This study advances our understanding of mainstream US journalists’ perceptions of their industry’s ethical climate by extending first- and third-person perception to this domain. These journalists believe that colleagues in their same organization act unethically significantly less often and act ethically significantly more often than those at other organizations and in related industries. The first- and third-person perceptions are a linear function of social distance but are not the mirror image of each other in this domain. In addition to theoretical contributions, suggestions for ways these perceptions can be used to improve journalists’ moral judgment are offered.
BreedW (1955) Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces33: 326–335.
7.
BrosiusH-BEngelD (1996) The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence?International Journal of Public Opinion Research8(2): 142–162.
CohenJMutzDPriceV, et al. (1988) Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. The Public Opinion Quarterly52(2): 161–173.
10.
ColemanRWilkinsL (2004) The moral development of journalists: A comparison with other professions and a model for predicting high quality ethical reasoning. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(3): 511–527.
11.
ColemanRLeeJYYaschurC, et al. (2014) Why be a journalist? Students’ motivations and role conceptions in the new age of journalism. In: Annual convention of the association for education in journalism and mass communication, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6 August.
12.
CornwellJFMKrantzDH (2014) Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support. Judgment and Decision Making9(5): 433–444.
13.
CrawfordECFudgeJHubbardGT, et al. (2013) The mass comm type: Student personality traits, motivations, and the choice between news and strategic communication majors. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator68(2): 104–118.
14.
DuckJMMullinB-A (1995) The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology25(1): 77–93.
15.
DuffyMJFreemanCP (2011) Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use. Journal of Mass Media Ethics26(4): 297–315.
16.
EvelandWPMcLeodDM (1999) The effect of social desirability on perceived media impact: Implications for third-person perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research11(4): 315–333.
17.
EvelandWPNathansonAIDetenberBH, et al. (1999) Rethinking the social distance corollary perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research26(3): 275–302.
18.
ForteA (2004) Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics51(2): 167–173.
19.
FröhlichRQuiringOEngesserS (2012) Between idiosyncratic self-interests and professional standards: A contribution to the understanding of participatory journalism in Web 2.0. Results from an online survey in Germany. Journalism13(8): 1041–1063.
20.
GuntherACThorsonE (1992) Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research19(5): 574–596.
21.
HoorensVRuiterS (1996) The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology26(4): 599–610.
22.
JohanssonB (2005) The third-person effect: Only a media perception?Nordicom Review26(1): 81–94.
23.
JohnsonMGoidelKClimekM (2014) The decline of daily newspapers and the third-person effect: Decline of daily newspapers and third-person effect. Social Science Quarterly95(5): 1245–1258.
24.
KantI (1993) Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals; with ‘On a Supposed Right to Live Because of Philanthropic Concerns’, 3rd edn.Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
25.
KohlbergL (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, 1st edn.Cambridge, MA: Harper & Row.
26.
KohlbergL (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
27.
LeeAMColemanRMolyneuxL (2016) From thinking to doing: Effects of different social norms on ethical behavior in journalism. Journal of Media Ethics31(2): 72–85.
28.
LeeHParkS-A (2016) Third-person effect and pandemic flu: The role of severity, self-efficacy method mentions, and message source. Journal of Health Communication21(12): 1244–1250.
29.
LeoneRBissellKL (2005) Movie ratings and third-person perception. Atlantic Journal of Communication13(4): 272–291.
30.
LoVWeiR (2002) Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(1): 13–33.
31.
McLeanPAJonesDGB (1992) Machiavellianism and business education. Psychological Reports71(1): 57–58.
32.
McLeodDMEvelandWPNathansonAI (1997) Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics an analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research24(2): 153–174.
33.
ManleyGGRussellCJBuckleyMR (2001) Self-enhancing in perceptions of behaving unethically. Journal of Education for Business77(1): 21–27.
34.
MartinKDCullenJB (2006) Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics69(2): 175–194.
35.
