Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents findings from 41 in-depth interviews with political journalists, media analysts, and public opinion pollsters in the United States. These interviews document several trends in how journalists assess and cover public opinion. The article shows (1) a growing interest in and reliance on polling aggregator websites fueled by demands for precise predictions, (2) the erosion of news organizations’ abilities to assert independent gatekeeping standards around individual poll results, (3) concerns about the level of in-house expertise within newsrooms to adjudicate between surveys, and (4) changing attitudes about the importance of gatekeeping around public opinion data. These findings reflect an increasingly complex landscape of opinion data, which conventional news organizations appear ill-equipped to navigate.

Keywords

Gatekeeping interviewing political journalism public opinion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

Barthel

(2015) The friendly barbarians: Professional norms and work routines of online journalists in the United States. Journalism 16(3): 376–391.

Andersen

(2000) Reporting public opinion polls: The media and the 1997 Canadian election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research: 12285–12298.

Anderson

(2015) Between the unique and the pattern: Historical tensions in our understanding of quantitative journalism. Digital Journalism 3(3): 349–363.

Anderson

(2017) Social survey reportage: Context, narrative, and information visualization in early 20th century American journalism. Journalism 18(1): 81–100.

Ausserhofer

Gutounig

Oppermann

et al . (2017) The datafication of data journalism scholarship: Focal points, methods, and research propositions for the investigation of data-intensive newswork. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 4 April. DOI: 10.1177/14648849.

Bhatti

Pederson

(2016) News reporting of opinion polls: Journalism and statistical noise. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(1): 129–141.

Bialik

(2014) Pollster predict greater polling error in midterm elections. FiveThirtyEight. Available at: fivethirtyeight.com/features/pollsters-predict-greater-polling-error-in-midterm-elections/ (accessed 15 January 2016).

Blumenthal

(2016) SurveyMonkey and NBC news join forces to take on the 2016 election season. SurveyMonkey, 19 January. Available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/blog/2016/01/19/surveymonkey-nbc-news-join-forces-2016-election-season/ (accessed 5 April 2017).

Butterworth

(2014) Nate Silver and campaign 2012: Sport, the statistical frame, and the rhetoric of electoral forecasting. Journal of Communication 64: 895–914.

10.

Cappella

Jamieson

(1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. New York: SAGE.

12.

Coddington

(2015) Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn. Digital Journalism 3(3): 331–348.

13.

Connelly

(2014) Reading minds: A history of times polling. The New York Times, 26 June. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/times-insider/2014/06/26/times-polling-a-history/ (accessed 17 March 2016).

14.

Converse

(1987) Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

15.

Converse

(1996) The advent of polling and political representation. PS: Political Science and Politics 29(4): 649–657.

16.

Craighill

Clement

(2014) How the polling establishment smacked down the New York Times. The Washington Post, 4 August. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/08/04/how-the-polling-establishment-smacked-down-the-new-york-times/

17.

Druckman

Jacobs

(2015) Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Dunaway

(2011) Poll-centered news coverage: Causes and consequences. In: Goidel

(ed.) Political Polling in the Digital Age: The Challenge of Measuring and Understanding Public Opinion. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, pp. 71–84.

19.

Dupagne

Garrison

(2006) The meaning and influence of convergence: A qualitative case study of newsroom work at the Tampa news center. Journalism Studies 7(2): 237–255.

20.

Fink

Anderson

(2014) Data journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies 16(4): 467–481.

21.

Frankovic

(1998) Public opinion and polling. In: Graber

McQuail

Norris

(eds) The Politics of News: The News of Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 150–171.

22.

Frankovic

(2012) Opinion polls and the media in the United States. In: Holtz-Bacha

Strömbäck

(eds) Opinion Polls and the Media: Reflecting and Shaping Public Opinion. New York: Pagrave Macmillan, pp. 113–134.

23.

Herbst

(1993) Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Herbst

(1998) Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Igo

(2008) The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Kagay

(2000) Continuing evolution in the use of public opinion polls by the New York Times: The 1996 presidential election experience. In: Lavrakas

Traugott

(eds) Election Polls, the News Media, and Democracy. New York: Chatham House Publishers, pp. 23–67.

27.

Kennedy

Blumenthal

Clement

et al . (2017) An evaluation of 2016 election polls in the U.S. report for the American association for public opinion research, 4 May. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/Reports/An-Evaluation-of-2016-Election-Polls-in-the-U-S.aspx (accessed 29 June 2017).

28.

Kim

Weaver

(2001) Traditional, online polls reported differently. Newspaper Research Journal 22(3): 71–85.

29.

Kreiss

(2016) Beyond administrative journalism: Civic skepticism and the crisis in journalism. In: Alexander

Breese

Luengo

(eds) The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–76.

30.

Ladd

Benson

(1992) The growth of news polls in American politics. In: Mann

Orren

(eds) Media Polls in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 19–31.

31.

Lawrence

(2000) Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication 17(2): 93–114.

32.

