Discursive construction of Syrian refugees in shaping international public opinion: Turkey’s public diplomacy efforts

Abstract

This research focuses on the Turkish government’s communications with the international community with regard to Syrian refugees. I use the Discourse Historical Approach to reveal and compare the discursive strategies that the official Turkish news agency has used as part of its public diplomacy efforts in their mass communication efforts regarding Syrian refugees during the last 8 years. The results reveal how a humanitarian issue such as the plight of refugees might be employed to establish a government’s political position, affirm its involvement and influence public opinion about a conflict that exceeds national boundaries and has turned into a challenge for international dominance involving world superpowers. The topics highlighted in the Turkish news reports and the argumentations that these reports put forward reveal that the Turkish government is highly critical of the international community, especially Western powers, for not fulfilling their humanitarian responsibilities. This specific criticism from Turkey regarding its outsized role in hosting refugees has become a leverage point to claim a place in the decision table about the future of Syria.

Keywords

Anadolu Agency critical discourse analysis Discourse Historical Approach news agencies news releases public diplomacy Syrian refugees Turkey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anadolu Ajansı History (2018) History of Anadolu Agency from its foundation to the present. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/p/history (accessed 2 October 2018).

Anholt

Hildreth

(2005) Let freedom and cash registers ring: America as a brand. Place Branding 1(2): 164–172.

Asante

(2014) Facing South to Africa: Toward an Afrocentric Critical Orientation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Beaumont

Smith

(2019) Erdoğan: I’ll let Syrian refugees leave Turkey for west unless safe zone set up. The Guardian, 5 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/05/erdogan-ill-let-syrian-refugees-leave-turkey-for-west-unless-safe-zone-set-up (accessed 30 October).

Bigo

(2002) Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(1): 63–92.

Chavez

(2001) Covering Immigration: Popular Images and the Politics of a Nation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Cisneros

(2008) Contaminated communities: The metaphor of ‘immigrant as pollutant’ in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 11: 569–601.

Dimitrova

Ozdora

Connolly-Ahern

(2018) On the border of the Syrian refugee crisis: Views from two different cultural perspectives. American Behavioral Scientist 62(4): 532–546.

Fairclough

(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.

10.

Fairclough

(1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

11.

Fairclough

Wodak

(1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van Dijk

(ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 258–284.

12.

Fitzgerald

Curtis

Corliss

(2012) Anxious publics worries about crime and immigration. Comparative Political Studies 45(4): 477–506.

13.

Gabrielatos

Baker

(2008) Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press 1996- 2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38.

14.

Grunig

(1993) Public relations and international affairs: Effects, ethics and responsibility. Journal of International Affairs 47(1): 137–162.

15.

Guilfoyle

Hancock

(2009) Discourses and refugees’ social inclusion: Introduction to method and issues. Tamara: Journal of Critical Organization Inquiry 8(1–2): 123–132.

16.

Hercowitz-Amir

Raijman

Davidov

(2017) Host or hostile? Attitudes towards asylum seekers in Israel and in Denmark. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 58(5): 416–439.

17.

KhosraviNik

(2009) The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society 20(4): 477–498.

18.

Klocker

Dunn

(2003) Who’s driving the asylum debate? Newspaper and government representations of asylum seekers. Media International Australia 109: 71–93.

19.

Kunczik

(1997) Images of Nations and International Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Lihua

(2012) Discourse and Manipulation: Stories about China in the New York Times. Language & Communication 32(3): 249–256.

21.

Machin

Van Leeuwen

(2007) Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. New York and London: Routledge.

22.

Mowlana

(2016) The role of media in contemporary international relations: Culture and politics at the crossroads. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 11(1): 84–96.

23.

Phillips

Hardy

(2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

24.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2009) The discourse-historical (DHA). In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 87–121.

25.

Sheafer

Gabay

(2009) Mediated public diplomacy: A strategic contest over international agenda building and frame building. Political Communication 26(4): 447–467.

26.

Tehranian

(2014) Ethnic discourse and the new world disorder: A communitarian perspective. In: Asante

Yoshitaka

Yin

(eds) The Global Intercultural Communication Reader, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp. 431–444.

27.

Tuch

(1990) Communicating with the World: U.S. Public Diplomacy Overseas. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

28.

Turak

(2019) Turkey’s Erdogan threatens to release millions of refugees into Europe over criticism of Syria offensive. CNBC, 10 October. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/10/turkeys-erdogan-threatens-release-of-refugees-to-europe-over-syria-criticism.html (accessed 30 October).

29.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (n.d.) Refugees and asylum seekers in Turkey. Available at: https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-turkey (accessed 14 June 2019).

30.

Van Dijk

(2003) Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Ariel.

31.

Van Dijk

(2006) Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2): 115–140.

32.

Van Gorp

(2005) Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of asylum issue. European Journal of Communication 20(4): 484–507.

33.

Van Leeuwen

(2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Van Leeuwen

Wodak

(1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118.

35.

Vanc

Fitzpatrick

(2016) Scope and status of public diplomacy research by public relations scholars 1990-2014. Public Relations Review 42(3): 432–440.

36.

Wang

(2006) Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review 32(2): 91–96.

37.

Wang

(2007) Telling the American story to the world: The purpose of the U.S. public diplomacy in historical perspective. Public Relations Review 33(1): 21–30.

38.

Wodak

(1996) The genesis of racist discourse in Austria since 1989. In: Coulthard

Coulthard

(eds) Texts and Practices. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 107–128.

39.

Wodak

Meyer

(2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 1–34.

40.

(2014) Chinese Discourse Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

41.

Young

(ed.) (1981) Untying the Text: A Post-Structural Anthology. Boston, MA: Routledge.

42.

Zhang

(2006) Public diplomacy as symbolic interactions: A case study of Asian tsunami relief campaigns. Public Relations Review 32(1): 26–32.