This article analyses the alternative media coverage of the 2016 Olympics from the perspective of an emerging literature on ‘platform hijack’ of media events. By conducting a frame analysis (n = 60), we explore the extent to which alternative media producers have sought to seize the attention from the Olympics to their agendas or issues. While they expectedly appeared emphasising the damaging effects over communities, results otherwise suggest no intent to directly ‘hijack’ the Olympics’ platforms, as seen in past episodes of disruptive activism. Instead, we propose interpreting the evidence as indicative of discourse autonomy, which adds nuances to the way in which alternative media producers prefer to remain tied to their local issues even during global media events.
AttonCHamiltonJF (2008) Alternative Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
BaileyOG (2009) Citizen journalism and child rights in Brazil. In: AllanSThorsenE (eds) Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 133–142.
4.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
5.
BonthuysE (2012) The 2010 football World Cup and the regulation of sex work in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies38(1): 11–29.
6.
BoykoffJ (2017) Protest, activism, and the Olympic games: An overview of key issues and iconic moments. The International Journal of the History of Sport34(3–4): 162–183.
7.
BrymanA (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BurchellK (2015) Infiltrating the space, hijacking the platform: Pussy Riot, Sochi protests, and media events. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies12(1): 659–676.
9.
CarvalhoG (2014) Jornalismo alternativo na era digital: Análise de reportagens da Agência Pública. Revista Alterjor2(10): 1–3.
10.
CooperS (2010) The oppositional framing of bloggers. In: D’AngeloPKuypersJA (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 135–155.
11.
CottleS (2008) Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture & Society30(6): 853–872.
12.
CouldryNHeppAKrotzF (2009) Media Events in a Global Age. London: Routledge.
13.
DavisS (2015) Citizens’ media in the Favelas: Finding a place for community-based digital media production in social change processes. Communication Theory25(2): 230–243.
14.
DayanDKatzE (1992) Defining media events: High holidays of mass communication. In: DayanDKatzE (eds) Media Events: The Livebroadcasting of History. London: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–24.
15.
DeuzeM (2006) Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society22(2): 63–75.
16.
DowningJ (2001) Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
EntmanRM (2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57(1): 163–173.
18.
FestaRSilvaC (1986) Comunicação popular e alternativa no Brasil. São Paulo: Paulus.
19.
FordeS (2011) Challenging the News: The Journalism of Alternative and Community Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GaffneyC (2016) Gentrifications in pre-Olympic Rio de Janeiro. Urban Geography37(8): 1132–1153.
21.
GastaldoE (2014) Soccer and media in Brazil. Soccer and Society15(1): 123–131.
22.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
HarcupT (2013) Alternative Journalism, Alternative Voices. London: Routledge.
24.
HolstonJ (2014) ‘Come to the street!’: Urban protest, Brazil 2013. Anthropological Quarterly87(3): 887–900.
25.
HorneJWhannelG (2010) The ‘caged torch procession’: Celebrities, protesters and the 2008 Olympic torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco. Sport in Society13(5): 760–770.
26.
KucinskiB (1991) Jornalistas e Revolucionários. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Página Aberta.
27.
LevyH (2017) Reporting the 2014 World Cup: Football first and social issues last. Sport in Society20: 572–582.
28.
McQuailD (2010) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: SAGE.
29.
MarshallPDWalkerBRussoN (2010) Mediating the Olympics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies16(3): 263–278.
30.
MendonçaRFErcanSA (2015) Deliberation and protest: Strange bedfellows? Revealing the deliberative potential of 2013 protests in Turkey and Brazil. Policy Studies36(3): 267–282.
31.
MiahAGarcíaBZhihuiT (2008) We are the media. In: PriceMEDayanD (eds) Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 320–345.
32.
PeruzzoCMK (2009) Aproximações entre a comunicação popular e comunitária e a imprensa alternativa no Brasil na era do ciberespaço. Galáxia17: 131–146.
33.
PeruzzoCMK (2013) Movimentos sociais, redes virtuais e mídia alternativa no junho em que ‘o gigante acordou’?MATRIZes7(2): 73–93.
34.
PintoOLV (2013) Os protestos no Brasil, ou Sobre como a passagem de ônibus revelou contradições. Badiou Studies2(1): 156–159.
35.
PriceME (2008a) Civil society and the global market for loyalties. In: AlbrowMAnheierHKGlasiusM (eds) Global Civil Society 2007/8: Communicative Power and Democracy. London: SAGE, pp. 46–56.
36.
PriceME (2008b) On seizing the Olympic platform. In: PriceMEDayanD (eds) Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 86–114.
37.
PriceMEDayanD (2009) Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
38.
ReeseSDGandyOHGrantAE (eds) (2001) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. London: Routledge.
RodríguezC (2001) Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens’ Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
41.
RojekC (2013) Event Power: How Global Events Manage and Manipulate. London: SAGE.
42.
StehleMWeberBM (2013) German soccer, the 2010 World Cup, and multicultural belonging. German Studies Review36(1): 103–124.
43.
TomlinsonA (2014) Olympic legacies: Recurrent rhetoric and harsh realities. Contemporary Social Science9(2): 137–158.
44.
GorpBV (2010) Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In: Doing news framing analysis.London: Routledge, pp. 100–125.
45.
WetherellMPotterJ (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour.London: SAGE.
46.
WoitowiczKJ (2009) Recortes da Mídia Alternativa: Histórias da comunicação no Brasil. Ponta Grossa, Brazil: UEPG.
47.
YuH (2013) Blogging the Beijing Olympics. In: HutchinsBRoweD (eds) Digital Media Sport: Technology, Power and Culture in the Network Society. London: Routledge, pp. 186–203.
