This study sought to examine the potential role of news avoidance in belief in COVID-19 misinformation. Using two-wave panel survey data in Singapore, we found that information overload is associated with news fatigue as well as with difficulty in analyzing information. News fatigue and analysis paralysis also subsequently led to news avoidance, which increased belief in COVID-19 misinformation. However, this link is present only among those who are frequently exposed to misinformation about COVID-19.
AikenLSSteinJABentlerPM (1994) Structural equation analyses of clinical subpopulation differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology62: 488–499.
2.
ApukeODOmarB (2021) Social media affordances and information abundance: Enabling fake news sharing during the COVID-19 health crisis. Health Informatics Journal27(3): 14604582211021470.
3.
BawdenDRobinsonL (2020) Information overload: an introduction. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1360. (accessed 2020-06-30).
4.
BeamMAHutchensMJHmielowskiJD (2016) Clicking vs. sharing: the relationship between online news behaviors and political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior59: 215–220.
5.
CabañesJVA (2020) Digital disinformation and the imaginative dimension of communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(2): 435–452. DOI: 10.1177/1077699020913799.
6.
ChaMGaoWLiC-T (2020) Detecting fake news in social media: an Asia-Pacific perspective. Commun. ACM63(4): 68–71.
7.
ChenY-CShangR-AKaoC-Y (2009) The effects of information overload on consumers’ subjective state towards buying decision in the internet shopping environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications8(1): 48–58.
8.
D’AngeloJDTomaCL (2017) There are plenty of fish in the sea: the effects of choice overload and reversibility on online daters’ satisfaction with selected partners. Media Psychology20(1): 1–27.
9.
DavidCCSan PascualMRSTorresMES (2019) Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement. PloS one14(3): e0212263–e0212263.
10.
de BruinKde HaanYVliegenthartR, et al. (2021) News avoidance during the Covid-19 crisis: understanding information overload. Digital Journalism9(9): 1286–1302.
11.
DrummondCSiegristMÁrvaiJ (2020) Limited effects of exposure to fake news about climate change. Environmental Research Communications2(8): 081003.
12.
EdgerlyS (2017) Seeking out and avoiding the news media: young adults’ proposed strategies for obtaining current events information. Mass Communication and Society20(3): 358–377.
13.
EdgerlySVragaEKBodeL, et al. (2017) New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95(1): 192–212.
14.
FazioLKBrashierNMPayneBK, et al. (2015) Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General144(5): 993–1002.
15.
GolmanRHagmannDLoewensteinG (2017) Information Avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature55(1): 96–135.
16.
GoyanesMArdèvol-AbreuAGil de ZúñigaH (2021) Antecedents of news avoidance: competing effects of political interest, news overload, trust in news media, and “news finds me” perception. Digital Journalism. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097.
17.
GrahamJW (2009) Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology60: 549–576.
18.
GruppFWJr (1970) Newscast avoidance among political activists. The Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 262–266.
19.
HairJFBlackWBabinB, et al. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
HoltonAEChyiHI (2012) News and the overloaded consumer: factors influencing information overload among news consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking15(11): 619–624.
21.
HowellJLShepperdJA (2016) Establishing an information avoidance scale. Psychological Assessment28(12): 1695–1708.
22.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
23.
JensenJDCarcioppoloNKingAJ, et al. (2014) The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Education and Counselling94(1): 90–96.
24.
KalogeropoulosAFletcherRNielsenRK (2020) Initial Surge in News Use Around Coronavirus in the UK Has Been Followed by Significant Increase in News Avoidance. Rochester, NY: SSRN. (accessed on 6 June 2020).
25.
KlineRB (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
LaatoSIslamAKMNIslamMN, et al. (2020) What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?European Journal of Information Systems29(3): 288–305.
27.
LazerDBaumMGrinbergN, et al. (2017) Combating Fake News: An Agenda for Research and Action. MA: Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.
28.
LingR (2020) Confirmation bias in the era of mobile news consumption: the social and psychological dimensions. Digital Journalism8(5): 596–604.
29.
MatsunagaM (2008) Item parceling in structural equation modeling: a primer. Communication Methods and Measures2(4): 260–293.
30.
MilesAVoorwindenSChapmanS, et al. (2008) Psychologic predictors of cancer information avoidance among older adults: the role of cancer fear and fatalism. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers17(8): 1872–1879.
31.
Ministry of Communications and Information (2020) Clarifications: Misinformation, Rumours Regarding COVID-19. Singapore: Ministry of Communications and Information.
32.
MoellerJde VreeseC (2015) Spiral of political learning: the reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research46(8): 1078–1094.
33.
MourãoRRRobertsonCT (2019) Fake news as discursive integration: an analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. Journalism Studies20(14): 2077–2095.
34.
NewmanN (2019) Executive Summary and Key Findings of the 2019 Report. Oxford, UK: Digital News Report (accessed on 1 November 2019).
35.
OppenheimC (1997) Managers’ use and handling of information. International Journal of Information Management17: 239–248.
36.
ParkCS (2019) Does too much news on social media discourage news seeking? Mediating role of news efficacy between perceived news overload and news avoidance on social media. Social Media + Society5(3): 2056305119872956.
37.
ParkCSKayeBK (2019) Mediating roles of news curation and news elaboration in the relationship between social media use for news and political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media63(3): 455–473.
38.
ParkJ-YJangS (2013) Confused by too many choices? Choice overload in tourism. Tourism Management35: 1–12.
39.
PennycookGCannonTDRandDG (2018) Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General147(12): 1865–1880.
40.
PentinaITarafdarM (2014) From “information” to “knowing”: Exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption. Computers in Human Behavior35: 211–223.
41.
RanWYamamotoMXuS (2016) Media multitasking during political news consumption: a relationship with factual and subjective political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior56: 352–359.
42.
ScheibehenneBGreifenederRToddPM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research37(3): 409–425.
43.
SchudsonM (2008) Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
44.
Singapore (2020) Population in Brief 2020. Reportno. Report Number, Date. Place Published. Institution.
45.
SkovsgaardMAndersenK (2020) Conceptualizing news avoidance: towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies21(4): 459–476.
46.
SongHJungJKimY (2016) Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitudinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4): 1172–1190.
47.
StanleyAJClipshamPS (1997) Information overload—Myth or reality?IEE Colloquium (Digest)97(340): 1–4.
48.
StanovichKE (2018) Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning24(4): 423–444.
SweenyKMelnykDMillerW, et al. (2010) Information avoidance: who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology14(4): 340–353.
51.
TandocE (2021) Singapore. Reuters Institute Digital News Report (accessed on 5 July 2021).
52.
TandocEHuangADuffyA, et al. (2020) To share is to receive: news as social currency for social media reciprocity. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies9(1): 3–20.
53.
TandocELeeJCB (2020) When Viruses and Misinformation Spread: How Young Singaporeans Navigated Uncertainty in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Outbreak. 24(3): 778-796.New Media & Society. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820968212.
54.
TandocELimZWLingR (2017) Defining “fake news:” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism6(2): 137–153.
55.
ThomasZ (2020) WHO Says Fake Coronavirus Claims Causing 'Infodemic. London, UK: BBC. (accessed on 22 March 2020).
56.
Van den BulckJ (2006) Television news avoidance: exploratory results from a one-year follow-up study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 231–252.
