The COVID-19 pandemic has proved fertile ground for disinformation, confronting journalists with several challenges. Not only have they faced an unprecedented flood of fabricated stories, but they also had to report about a crisis while experiencing it themselves. This study analyses how journalists made sense of disinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparing the perceptions of journalists in South Africa and France, countries which are in the Global South and Global North, respectively, offers a new lens to the study of journalistic discourse and its functions in relation to the context it emerges from. Based on in-depth interviews with journalists in South Africa and France, this study argues that while journalistic discourses present many similarities when making sense of pandemic-related disinformation, they follow different patterns when discussing and affirming their professional authority in the face of this phenomenon.
BakirVMcStayA (2017) Fake news and the economy of emotions. Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism6(2): 154–175.
2.
BennettWLLivingstonS (2018) The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication33(2): 122–139.
3.
BennettWLGressettLAHaltomW (1985) Repairing the news: a case study of the news paradigm. Journal of Communication35: 50–68.
4.
BergerG (1996) The internet: a goldmine for editors and journalists. Paper Presented at the World Editors Forum. Washington, DC. Available at: https://guyberger.ru.ac.za/fulltext/Goldmine.htm.
5.
BerglezPNassangaG (2015) What is the difference between cross-national comparisons and semi-comparative work? Example of Swedish-Ugandan climate change communication research. Journal of Development and Communication Studies4: 33.
6.
BourdieuP (2005) The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: BensonRNeveuÉ (eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 29–47.
7.
BourdinPCaronJ-C (2018) L’homme politique et la presse. De Camille Desmoulins à Emile de Girardin. Presses universitaires Blaise Pascal.
8.
CarlsonM (2015) The many boundaries of journalism. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism. Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 1–18.
9.
CarlsonM (2016) Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory26: 349–368.
10.
ChalabyJK (1998) The Invention of Journalism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
CheruiyotDFerrer-ConillR (2018) “Fact-checking Africa”: epistemologies, data and the expansion of journalistic discourse. Digital Journalism6(8): 964–75.
12.
ChupinINolletJ (2006) Journalisme et dépendances. Paris, France: L'Harmattan.
13.
CornuD (2009) Journalisme et vérité. Genève, Switzerland: Labor et Fides.
14.
DanielsG (2018) Fight for Democracy: The ANC and the Media in. South Africa: Wits University Press.
15.
DelanoA (2020) Whose truth is it anyway?British Journalism Review31(2): 17–18.
16.
DoutreixMBarbeL (2019) Légitimer et disqualifier: les Fake News saisies comme opportunité de normalisation du champ journalistique. Études de Communication53: 49–66.
17.
DowneyJ (2020) Comparative communication research: why we really need some more fuzzy thinking. International Journal on Communication14: 5787.
18.
Elishar-MalkaVArielYWeimannG (2020) Rethinking political communication in the digital sphere. Journal of International Communication26: 190.
19.
EsserFHanitzschT (2012) On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In: EsserFHanitzschT (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 3–22.
20.
HadlandA (2012) Africanising three models of media and politics: the South African experience. In: HallinDCManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 96–118.
21.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HanitzschT (2009) Comparative journalism studies: gearing up for cross-national research. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 413–427.
23.
HanitzschTVosTP (2017) Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: the discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory27: 115–135.
24.
JacobsS (2019) Media in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
25.
JouxAPélissierM (2018) L’information d’actualité au prisme des fake news. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
26.
KuhnR (2017) The mediatization of presidential leadership in France: the contrasting cases of Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande. French Politics15: 57–74.
27.
LewisSC (2020) The objects and objectives of journalism research during the coronavirus pandemic and beyond. Digital Journalism8(5): 681–689.
28.
LivingstoneS (2003) On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication18: 477.
29.
LivingstoneS (2012) Challenges to Comparative Research in a globalising media landscape. In: EsserFHanitzschT (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 415–429.
30.
MagnussonEMarecekJ (2015) Doing Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Learner's Guide. Cambridge, UK: ambridge University Press.
31.
MareAMunoriyarwaA (2022) Guardians of truth? Fact-checking the 'disinfodemic' in Southern Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of African Media Studies14(1): 63–79.
32.
McNairB (2017) Fake News: Falsehood, Fabrication and Fantasy in Journalism. Routledge.
33.
MelladoCHellmuellerLDonsbachW (2016) Journalistic Role Performance: Concepts, Contexts, and Methods. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
34.
MelladoCHellmuellerLMárquez-RamírezM, et al. (2017) The hybridization of journalistic cultures: a comparative study of journalistic role performance. Journal of Communication67: 944–967.
35.
MichailidouATrenzH-J (2021) Rethinking journalism standards in the era of post-truth politics: from truth keepers to truth mediators. Media, Culture & Society43(7): 1340–1349. DOI: 10.1177/01634437211040669.
36.
NeveuÉ (2019) Sociologie du journalisme. Paris, France: La Découverte.
37.
PereiraFHMastrellaB (2022) The practice of data-driven journalism in Brazil: between disruption and the reinstatement of professional values. Digital Journalism10(4): 599–625.
38.
PerreaultGPerreaultMFMaaresP (2022) Metajournalistic discourse as a stabilizer within the journalistic field: journalistic practice in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Practice16(2-3): 365–383.
39.
PfetschB (2013) Political Communication Cultures in Europe: Attitudes of Political Actors and Journalists in Nine Countries. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
RieffelR (2017) La liberté de la presse au prisme des contraintes économiques, technologiques et sociales. In: LetteronR (ed) La liberté de la presse écrite au XXIe siècle. Paris, France: CNRS Editions, 193–206.
42.
RingootR (2014) Analyser le discours de presse. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
43.
RingootRRuellanD (2007) Journalism as permanent and collective invention. Brazilian Journalism Research3(2): 67–76.
44.
RingootRUtardJ-M (2005) Le journalisme en invention. In: Nouvelles pratiques, nouveaux acteurs. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
45.
RuellanD (2011) Nous, journalistes. Déontologie et identité. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
46.
SantosPMareA (2021) The reconfiguration of news work in southern Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital Journalism9(9): 1391–1410.
47.
SchapalsAKBrunsA (2022) Responding to “Fake news”: journalistic perceptions of and reactions to a delegitimising force. Media and Communication10(3): 5–16.
48.
StauntonCSwanepoelCLabuschaigneM (2020) Between a rock and a hard place: COVID-19 and South Africa’s response. Journal of Law and the Biosciences7(1): lsaa052.
49.
TandocJELimZWLingR (2018) Defining “Fake News”. A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism6(2): 137–153.
50.
TandocJEJenkinsJCraftS (2019) Fake news as a critical incident in journalism. Journalism Practice13(6): 673–689.
51.
WardleC (2018) The need for smarter definitions and practical, timely empirical research on information disorder. Digital Journalism6(8): 951–963.
52.
WassermanH (2013) Press Freedom in Africa: Comparative Perspectives. Oxfordshire,UK: Routledge.
53.
WassermanH (2018) Media, Geopolitics, and Power: A View from the Global South. Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
54.
WassermanH (2020) Fake news from Africa: panics, politics and paradigms. Journalism21(1): 3–16.
55.
WassermanHde BeerA (2005) Which public? Whose interest? The South African Media and its role during the first ten years of democracy. Critical Arts19(1- 2): 36–51.
56.
ZelizerB (1990) Achieving journalistic authority through narrative. Critical Studies in Mass Communication7(4): 366–376.
57.
ZelizerB (1993) Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication10(3): 219–237.
