This study investigates influences on gatekeeping processes that have the potential to cause biased media coverage. We tested whether and, if so, to what extent journalists’ and organizational interests affect journalistic news processing. In a content analysis, we contrasted the press coverage (n = 1199 articles) of trade disputes of newspaper journalists with the coverage of other trade disputes. Results indicate both coverage and statement bias. In their coverage of newspaper disputes, journalists evaluated employers’ offers significantly more negatively, framed industrial action as legitimate, and criticized employers’ behavior during strikes.
ArreseAVaraA (2015) Divergent perspectives? Financial newspapers and the general interest press. In: PicardRG (ed.) Euro Crisis in the Media: Journalistic Coverage of Economic Crisis and European Institutions (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism). London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 149–176.
2.
BreedW (1955) Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces33(4): 326–335.
3.
BrüggemannM (2014) Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory24(1): 61–82.
4.
BusternaJCHansenKA (1990) Presidential endorsement patterns by chain-owned papers, 1976–84. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly67(2): 286–294.
5.
D’AlessioDAllenM (2000) Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication50(4): 133–156.
6.
DonsbachW (2004) Psychology of news decisions factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism5(2): 131–157.
7.
DouglasSU (1986) Labor’s New Voice: Unions and the Mass Media (Communication and information science). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.
8.
DruckmanJNParkinM (2005) The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics67(4): 1030–1049.
9.
EberlJ-MBoomgaardenHGWagnerM (2015) One bias fits all? Three types of media bias and their effects on party preferences. Communication Research44: 1125–1148.
10.
EberlJ-MWagnerMBoomgaardenHG (2017) Are perceptions of candidate traits shaped by the media? The effects of three types of media bias. The International Journal of Press/Politics22(1): 111–132.
11.
EildersC (2008) Massenmedien als Produzenten öffentlicher Meinungen — Pressekommentare als Manifestation der politischen Akteursrolle. In: PfetschBAdamS (eds) Massenmedien als politische Akteure. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 27–51.
12.
EngelmannI (2010) Journalistische Instrumentalisierung von Nachrichtenfaktoren. Einflüsse journalistischer Einstellungen auf simulierte Issue-, Quellen- und Statement-Entscheidungen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft58: 525–543.
13.
EsserF (1998) Editorial structures and work principles in British and German newsrooms. European Journal of Communication13(3): 375–405.
14.
FerreeMMGamsonWAGerhardsJ, et al. (2002) Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society31(3): 289–324.
15.
FlegelRCChaffeeSH (1971) Influences of editors, readers, and personal opinions on reporters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly48(4): 645–651.
16.
GerritsLSchellerH (2016) Die Steuerpläne von Bündnis 90/Die Grünen zur Bundestagswahl 2013 im Spiegel der Printmedien – Framing entlang »redaktioneller Linien«?Zeitschrift für Politik63(2): 135–155.
17.
Gil de ZúñigaH (2015) European public sphere. Toward a European public sphere? The promise and perils of modern democracy in the age of digital and social media. International Journal of Communication9: 3152–3160.
18.
GlasmanLRAlbarracínD (2006) Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin132(5): 778–822.
GrosecloseTMilyoJ (2005) A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics120(4): 1191–1237.
21.
GunsterS (2008) Listening to labour: Mainstream media, talk radio, and the 2005 B.C. teachers strike. Canadian Journal of Communication33(4): 661–683.
22.
HagenLM (1993) Opportune witnesses: An analysis of balance in the selection of sources and arguments in the leading German newspapers’ coverage of the census issue. European Journal of Communication8(3): 317–343.
23.
HagenLM (2013) Informationsqualität von Nachrichten: Meßmethoden und ihre Anwendung auf die Dienste von Nachrichtenagenturen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
24.
HanitzschTMelladoC (2011) What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in eighteen countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 404–426.
25.
HanitzschTVosTP (2017) Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory27(2): 115–135.
26.
HartmannP (1975) Industrial relations in the news media. Industrial Relations Journal6(4): 4–18.
27.
HermanES (1985) Diversity of news: ‘Marginalizing’ the opposition. Journal of Communication35(3): 135–146.
28.
JohnsonBEaglyA (1989) Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin106(2): 290–314.
