Journalism hackathons are computationally based events in which participants create news product prototypes. In the ideal case, the gatherings are rooted in local community, enabling a wide set of institutional stakeholders (legacy journalists, hacker journalists, civic hackers, and the general public) to gather in conversation around key civic issues. This study explores how and to what extent journalism hackathons operate as a community-based laboratory for translating open data from practitioners to the public. Surfaced from in-depth interviews with event organizers encompassing nine countries, the findings illustrate that journalism hackathons are most successful when collaboration integrates civic organizations and community leaders.
AitamurtoTLewisSC (2013) Open innovation in digital journalism: Examining the impact of open APIs at four news organizations. New Media & Society15(2): 314–331.
2.
AmannKKnorr CetinaKD (1998) Thinking through talk: An ethnographic study of a molecular biology laboratory. Knowledge and Society8: 3–26.
3.
AnannyM (2013) Press-public collaboration as infrastructure: Tracing news organizations and programming publics in application programming interfaces. American Behavioral Scientist57(5): 623–642.
4.
AnannyM (2014) Critical News Making and the Paradox of ‘Do-It-Yourself’ News. In: RattoMBolerBDeibertR (eds) DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 359–372.
5.
AnannyMCrawfordK (2015) A liminal press: Situating news app designers within a field of networked news production. Digital Journalism3(2): 192–208.
6.
AnyaegbunamCRyanLB (2003) Students as citizens: Experiential approaches to reflective thinking on community journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator58(1): 64–73.
7.
BatsellJ (2015) Engaged Journalism: Connecting with Digitally Empowered News Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
BoczkowskiPJ (2015) The material turn in the study of journalism: Some hopeful and cautionary remarks from an early explorer. Journalism16(1): 65–68.
9.
BucherT (2017) ‘Machines don’t have instincts’: Articulating the computational in journalism. New Media & Society19(6): 918–933.
10.
ColemanEG (2013) Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CreswellJW (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
12.
DoingP (2008) Give me a laboratory and I will raise a discipline: The past, present, and future politics of laboratory studies in STS. In: HackettEAmsterdamskaOLynchMWajcmanJ (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–296.
13.
DomingoD (2011) Managing audience participation. In: SingerJHermidaADomingoD, et al. (eds) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 76–95.
14.
DrewKKThomasRJ (2017) From separation to collaboration: Perspectives on editorial–business collaboration at United States news organizations. Digital Journalism6(2): 196–215.
15.
EvansSK (2016) Making sense of innovation: Process, product, and storytelling innovation in public service broadcasting organizations. Journalism Studies19(1): 4–24.
16.
GadePJ (2004) Newspapers and organizational development: Management and journalist perceptions of newsroom cultural change. Journalism & Communication Monographs6(1): 3–55.
17.
GarforthL (2012) In/visibilities of research: Seeing and knowing in STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values37(2): 264–285.
18.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
19.
GrahamP (2004) Hackers and Painters: Big Ideas from the Computer Age. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
20.
GuggenheimM (2012) Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: Changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production. History of the Human Sciences25(1): 99–118.
21.
HemmingwayE (2007) Into the Newsroom: Exploring the Digital Production of Regional Television News. New York: Routledge.
22.
HunsingerJSchrockA (2016) The democratization of hacking and making. New Media & Society18(4): 535–538.
23.
JohnsonPRobinsonP (2014) Civic hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement?Review of Policy Research31(4): 349–357.
24.
JonesGMSemelBLeA (2015) ‘There’s no rules. It’s hackathon’.: Negotiating commitment in a context of volatile sociality. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology25(3): 322–345.
25.
JordanT (2016) A Genealogy of Hacking. Convergence23(5): 528–544.
26.
Knorr CetinaKD (1992) The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In: PickeringA (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–167.
27.
Knorr CetinaKD (2001) Laboratory studies: Historical perspectives. In: SmelserNJBaltesPB (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (vol. 2). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 8232–8238.
28.
KohlerRE (2002) Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-field Border in Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
KomssiMPichlisDRaatikainenM, et al. (2015) What are hackathons for?IEEE Software32(5): 60–67.
30.
KrebsILischkaJA (2017) Is audience engagement worth the buzz? The value of audience engagement, comment reading, and content for online news brands. Journalism20(6): 714–732.
31.
LanosgaGWillnatLWeaverDH, et al. (2017) A breed apart? A comparative study of investigative journalists and US journalists. Journalism Studies18(3): 265–287.
32.
LatourB (1983) Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: BiagioliM (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York; London: Routledge, pp. 258–275.
33.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
LewisSC (2012) From journalism to information: The transformation of the Knight Foundation and news innovation. Mass Communication and Society15(3): 309–334.
35.
LewisSCUsherN (2013) Open source and journalism: Toward new frameworks for imagining news innovation. Media, Culture & Society35(5): 602–619.
36.
LewisSCUsherN (2014) Code, collaboration, and the future of journalism: A case study of the Hacks/Hackers global network. Digital Journalism2(3): 383–393.
37.
LewisSCUsherN (2016) Trading zones, boundary objects, and the pursuit of news innovation: A case study of journalists and programmers. Convergence22(5): 543–560.
38.
LewisSCWestlundO (2015) Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work: A matrix and a research agenda. Digital Journalism3(1): 19–37.
39.
LodatoTJDiSalvoC (2016) Issue-oriented hackathons as material participation. New Media & Society18(4): 539–557.
40.
LynchM (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge.
41.
NielsenRK (2012) How newspapers began to blog: Recognizing the role of technologists in old media organizations’ development of new media technologies. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 959–978.
42.
NissenbaumH (2004) Hackers and the contested ontology of cyberspace. New Media & Society6(2): 195–217.
43.
PickeringA (2010) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
RichterichA (2017) Hacking events: Project development practices and technology use at hackathons. Convergence25(5-6): 1000–1026.
45.
RobinsonS (2011) ‘Journalism as process’: The organizational implications of participatory online news. Journalism & Communication Monographs13(3): 137–210.
46.
SchrockAR (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society18(4): 581–599.
47.
SchrockARShafferG (2017) Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data & Society. Epub ahead of print 1January2017. DOI:10.1177/2053951717690750.
48.
SchudsonM (2015) What sorts of things are thingy? And what sorts of thinginess are there? Notes on stuff and social construction. Journalism16(1): 61–64.
49.
SeidmanI (2013) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
TaylorPA (2005) From hackers to hacktivists: Speed bumps on the global superhighway?New Media & Society7(5): 625–646.
51.
TraweekS (1998) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52.
UsherN (2016) Interactive Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code. Champaign–Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
53.
Van DalenAAlbaekEde VreeseC (2011) Suspicious minds: Explaining political cynicism among political journalists in Europe. European Journal of Communication26(2): 147–162.
54.
WeissRS (1995) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55.
WolfsonT (2014) Activist Laboratories of the 1990’s: The roots of technological determinism in contemporary social movements. Cultural Studies28(4): 657–675.
56.
ZamithRLewisSC (2014) From public spaces to public sphere: Rethinking systems for reader comments on online news sites. Digital Journalism2(4): 558–574.
