Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study explores the question of how the use of satire, as embedded within the trappings of a traditional news outlet (i.e. a reputable newspaper like the Boston Globe), could influence perceptions of the respective news organization and facets of engagement with it. An online experiment (N = 366) was conducted, offering comparisons both in terms of message features (i.e. a satirical versus conventional presentation of political information) and source attribution cues (i.e. satirical content attributed to a hard news source versus attribution to a satirical outlet). Results indicate that the use of satire may present some risks for a news outlet in terms of undermining reader trust, which can impact audience engagement. However, the results also suggest that the weight of legitimacy and credibility commonly associated with a traditional news outlet can translate into a perception of its satire having a stronger influence on individuals (compared to content from a purely satirical outlet), which can in turn influence the likelihood of sharing the satirical content. Tests of indirect effects highlight the mediating roles of source trust and perceived influence in processes of influence on facets of engagement (i.e. returning to the news source and sharing its content). On the whole, the model of relationships does not appear to be moderated by political party identification.

Keywords

journalism media use news media trust perceived influence political humor satire second-person effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2009) ‘Mouthpiece theater’ ends with apologies. The Washington Post, 9 August.

Berger

Milkman

(2012) What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49: 192–205.

Bobkowski

(2015) Sharing the news: Effects of informational utility and opinion leadership on online news sharing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92: 320–345.

Cappella

Jamieson

(1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.

Caufield

(2008) The influence of ‘infoenterpropagainment’: Exploring the power of political satire as a distinct form of political humor. In: Baumgartner

Morris

(eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–20.

Earle

Cvetkovich

(1995) Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Eveland

McLeod

(1999) The effect of social desirability on perceived media impact: Implications for third-person perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 11: 315–333.

Feldman

(2013) Learning about politics from the daily show: The role of viewer orientation and processing motivations. Mass Communication & Society 16: 586–607.

Fredrickson

(1998) What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2: 300–319.

10.

Gaziano

McGrath

(1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly 63: 451–462.

11.

Glasser

(2009) Journalism and the second-person effect. Journalism 10: 326–328.

12.

Goetz

Keltner

Simon-Thomas

(2010) Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 136: 351–374.

13.

Gray

Jones

Thompson

(2009) Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-network Era. New York: NYU Press.

14.

Gunther

Storey

(2003) The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication 53: 199–215.

15.

Hess

Northrop

(2011) American Political Cartoons: The Evolution of a National Identity, 1754-2010. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

16.

Holbert

Grill

(2015) Clarifying and expanding the use of confirmatory factor analysis in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92: 292–319.

17.

Holbert

Stephenson

(2002) Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research 28: 531–551.

18.

Keltner

Haidt

(1999) Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion 13: 505–521.

19.

Knight

(2004) The Literature of Satire. New York: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Kumar

Combe

(2015) Political parody and satire as subversive speech in the global digital sphere. International Communication Gazette 77: 211–214.

21.

Ladd

(2012) Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

McKain

(2005) Not necessarily not the news: Gatekeeping, remediation, and the daily show. The Journal of American Culture 28: 415–430.

23.

McLeod

Wise

Perryman

(2017) Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perceptions, and their consequences. Review of Communication Research 5: 35–83.

24.

Mindich

(2000) Just the Facts: How ‘Objectivity’ Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.

25.

Mitchell

Gottfried

Kiley

, et al. (2014) Political polarization and media habits. Pew Research Center 21 October. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/

26.

Mullin

(2016) Boston Globe runs satirical front page showing Trump presidency. Poynter.org 10 April. Available at: https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2016/boston-globe-runs-satirical-front-page-showing-trump-presidency/

27.

Myrick

Oliver

(2015) Laughing and crying: Mixed emotions, compassion, and the effectiveness of a YouTube PSA about skin cancer. Health Communication 30: 820–829.

28.

Neuwirth

Frederick

(2002) Extending the framework of third-, first-, and second-person effects. Mass Communication & Society 5: 113–140.

29.

Neuwirth

Frederick

Mayo

(2002) Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research 29: 320–359.

30.

Peifer

(2018) Liking the (funny) messenger: The influence of news parody exposure, mirth, and predispositions on media trust. Media Psychology 21: 529–557.

31.

Perloff

(1999) The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology 1: 353–378.

32.

Rimé

(2007) The social sharing of emotion as an interface between individual and collective processes in the construction of emotional climates. Journal of Social Issues 63: 307–322.

33.

Schudson

(2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2: 149–170.

34.

Sherrick

(2016) The effects of media effects: Third-person effects, the influence of presumed media influence, and evaluations of media companies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93: 906–922.

35.

Skovsgaard

Albæk

Bro

, et al. (2013) A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism 14: 22–42.

36.

Stelter

(2007) Fox cancels a mock news show, citing costs. The New York Times, 20 August. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/business/media/20fox.html

37.

Stroud

Lee

(2013) Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication & Society 16: 67–88.

38.

Test

(1991) Satire: Spirit and Art. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida Press.

39.

Tsfati

Cappella

(2003) Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research 30: 504–529.

40.

Tuchman

(1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology 77: 660–679.

41.

Waisanen

(2011) Crafting hyperreal spaces for comic insights: The onion News Network’s ironic iconicity. Communication Quarterly 59: 508–528.

42.

Weeks

Holbert

(2013) Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90: 212–232.

43.

Whitt

(1983) Status inconsistency: A body of negative evidence or a statistical artifact? Social Forces 62(1): 201–233.

44.

Young

Holbert

Jamieson

(2014) Successful practices for the strategic use of political parody and satire: Lessons from the P6 Symposium and the 2012 election campaign. American Behavioral Scientist 58: 1111–1130.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.47 MB

Risky satire: Examining how a traditional news outlet’s use of satire can affect audience perceptions and future engagement with the news source

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material