29.
KeatingJPBrockTC (1974) Acceptance of persuasion and the inhibition of counterargumentation under various distraction tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology10(4): 301–309.
30.
KenneyKSimpsonC (1993) Was coverage of the 1988 presidential race by Washington’s two major dailies biased?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly70(2): 345–355.
31.
KepplingerHMBrosiusH-BStaabJF (1991) Instrumental actualization: A theory of mediated conflicts. European Journal of Communication6(3): 263–290.
32.
KerrickJSAndersonTESwalesLB (1964) Balance and the writer’s attitude in news stories and editorials. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly41(2): 207–215.
33.
KimM-SHunterJE (1993) Attitude-behavior relations: A meta-analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. Journal of Communication43(1): 101–142.
34.
KnightG (2001) Prospective news: Press pre-framing of the 1996 Ontario public service strike. Journalism Studies2(1): 73–91.
35.
KorpiWShalevM (1979) Strikes, industrial relations and class conflict in capitalist societies. The British Journal of Sociology30(2): 164–187.
36.
KruipG (1999) Das Welt-Bild des Axel Springer Verlags: Journalismus zwischen westlichen Werten und deutschen Denktraditionen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
37.
LacySWatsonBRRiffeD, et al. (2015) Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(4): 791–811.
38.
LarcineseVPuglisiRSnyderJM (2007) Partisan bias in economic news: Evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Working paper no. 13378, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13378 (accessed 20 October 2016).
39.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York; London: The Free Press.
40.
MorrisJS (2007) Slanted objectivity? Perceived media bias, cable news exposure, and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly88(3): 707–728.
41.
PattersonTEDonsbachW (1996) News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication13(4): 455–468.
42.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology19: 123–205.
43.
PrestonP (2008) Making the News: Journalism and News Cultures in Europe. London: Routledge.
44.
ReinemannCBaugutP (2014) Political journalists as communicators: The impact of individual characteristics on their work. In: ReinemannC (ed.) Handbook of Communication Science: Political Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 325–350.
45.
RobinsonGJ (1970) Foreign news selection is non-linear in Yugoslavia’s Tanjug agency. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly47(2): 340–351.
46.
RyanC (2004) It takes a movement to raise an issue: Media lessons from the 1997 U.P.S. strike. Critical Sociology30(2): 483–511.
47.
SchmidtDE (1993) Public opinion and media coverage of labor unions. Journal of Labor Research14(2): 151–164.
48.
SchönbachK (1977) Trennung von Nachricht und Meinung: Empirische Untersuchung eines journalistischen Qualitätskriteriums. Freiburg Breisgau; München: Alber.
49.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, 2nd edn.White Plains, NY: Longman Trade/Caroline House.
50.
ShoemakerPJVosTP (2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
51.
ShoemakerPJEichholzMKimE, et al. (2001) Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(2): 233–246.
52.
SingerJB (2004) More than ink-stained wretches: The resocialization of print journalists in converged newsrooms. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(4): 838–856.
53.
StempelGHWindhauserJW (1989) Coverage by the prestige press of the 1988 presidential campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly66(4): 894–919.
54.
StevensonRLGreeneMT (1980) A reconsideration of bias in the news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly57(1): 115–121.
55.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
56.
TandocECTakahashiB (2014) Playing a crusader role or just playing by the rules? Role conceptions and role inconsistencies among environmental journalists. Journalism15(7): 889–907.
57.
TracyJF (2006) ‘Labor’s monkey wrench’: Newsweekly coverage of the 1962–63 New York newspaper strike. Canadian Journal of Communication31(3): 541–560.
58.
WalshG (1988) Trade Unions and the Media. International Labour Review127: 205.
59.
WatanabeK (2017) Measuring news bias: Russia’s official news agency ITAR-TASS’ coverage of the Ukraine crisis. European Journal of Communication32(3): 224–241.
60.
WilliamsA (1975) Unbiased study of television news bias. Journal of Communication25(4): 190–199.
61.
ZhaoXLiuJSDengK (2013) Assumptions behind intercoder reliability indices. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 419–480.
62.
ZillmannDBryantJ (1985) Selective Exposure to Communication. London: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
