This article uses the history of news agencies, particularly in Germany, to explore key theories about media transitions. First, many over-emphasize technology as an autonomous factor divorced from politics, economics, and culture. Historical methodologies remind us that technology is socially constructed, as I show using the example of wireless technology. Second, the economic dominance of platforms has become central to the debate about how to reform the Internet. This too draws on long-standing conceptual approaches to media, pioneered by Habermas. Like online platforms, news agencies were bottlenecks for news; their history reminds us that their dominance stemmed from politics as much as economics. Finally, I suggest that we need to include Bourdieu’s ideas of symbolic power and institutions to understand why certain media firms became so central. To understand news agencies, we can thus combine the work of Habermas and Bourdieu with theories about the social construction of technology to retrace the interaction between politics, economics, technology, and social norms that imbued news agencies with such power for so long.
AkamiT (2012) Japan’s News Propaganda and Reuters’ News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870–1934. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.
2.
AkamiT (2014) Soft Power of Japan’s Total War State: The Board of Information and Dōmei News Agency in Foreign Policy, 1934–45. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.
3.
AustinJL (1975) How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AverbeckS (1999) Kommunikation als Prozess: Soziologische Perspektiven in der Zeitungswissenschaft, 1927–1934 [Communication as Process: Sociological Perspectives in Newspaper Science, 1927–1934]. Münster: Lit.
5.
BasseD (1991) Wolff’s Telegraphisches Bureau 1849 bis 1933: Agenturpublizistik zwischen Politik und Wirtschaft [Wolff’s Telegraph Bureau 1849 to 1933: Agency Journalism between Politics and the Economy]. Munich: K.G. Saur.
6.
BielsaE (2008) The pivotal role of news agencies in the context of globalization: A historical approach. Global Networks8: 347–366.
7.
BijkerWEHughesTPPinchTJ (eds) (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8.
BlondheimM (1994) News over the Wires: The Telegraph and the Flow of Public Information in America, 1844–1897. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BoneaA (2016) The News of Empire: Telegraphy, Journalism, and the Politics of Reporting in Colonial India, c. 1830–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BorgmannA (2005) Technology. In: DreyfusHLWrathallMA (eds) A Companion to Heidegger. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 420–433.
11.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
Boyd-BarrettORantanenT (eds) (1998) The Globalization of News. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
Boyd-BarrettOThussuDK (1992) Contra-Flow in Global News: International and Regional News Exchange Mechanisms. London: J. Libbey.
14.
BrendebachJ (2018) Towards a new international communication order? UNESCO, development, and ‘national communication policies’ in the 1960s and 1970s. In: BrendebachJHerzerMTworekHJS (eds) International Organizations and the Media in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: Exorbitant Expectations. London: Routledge, pp. 158–181.
15.
BrennanJR (2015) The Cold War battle over global news in East Africa: Decolonization, the free flow of information, and the media business, 1960–1980. Journal of Global History10(2): 333–356.
16.
BriggsABurkeP (2002) A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
BroersmaM (2010) Journalism as performative discourse: The importance of form and style in journalism. In: RuparV (ed.) Journalism and Meaning-Making: Reading the Newspaper. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 15–36.
18.
BrunhuberR (1907) Das moderne Zeitungswesen (System der Zeitungslehre) [The State of the Modern Newspaper (System of Newspaper Education)]. Leipzig: G. J. Göschen.
19.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex
’. New York: Routledge.
20.
ButschR (ed.) (2007) Media and Public Spheres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
CanosaR (2002) La voce del duce: L’agenzia Stefani: L’arma segreta di Mussolini [The Voice of Il Duce: The Stefani Agency: Mussolini’s Secret Weapon]. Milan: Mondadori.
22.
CouldryN (2004) Media meta-capital: Extending the range of Bourdieu’s field theory. In: SwartzDZolbergV (eds) After Bourdieu: Influence, Critique, Elaboration. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 165–192.
23.
CrossleyNRobertsJM (eds) (2004) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
DarntonR (2000) An early information society: News and the media in eighteenth-century Paris. American Historical Review105: 1–35.
25.
DaviesN (2008) Flat Earth News: An Award-Winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media. London: Chatto & Windus.
26.
