We report differences in political rhetoric within former East- and West-German journalists’ editorials written during the 7 years immediately following reunification. Whereas the former evoked frames inconsistently and disproportionately conveyed citizens’ possibilities during the 1994–1995 provincial, national, and European election period; the latter framed their rhetoric consistently and did so in overwhelmingly political terms. From these findings, we draw inferences on citizens’ mutual interpretations within authoritarian societies (what is permitted) versus functioning democracies (what is legal), suggesting that only the latter affords the basis for the social construction of democracy.
AgrestiA (1990) Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.
2.
BaylorT (1996) Media framing of movement protest: The case of American Indian protest. The Social Science Journal33(3): 241–255.
3.
BorahP (2013) Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication30(3): 456–473.
4.
BurdaMCHuntJ (2001) From reunification to economic integration: Productivity and the labor market in Eastern Germany. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity32(2): 1–92.
5.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science10: 103–126.
6.
De VreeseCH (2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design13(1): 51–62.
7.
De VreeseCHPeterJSemetkoHA (2001) Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication18(2): 107–122.
8.
DruckmanJN (2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?Journal of Politics63(4): 1041–1066.
9.
Dutta-BergmanMJ (2008) Communicating Health: A Culture-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Enquete-Kommission (1998) Überwindung der Folgen der SED-Diktatur im Prozeß der deutschen Einheit (Deutscher Bundestag 13/11000). Available at: http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/13/110/1311000.asc (accessed 18 January 2017).
11.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20(4): 415–432.
12.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
13.
HagenLM (1997) The transformation of the media system of the former German Democratic Republic after the reunification and its effects on the political content of newspapers. European Journal of Communication12(1): 5–26.
14.
HoffI (2011) Rundfunk nach dem Wendepunkt: Die Integration Ostdeutschlands nach der Wiedervereinigung durch das zweite deutsche Fernsehen, das Deutschlandradio und die Deutsche Welle. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.
15.
JamesP (1996) An election with no losers: The 1994 federal elections in the new Germany. Politics16(1): 23–29.
16.
KunczikM (2001) Media and democracy: Are Western concepts of press freedom applicable in new democracies? In: Bajomi-LázárPHegedüsMPI (eds) Media and Politics. Budapest: Uj Mandátum Könyvkiadó, pp. 59–91.
17.
MatthesJSchemerC (2012) Diachronic framing effects in competitive opinion environments. Political Communication29(3): 319–339.
18.
MeyenMFiedlerA (2013) Journalists in the German Democratic Republic (GDR): A collective biography. Journalism Studies14(3): 321–335.
19.
NeumanWRJustMRCriglerAN (1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
PatelKRushefskyME (2002) The Canadian health care system. In: ThaiKVWimberleyETMcManusSM (eds) Handbook of International Health Care Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 79–98.
21.
PejovicC (2001) Civil law and common law: Two different paths leading to the same goal. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review32(3): 817–841.
22.
PoppingRRobertsCW (2009) Coding issues in modality analysis. Field Methods21(3): 244–264.
23.
PoppingRRobertsCW (2020) Political rhetoric in the Hungarian press during the communist regime. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism21(10): 1502–1521.
24.
PriceVTewksburyD (1997) News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In: BarnettGABosterFJ (eds) Progress in the Communication Sciences, vol. 13. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing, pp. 173–212.
25.
PriceVTewksburyDPowersE (1997) Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research24(5): 481–506.
26.
RobertsCW (2008) ‘The’ Fifth Modality: On Languages That Shape Our Motivations and Cultures. Leiden: Brill Publisher.
27.
RobertsCW (2015) Content analysis. In: WrightJD (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, vol. 4. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 769–773.
28.
RobertsCWLiuH (2014) On the cultural foundations for universal healthcare: Implications from late 20th-century U.S. and Canadian health-related discourse. Journal of Communication64(4): 764–784.
29.
RobertsCWPoppingRPanY (2009) Modalities of democratic transformation: Forms of public discourse within Hungary’s largest newspaper, 1990–7. International Sociology24(4): 498–525.
30.
RobertsCWZuellCLandmannJ, et al. (2010) Modality analysis: A semantic grammar for imputations of intentionality in texts. Quality & Quantity44(2): 239–257.
31.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
32.
SemetkoHAValkenburgPM (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication50(2): 93–109.
33.
SheaferTShenhavSRTakensT, et al. (2014) Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication31(1): 149–167.
34.
SnidermanPMTheriaultSM (2004) The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In: SarisWESnidermanPM (eds) Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Non-attitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Press, pp. 133–165.
35.
Van BenthemJ (2010) Modal Logic for Open Minds. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
36.
Van GorpB (2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication57(1): 60–78.
ZillmannDChenLKnoblochS, et al. (2004) Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to internet news reports. Communication Research31(1): 58–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