MazarNAmirOArielyD (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research45(6): 633–644.
National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) (2017) Code of ethics. Available at: https://nppa.org/code-ethics (accessed 11 April 2018).
39.
OnesDSViswesvaranCSchmidtFL (1996) Group differences in overt integrity tests and related personality variables: Implications for adverse impact and test construction. Annual Conference of theSociety for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 26–28 April, San Diego, CA.
40.
ÖrnebringHMelladoC (2016) Valued skills among journalists: An exploratory comparison of six European nations. Journalism19: 445–463.
41.
PattersonPWilkinsL (2010) Media Ethics: Issues and Cases, 7th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
42.
PaulBSalwenMBDupagneM (2000) The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society3(1): 57–85.
43.
PeckLA (2006) A ‘fool satisfied’? Journalists and mill’s principle of utility. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator61(2): 205–213.
44.
PerloffRM (1993) Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research5(2): 167–184.
45.
PerloffRM (2009) Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In: BryantJOliverMB (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 252–268.
PlaisancePL (2016) Media ethics theorizing, reoriented: A shift in focus for individual-level analyses. Journal of Communication66(3): 454–474.
48.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press (Harvard University Press).
49.
SalwenMBDupagneM (1999) The third-person effect perceptions of the media’s influence and immoral consequences. Communication Research26(5): 523–549.
50.
SchmierbachMBoyleMPMcLeodDM (2008) Understanding person perceptions: Comparing four common statistical approaches to third-person research. Mass Communication and Society11(4): 492–513.
51.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (2013) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective, 3rd edn.New York: Routledge.
52.
SimhaACullenJB (2012) Ethical climates and their effects on organizational outcomes: Implications from the past and prophecies for the future. Academy of Management Perspectives26(4): 20–34.
Tal-OrNTsfatiYGuntherAC (2009) The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In: NabiRLOliverMB (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
57.
TatumC (2017) The bad and the ugly: An examination of ethical lapses of the past year. Available at: http://www.spj.org/rrr.asp?ref=77&t=ethics (accessed 14 March 2017).
58.
TewksburyDMoyPWeisDS (2004) Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication54(1): 138–155.
59.
TiedgeJTSilverblattAHaviceMJ, et al. (1991) Discrepancy between perceived first-person and perceived third-person mass media effects. Journalism Quarterly68(1/2): 141–154.
TrevinoLKWeaverGRReynoldsSJ (2006) Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management32(6): 951–990.
62.
Tsay-VogelM (2016) Me versus them: Third-person effects among Facebook users. New Media & Society18(9): 1956–1972.
63.
VictorBCullenJB (1988) The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly33(1): 101–125.
64.
VoakesPS (1998) What were you thinking? A survey of journalists who were sued for invasion of privacy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly75(2): 378–393.
65.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1986) The American Journalist: A Portrait of U.S. News People and Their Work, 1st edn.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
66.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1996) The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. 1st edn.Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
67.
WeaverDHBeamRABrownleeBJ, et al. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68.
WeiRLoV-hChangC (2015) Endorsements move students to choose candidate. Newspaper Research Journal36(4): 482–494.
69.
WhiteHADillonJF (2000) Knowledge about others’ reaction to a public service announcement: The impact on self persuasion and third-person perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(4): 788–803.
70.
WhiteHASingletaryMW (1993) Internal work motivation: Predictor of using ethical heuristics and motivations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly70(2): 381–392.
71.
WilkinsL (2014) My newsroom made me do it: The impact of organizational climate on ethical decision-making. In: WyattWN (ed.) The Ethics of Journalism: Individual, Institutional and Cultural Influences. New York: I.B. Tauris Publishers, pp. 33–54.
72.
WimbushJCShepardJM (1994) Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics13(8): 637–647.
73.
WuWKooSH (2001) Perceived effects of sexually explicit Internet context: The third-person effect in Singapore. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78: 260–274.