DesbordesR (2008) Representing ‘informal empire’ in the nineteenth century. Media History14(2): 121–139.
DörflerEPensoldW (2001) Die Macht der Nachricht: die Geschichte der Nachrichtenagenturen in Österreich [The Power of News: The History of News Agencies in Austria]. Vienna: Molden.
29.
DrewR (2016) Technological determinism. In: BurnsG (ed.) A Companion to Popular Culture. Chicester: Wiley, pp. 167–183.
30.
DreyfusH (2006) Heidegger on the connection between nihilism, art, technology, and politics. In: GuignonCB (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–372.
31.
EdgertonD (1999) From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. History and Technology16(2): 111–136.
32.
EdgertonD (2006) The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. London: Profile Books.
33.
EleyG (1992) Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 289–339.
34.
FearJ (2009) Cartels. In: JonesGZeitlinJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 268–292.
35.
GöhlerG (1995) Macht der Öffentlichkeit–Öffentlichkeit der Macht [The Power of the Public Sphere: The Public Sphere of Power]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
36.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. T Burger). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37.
HabermasJ (1990[1962]) Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: Inquiries into a Category of Bourgeois Society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
38.
HabermasJ (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 421–461.
39.
HamiltonJMTworekHJS (2017) The natural history of the news: An epigenetic study. Journalism: Theory, Criticism, Practice18(4): 391–407.
40.
HansenN (1914) Depeschenbureaus und internationales Nachrichtenwesen [Wire bureaus and the state of international news]. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv3: 78–96.
41.
HardtH (2001) Social Theories of the Press: Constituents of Communication Research, 1840s to 1920s, 2nd edn.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
HeadrickD (1991) The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
ImhofK (1996) Öffentlichkeit als historische Kateogrie und als Kategorie der Historie [The public sphere as a historical category and category of history]. Schweizersiche Zeitschrift für Geschichte46(1): 3–25.
44.
IonescuC (2001) Agențiile de presă din România: 1889–1999 [Press Agencies in Romania: 1889–1999]. Bucharest: Editura Tritonic.
45.
KapfingerH (1932) Das Nachrichtenwesen [The state of news]. In: NaumannJW (ed.) Die Presse und der Katholik. Anklage und Rechtfertigung. Handbuch für Vortrag und Unterricht [The Press and the Catholic. Accusation and Exculpation. Handbook for Lectures and Teaching]. Augsburg: Verlag Haas & Grabherr, pp. 178–202.
46.
KeaneJ (1995) Structural transformations of the public sphere. The Communication Review1(1): 1–22.
47.
LefébureA (1992) Havas: les arcanes du pouvoir [Havas: The Secrets of Power]. Paris: B. Grasset.
48.
LepriS (2001) L’agenzia Stefani da Cavour a Mussolini: Informazione e potere in un secolo di storia Italiana [The Stefani Agency from Cavour to Mussolini: News and Power in a Century of Italian History]. Florence: Le Monnier.
49.
LöblE (1903) Kultur und Presse [Culture and Press]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
50.
Müller-DoohmS (2016) Habermas: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press.
51.
MüllerSM (2015) Beyond the means of 99 percent of the population: Business interests, state intervention, and submarine telegraphy. Journal of Policy History27(3): 439–464.
52.
MüllerSM (2016a) From cabling the Atlantic to wiring the world: A review essay on the 150th anniversary of the Atlantic telegraph cable of 1866. Technology and Culture57(3): 507–526.
53.
MüllerSM (2016b) Wiring the World: The Social and Cultural Creation of Global Telegraph Networks. New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
MüllerSMTworekHJS (2015) The telegraph and the bank’: On the interdependence of global communications and capitalism, 1866–1914. Journal of Global History10(2): 259–283.
55.
MüllerSMTworekHJS (2016) Imagined use as a category of analysis: New approaches to the history of technology. History and Technology32(2): 105–119.
56.
NalbachA (1999) ‘The ring combination’: Information, power, and the world news agency cartel, 1856–1914. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
57.
NalbachA (2003) ‘Poisoned at the source’? Telegraphic news services and big business in the nineteenth century. Business History Review77(4): 577–610.
