China has regularly claimed to have been intentionally and systematically misrepresented by Western media. That said, their general characterization of China is said to see improvement with the initial impetus coming from Beijing’s hosting of Olympic Games in 2008. China’s representation in Western media has now entered what many observers considered to be an ‘age of uncertainty’, and it differs greatly from China’s projected self-image. This study examines US, UK versus Chinese media coverage of ‘China’s rise’ from 2009 to 2017. Our analysis entails a 2.2 million-word corpus of news texts retrieved from six leading national newspapers. A combination of computer-assisted corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis was used to identify and compare linguistic elements as well as the structural dimensions that denote the journalistic positioning across large corpora. We argue that the globalist positioning stands in a dialectical relationship to the nationalist positioning. Globalism may be used to frame press narratives when it is viewed as suiting national interest, and this dynamic differs between the United States, the United Kingdom and China.
AlexanderMGLevinSHenryPJ (2005) Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology26(1): 27–45.
2.
BakerPGabrielatosCMcEneryT (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BakerPGabrielatosCKhosravinikM, et al. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306.
4.
BeesonMLiF (2016) China’s place in regional and global governance: A new world comes into view. Global Policy7(4): 491–499.
5.
BellDA (2015) The China Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BremmerI (2018) Us Vs. Them. New York: Portfolio.
7.
BrownSAW (2017) Power, Perception and Foreign Policymaking. London: Routledge.
8.
CoxM (2017) The rise of populism and the crisis of globalisation: Brexit, Trump and beyond. Irish Studies in International Affairs28: 9–17.
9.
EsserF (2013) The emerging paradigm of comparative communication enquiry: Advancing cross-national research in times of globalization. International Journal of Communication7(2): 113–128.
10.
FukuyamaF (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
11.
GaoJIngramCKeeP (2016) Global Media and Public Diplomacy in Sino-western Relations. London: Routledge.
GustersonH (2017) From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist44(2): 209–214.
14.
HaidtJ (2016) When and why nationalism beats globalism. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas32(3): 46.
15.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KangLChuYH (2015) China’s rise through world public opinion: Editorial introduction. Journal of Contemporary China24(92): 197–202.
17.
LamsL (2016) China: Economic magnet or rival? Framing of China in the Dutch-and French-language elite press in Belgium and the Netherlands. International Communication Gazette78(1–2): 137–156.
18.
LeeCC (2002) Established pluralism: US elite media discourse about China policy. Journalism Studies3(3): 343–357.
19.
LeeCC (2010) Bound to rise: Chinese media discourses on the new global order. In: CurtinMShahH (eds) Reorienting Global Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 260–283.
20.
LeeCCChanJMPanZ, et al. (2002) Global Media Spectacle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
LiH (2015) The Chinese model of development and its implications. World Journal of Social Science Research2(2): 128.
22.
MaguireJA (2011) The global media sports complex: Key issues and concerns. Sport in Society14(7–8): 965–977.
RaysonP (2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4): 519–549.
25.
ReisiglM (2017) The discourse-historical approach. In: FlowerdewJRichardsonJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 44–59.
26.
RosenboimO (2017) The Emergence of Globalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ScottoJTSandersDReiflerJ (2018) The consequential Nationalist–Globalist policy divide in contemporary Britain: Some initial analyses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties28(1): 38–58.
29.
SongYLeeCC (2017) ‘Collective memories’ of global media events: Anniversary journalism of the Berlin Wall and Tiananmen crackdown in the Anglo-American elite press, 1990–2014. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism. Epub ahead of print 21 July 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917720304.
30.
StubbsM (2001) Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
31.
TojeA (2018) Will China’s Rise Be Peaceful?New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Van DijkTA (2000) On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration. In: ReisiglMWodakR (eds) The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, pp. 85–103.
33.
WodakR (2001) The discourse-historical approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis1: 63–94.
34.
WodakRMeyerM (eds) (2009) Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
35.
WodakRReisiglM (2001) The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Vrlag.
36.
WomackB (2015) China and the future status quo. The Chinese Journal of International Politics8(2): 115–137.
37.
ZhangLWuD (2017) Media representations of China: A comparison of China daily and financial times in reporting on the belt and road initiative. Critical Arts31(6): 29–43.
ZhaoY (2012) Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. In: HallinDCManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Johanneshov: Myndigheten För Tillgängliga Medier, pp. 143–176.
