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change42: 58–67.
11.
CanterLBrookesD (2016) Twitter as a flexible tool: how the job role of the journalist influences tweeting habits. Digital Journalism4(7): 875–885.
12.
CushionSLewisJ (2017) Impartiality, statistical tit-for-tats and the construction of balance: UK television news reporting of the 2016 EU referendum campaign. European Journal of Communication32(3): 208–223.
13.
EsserFUmbrichtA (2014) The evolution of objective and interpretative journalism in the Western press: comparing six news systems since the 1960s. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly91(2): 229–249.
FerligojADoreianPBatageljV (2011) Positions and roles. In: ScottJCarringtonPJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, 434–446.
16.
HanitzschTHanuschFMelladoC, et al. (2011) Mapping journalism cultures across nations: a comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies12(3): 273–293.
17.
HanuschFBrunsA (2017) Journalistic branding on Twitter: a representative study of Australian journalists’ profile descriptions. Digital journalism5(1): 26–43.
18.
HermidaA (2013) #Journalism: reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital journalism1(3): 295–313.
19.
LasorsaDLLewisSCHoltonAE (2012) Normalising Twitter: journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies13(1): 19–36.
20.
LawrenceRGMolyneuxLCoddingtonM, et al. (2014) Tweeting Conventions: political journalists' use of Twitter to cover the 2012 presidential campaign. Journalism Studies15(6): 789–806.
MolyneuxLHoltonALewisSC (2018) How journalists engage in branding on Twitter: individual, organisational, and institutional levels. Information, Communication and Society21(10): 1386–1401.
27.
MourãoRR (2015) The boys on the timeline: political journalists’ use of Twitter for building interpretive communities. Journalism16(8): 1107–1123.
RyfeMD (2006) The nature of news rules. Political Communication23(2): 203–214.
34.
SalgadoSStrombackJ (2012) Interpretive journalism: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 144–161.
35.
SalgadoSStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2016) Interpretive journalism. In: Comparing Political Journalism. Milton Park: Routledge, 50–70.
36.
SchudsonM (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism2(2): 149–170. DOI: 10.1177/146488490100200201.
37.
SchumacherNFMaurerPNuernbergkC (2021) Towards new standards? Interaction patterns of German political journalists in the twittersphere. The International Journal of Press/Politics28(1): 257–277.
38.
UsherNNgYMM (2020) Sharing knowledge and “microbubbles”: epistemic communities and insularity in US political journalism. Social Media+ Society6(2): 2056305120926639.
39.
Wahl-JorgensenKBerryMGarcia-BlancoI, et al. (2017) Rethinking balance and impartiality in journalism? How the BBC attempted and failed to change the paradigm. Journalism18(7): 781–800.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