Lecheler

Kruikemeier

(2016) Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society 18(1): 156–171.

33.

Lee

(2015) Iowa’s Ann Selzer on what journalists need to know about polling. Columbia Journalism Review, 17 November. Available at: http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/ann_selzer_iowa_poll_interview.php (accessed 24 April 2016).

34.

Lepore

(2015) Politics and the new machine: What the turn from polls to data science means for democracy. The New Yorker, 16 Nov. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/11/16/politics-and-the-new-machine (7 May 2017).

35.

Lewis

(2015) Journalism in an era of big data. Digital Journalism 3(3): 321–330.

36.

Meyer

(2002 [1973]) Precision Journalism: A Reporter’s Introduction to Social Science Methods, 4th edn. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

37.

Miller

(2017) Is there a future for surveys? Public Opinion Quarterly 81(S1): 205–212.

38.

Mutz

(1995) Effects of horse-race coverage on campaign coffers: Strategic contributing in presidential primaries. The Journal of Politics 57(4): 1015–1042.

39.

Newport

Shapiro

Ayres

et al . (2013) Polling and democracy: Executive summary of the AAPOR task force report on public opinion and leadership. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(4): 853–860.

40.

Parasie

Dagiral

(2013) Data-driven journalism and the public good: ‘Computer-assisted-reporters’ and ‘programmer-journalists in Chicago’. New Media & Society 15(6): 853–871.

41.

Patterson

(1993) Out of Order. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

42.

Patterson

(2005) Of polls, mountains: U.S. journalists and their use of election surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 716–724.

43.

Rhee

(1996) How polls drive campaign coverage: The Gallup/CNN/USA Today tracking poll and USA Today’s coverage of the 1992 presidential campaign. Political Communication 13: 213–229.

44.

Rosen

(1999) What Are Journalists For? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

45.

Rosenstiel

(2005) Political polling and the new media culture: A case of more being less. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 698–715.

46.

Searles

Ginn

Nickens

(2016) For whom the poll airs: Comparing poll results to television poll coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly 80(4): 943–963.

47.

Sides

(2013) One irony of Nate Silver’s leaving the New York Times. The Monkey Cage, 23 July. Available at: http://themonkeycage.org/2013/07/one-irony-of-nate-silvers-leaving-the-new-york-times/ (accessed 7 May 2017).

48.

Sides

Vavreck

(2013) The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

49.

Silver

(2017) Can you trust Trump’s approval rating polls? Fivethirtyeight, 17 January. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/can-you-trust-polling-in-the-age-of-trump/ (accessed 7 July 2017).

50.

Simpson

(2012) What the future holds for Nate Silver at the New York Times. The Atlantic Wire, 27 November. Available at: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/11/what-future-holds-nate-silver-and-new-york-times/59369/ (accessed 10 April 2013).

51.

Singer

(1997) Still guarding the gate? The newspaper journalist’s role in an on-line world. Convergence 3(1): 72–89.

52.

Spayd

(2016) Want to know what America’s thinking? Try asking. The New York Times, 9 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/public-editor/want-to-know-what-americas-thinking-try-asking.html (accessed 7 July 2017).

53.

Tavory

Timmermans

(2009) Two cases of ethnography: Grounded theory and the extended case method. Ethnography 10: 243–263.

54.

Thorson

Wells

(2016) Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory 26: 309–328.

55.

Toff

(2016) The blind scorekeepers: Journalism, polling, and the battle to define public opinion in American politics. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

56.

Traugott

(2009) Changes in media polling in recent presidential campaigns: Moving from good to ‘average’ at CNN. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. Available at: http://www.shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/r33_traugott.pdf (accessed 15 January 2016).

57.

Traugott

(2012) Methodological trends and controversies in the media’s use of opinion polls. In: Holtz-Bacha

Strömbäck

(eds) Opinion Polls and the Media: Reflecting and Shaping Public Opinion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 69–92.

58.

Tryggvason

Strömbäck

(2018) Fact or fiction? Investigating the quality of opinion poll coverage and its antecedents. Journalism 19(14): 2148–2167.

59.

Usher

(2014) Making News at the New York Times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

60.

Verba

(1996) The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy. The American Political Science Review 90(1): 1–7.

61.

Weaver

McCombs

(1980) Journalism and social science: A new relationship? Public Opinion Quarterly 44(4): 477–494.

62.

Weimann

(1990) The obsession to forecast: Pre-election polls in the Israeli press. Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 396–406.

63.

White

(1950) The ‘gatekeeper’: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly: 27: 383–390.

64.

Wuthnow

(2015) Inventing American Religion: Polls, Surveys, and the Tenuous Quest for a Nation’s Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

65.

Wyman

(2016) Nate Silver unloads on The New York Times. Columbia Journalism Review. Available at: http://www.cjr.org/analysis/fivethirtyeight.php (accessed 7 July 2017).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

The ‘Nate Silver effect’ on political journalism: Gatecrashers,gatekeepers,and changing newsroom practices around coverage of public opinion polls

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material