PalmerM (1976a) De l’information etrangère dans la presse quotidienne francaise: les agences de presse et le journalisme anglo-saxon (1875–1885) [Foreign news in the French daily press: News agencies and anglophone journalism (1875–1885)]. Revue d’Histoire Moderne & Contemporaine23: 203–235.
60.
PalmerM (1976b) L’Agence Havas, Reuters et Bismarck. L’echec de la triple alliance télegraphique (1887–1889) [Havas, Reuters and Bismarck. The failure of the telegraphic triple alliance (1887–1889)]. Revue d’histoire diplomatique90: 321–357.
61.
ParkR (1923) The natural history of the newspaper. American Journal of Sociology29(3): 273–289.
62.
PinkertonADoddsK (2009) Radio geopolitics: Broadcasting, listening and the need for acoustic spaces. Progress in Human Geography33(1): 10–27.
63.
RantanenT (1990) Foreign News in Imperial Russia: The Relationship between International and Russian News Agencies, 1856–1914. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedaekatemia.
64.
RantanenT (1992) Mr. Howard Goes to South America. The United Press Associations and Foreign Expansion (Roy W. Howard Monographs in Journalism and Mass Communication Research). Indianapolis, IN: School of Journalism, Indiana University.
65.
RantanenT (1994) Howard Interviews Stalin. How the AP, UP and TASS Smashed the International News Cartel (Roy W. Howard Monographs in Journalism and Mass Communication Research). Indianapolis, IN: School of Journalism, Indiana University.
66.
RantanenT (2006) Foreign dependence and domestic monopoly: The European news cartel and U.S. associated presses, 1861–1932. Media History12(1): 19–35.
67.
ReadD (1999) The Power of News: The History of Reuters, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
SchwedlerW (1922) Die Nachricht im Weltverkehr: Kritische Bemerkungen über das internationale Nachrichtenwesen vor und nach dem Weltkriege [News in World Traffic: Critical Remarks about International News before and after the World War]. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte.
69.
ShuS (2015) Managing international news-agency relations under the Guomindang: China’s central news agency, Zhao Minheng, and Reuters, 1931–1945. Frontiers of History in China10(4): 594–644.
70.
Silberstein-LoebJ (2012) Exclusivity and cooperation in the supply of news: The example of the Associated Press, 1893–1945. Journal of Policy History24(3): 466–498.
71.
Silberstein-LoebJ (2014) The International Distribution of News: The Associated Press, Press Association, and Reuters, 1848–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
StandageT (1998) The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s On-Line Pioneers. New York: Walker & Co.
TworekHJS (2016) How not to build a world wireless network: German–British rivalry and visions of global communications in the early twentieth century. History and Technology32(2): 178–200.
79.
TworekHJS (2019) News from Germany: The Competition to Control World Communications, 1900–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
TworekHJSJohnR (2019) Global communications. In: da Silva LopesTLubinskiCTworekHJS (eds) The Routledge Companion to the Makers of Global Business. London: Routledge, pp. 315–331.
81.
TworekHJSJohnR (in press) Publicity, propaganda, and public opinion from the Titanic disaster to the Hungarian uprising. In: BlairADuguidPGoeingA, et al. (eds) Information: A Historical Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
UNESCO (1980) Many Voices, One World. Toward a New, More Just and More Efficient World Information and Communication Order. London and New York: UNESCO.
83.
VermehrenC (1999) Bourdieu and media studies. In: GrenfellMKellyM (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Language, Culture, and Education: Theory into Practice. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 187–196.
84.
WarnerM (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone.
85.
WenzlhuemerR (2007) The dematerialization of telecommunication: Communication centres and peripheries in Europe and the world, 1850–1920. Journal of Global History2(3): 345–372.
86.
WenzlhuemerR (2012) Connecting the Nineteenth-Century World: The Telegraph and Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87.
WilkeJ (2004) Die telegraphischen Depeschen des Wolff’schen Telegraphischen Büros (WTB) [The telegraphic messages of Wolff’s Telegraph Bureau (WTB)]. Publizistik49(2): 125–151.
88.
WilliamsF (1953) Transmitting World News: A Study of Telecommunications and the Press, International Propaganda and Communications. Paris: UNESCO.
89.
WinseckDPikeRM (2007) Communication and Empire: Media, Markets, and Globalization, 1860–1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
