Although most research to date has focused on leading US fact-checkers, similar initiatives are gaining strength all over the world. This study draws on a globally disseminated questionnaire, plus interviews with fact-checkers on four continents, to examine their role and reach in relation to other journalistic enterprises, as well as the challenges they face. A conceptual framework of journalistic boundary-setting helps guide the exploration.
AmazeenMA (2019) Practitioner perceptions: Critical junctures and the global emergence and challenges of fact-checking. International Communication Gazette81(6–8): 541–561.
3.
AmazeenMA (2020) Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism21(1): 95–111.
BrandtzaegPBFølstadAChaparro DomínguezMÁ (2018) How journalists and social media users perceive online fact-checking and verification services. Journalism Practice12(9): 1109–1129.
6.
CarlsonM (2015) Introduction: The many boundaries of journalism. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
7.
CarlsonM (2016) Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory26(4): 349–368.
8.
CeniteMDetenberBHKohAWK, et al. (2009) Doing the right thing: A survey of bloggers’ ethical beliefs and practices. New Media & Society11(4): 575–597.
9.
ClaytonKBlairSBusamJA, et al. (2019) Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior. Epub ahead of print 11February2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0.
10.
CoddingtonMMolyneuxLLawrenceRG (2014) Fact checking the campaign: How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not). International Journal of Press/Politics19(4): 391–409.
11.
DobbsM (2012) The Rise of Political Fact-checking. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.
12.
EldridgeSA (2016) The digital journalist: The journalistic field, boundaries, and disquieting change. In: FranklinBEldridgeSA (eds) The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 44–54.
13.
GarrettRKNisbetECLynchEK (2013) Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication63(4): 617–637.
14.
GottfriedJAHardyBWWinnegKM, et al. (2013) Did fact checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign?American Behavioral Scientist57(11): 1558–1567.
15.
GravesL (2016) Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
GravesL (2017) Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking. Communication, Culture & Critique10(3): 518–537.
17.
GravesL (2018) Boundaries not drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movement. Journalism Studies19(5): 613–631.
18.
GravesLNyhanBReiflerJ (2016) Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication66(1): 102–138.
19.
GynnildA (2016) Journalism innovation leads to innovation journalism: The impact of computational exploration on changing mindsets. Journalism15(6): 713–730.
20.
HaasT (2006) From “public journalism” to the “public’s journalism”? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs. Journalism Studies6(3): 387–396.
21.
HarrisonJ (2010) User-generated content and gatekeeping at the BBC Hub. Journalism Studies11(2): 243–256.
22.
HawkinsJM (2017) Textual analysis. In: AllenM (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1754–1756.
23.
HermidaA (2015) Nothing but the truth: Redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 37–50.
24.
JamiesonKH (2015) Implications of the demise of “fact” in political discourse. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society159(1): 66–84.
25.
JarmanJ (2016) Motivated to ignore the facts: The inability of fact-checking to promote truth in the public sphere. In: HannanJ (ed.) Truth in the Public Sphere. New York: Lexington Books, pp. 115–134.
26.
KuhnM (2007) Interactivity and prioritizing the human: A code of blogging ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics22(1): 18–36.
27.
KusMEberweinTPorlezzaC, et al. (2017) Training or improvisation? Citizen journalists and their educational backgrounds – a comparative view. Journalism Practice11(2–3): 355–372.
28.
LewisSC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
29.
LewisSCUsherN (2016) Trading zones, boundary objects, and the pursuit of news innovation: A case study of journalists and programmers. Convergence22(5): 543–560.
30.
LimC (2018) Checking how fact-checkers check. Research & Politics. Epub ahead of print 19July2018. DOI: 10.1177/2053168018786848.
31.
LowreyW (2006) Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship. Journalism7(4): 477–500.
32.
MariettaMBarkerDCBowserT (2015) Fact-checking polarized politics: Does the fact-check industry provide consistent guidance on disputed realities?The Forum13(4): 577–596.
33.
MathesonDD (2004) Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society6(4): 443–468.
34.
MoonR (2018) Getting into living rooms: NGO media relations work as strategic practice. Journalism19(7): 1011–1026.
35.
NieminenSRapeliL (2019) Fighting misperceptions and doubting journalists’ objectivity: A review of fact-checking literature. Political Studies Review17(3): 296–309.
36.
NyhanBReiflerJ (2010) When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior32(2): 303–330.
37.
ÖrnebringH (2013) Anything you can do, I can do better? Professional journalists on citizen journalism in six European countries. International Communication Gazette75(1): 35–53.
38.
PerlmutterDDSchoenM (2007) “If I break a rule, what do I do, fire myself?” Ethics codes of independent blogs. Journal of Mass Media Ethics22(1): 37–48.
39.
PowersM (2018) NGOs as Newsmakers: The Changing Landscape of International News. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
SchudsonMAndersonC (2009) Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 108–121.
41.
SingerJB (2015) Out of bounds: Professional norms as boundary markers. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21–36.
42.
SingerJB (2018) Fact-checkers as entrepreneurs: Scalability and sustainability for a new form of watchdog journalism. Journalism Practice12(8): 1070–1080.
43.
ThorsonE (2016) Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication33(3): 460–480.
44.
TongJ (2015) Chinese journalists’ views of user-generated content producers and journalism: A case study of the boundary work of journalism. Asian Journal of Communication25(6): 600–616.
45.
UscinskiJEButlerRW (2013) Epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review25(2): 162–180.
46.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2015) Resisting epistemologies of user-generated content? Cooptation, segregation and the boundaries of journalism. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 169–185.
47.
WallM (2005) “Blogs of war”: Weblogs as news. Journalism6(2): 153–172.
48.
WalterNCohenJHolbertRL, et al. (2019) Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication37(3): 350–375.
