Immigration is a dramatic challenge for Europe: the press has a large influence in determining the opinion climate at this regard. This article investigates how a selection of newspapers in Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Italy covers the immigration issue from 1 January 2013 to 30 April 2014, before and after the Lampedusa shipwreck on 3 October 2013. Departing from the hypothesis that the media ownership may have a large influence on the content of the news, we investigate 12 different media companies in conjunction with other variables that may affect the coverage of the topic as well. A quantitative content analysis has been first used to derive information from a collection of 2602 articles retrieved through a set of specific keywords from different online database. Afterward, a Multiple Correspondence Analysis has been performed to explore and synthetize the collected information into a small number of ‘factors’.
AalbergTBeyerA (2015) Human interest framing of irregular immigration: An empirical study of public preferences for personalized news stories in the United States, France, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 858–875.
2.
AbdiHValentinD (2007) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. In: SalkindNJ (ed.) Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 651–657.
3.
AlbaekEvan DalenAJebrilN, et al. (2014) Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AltheideDL (1985) Media Power. London: SAGE.
5.
BakerCE (2006) Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BensonR (2009) What makes news more multiperspectival? A field analysis. Poetics37(5–6): 402–418.
7.
BensonR (2013) Shaping Immigration News: A French American Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonRHallinDC (2007) How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US national press, 1965–97. European Journal of Communication22(1): 27–48.
9.
BensonRWoodT (2015) Who says what or nothing at all? Speakers, frames, and frameless quotes in unauthorized immigration news in the United States, Norway, and France. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 802–821.
10.
BensonRNeffTHessérusM (2018) Media ownership and public service news: How strong are institutional logics?The International Journal of Press Politics23: 275–298.
11.
BeyerAMatthesJ (2015) Public perceptions of the media coverage of irregular immigration comparative insights from France, the United States, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 839–857.
12.
BinghamAConboyM (2015) Tabloid Century: The Popular Press in Britain, 1896 to the Present. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing.
13.
CarpenterS (2010) A Study of Content Diversity in Online Citizen Journalism and Online Newspaper Articles. New Media & Society12(7): 1064–1084.
14.
CitrinJ (2014) National Identity and the Challenge of Immigration. In: Dell’ortoGBirckfieldV (eds) Reporting at the Southern Borders: Journalism and Public Debates on Immigration in the U.S. and the E.U. London: Routledge, pp. 17–31.
15.
DahlgrenPSparksC (1992) Journalism and Popular Culture. London: SAGE.
16.
DeaconDSmithD (2017) The politics of containment: Immigration coverage in UK General Election news coverage (1992–2015). Journalism. Epub ahead of print 4 July. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917715944.
17.
DeSwertKDe SmedtJ (2014) Hosting Europe, covering Europe? Domestication in the EU-coverage on Belgian television news (2003–2012). In: StepinskaA (ed) Media and communication in Europa. Berlin: Logos Verlag, pp. 33–44.
18.
Di FrancoG (2006) Corrispondenze Multiple E Altre Tecniche Multivariate Per Variabili Categoriali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
19.
Di FrancoG (2016) Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology50(3): 1299–1315.
20.
DoyleG (2015) Why ownership pluralism still matters in a multi-platform world. In: ValckePSukosdMPicardR (eds) Media Pluralism and Diversity. London: Palgrave, pp. 279–305.
21.
EntmanRM (1989) Democracy without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43: 51–58.
23.
FerreeMMGamsonWAGerhardsJ, et al. (2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
25.
GleissnerMde VreeseCH (2005) News about the EU constitution: Journalistic challenges and media portrayal of the European Union constitution. Journalism6(2): 221–242.
26.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27.
GreenacreMBlasiusJ (2006) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
28.
HallinDC (2015) The dynamics of immigration coverage in comparative perspective. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 876–885.
29.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LeeNYBaekKKunPJ, et al. (2018) Self-coverage for public interest or self-promotion: How media cross-ownership structures affect news content in South Korea. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 26 March. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918763503.
MasiniAVan AelstPZerbackT, et al. (2017) Measuring and explaining the diversity of voices and viewpoints in the news. Journalism Studies19: 2324–2343.
33.
NivenD (2003) Objective evidence on media bias: News-paper coverage of congressional party switchers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80(2): 311–326.
34.
PanisKVan den BulckHVerschraegenB, et al. (2015) Does media cross-ownership translate into cross-promotion?Journalism Studies16(6): 868–886.
35.
SantinMRubiraR (2014) Promotional practices in news programs: The case of Spanish public television. International Journal of Communication8: 810–829.
36.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message. Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman.
37.
TerryC (2013) Cross-promotion, self-promotion effects in news media. McMaster Journal of Communication10: 8–13.
38.
ThorbjørnsrudK (2015) Framing irregular immigration in Western media. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 771–782.
39.
TriandafylidouAMaroukisT (2012) Migrant Smuggling. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
40.
FigenschouTUThorbjørnsrudK (2015) Faces of an invisible population: Human interest framing of irregular immigration news in the United States, France, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist59(7): 783–801.
41.
van CuilenburgJ (1998) Diversity revisited: Towards a critical-rational approach to media performance. In: BrantsKHemesJVan ZoonenL (eds) The Media in Question. London: SAGE, pp. 38–50.
42.
van CuilenburgJ (1999) On competition, access and diversity in media, old and new. New Media and Society1(2): 183–207.
43.
van KempenH (2007) Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication24(3): 303–320.
44.
VizcarrondoT (2012) Changes in and challenges with the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rules: Can lessons be learned?Southwestern Mass Communication Journal27(2): 67–77.
45.
VoakesPSKapferJKurpiusD, et al. (1996) Diversity in the news: A conceptual and methodological framework. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73(3): 582–593.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
