Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study uses two experimental designs to examine how audiences make genre assessments when encountering media content that blends elements of news and entertainment. Study 1 explores how audiences characterize three different versions of a fictitious political talk show program. Study 2 considers whether audience perceptions of ‘news-ness’ are influenced by shifts in headline angle and source attribution. The implications of audience definitions of news and its social function are discussed.

Keywords

Audience entertainment genre hybrid media infotainment news

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnhurst

Wartella

(1991) Newspapers and citizenship: Young adults’ subjective experiences of newspapers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8: 195–209.

Baym

(2010) From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. London: Paradigm Publishers.

Baym

(2017) Journalism and the hybrid condition: Long-form television drama at the intersections of news and narrative. Journalism 18(1): 11–26.

Bennett

Gressett

Haltom

(1985) Repairing the news: A case study of the news paradigm. Journal of Communication 35(2): 50–68.

Bicchieri

(2005) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Buckingham

(2000) The Making of Citizens. London: Routledge.

Chadwick

(2013) The Hybrid Media System. London: Oxford University Press.

Chayka

(2016) Facebook and Google make lies as pretty as truth. The Verge. Available at: http://www.poynter.org/2010/study-44-of-google-news-users-scan-headlines-but-dont-visit-the-news-sites/100279/ (accessed 18 April 2017).

Clayman

Elliott

Heritage

et al . (2006) Historical trends in questioning presidents 1953-2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36: 561–583.

10.

Coe

Tewksbury

Bond

et al . (2008) Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication 58: 201–219.

11.

Deuze

(2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism 6: 442–464.

12.

Dimock

Doherty

Tyson

(2013) Amid criticism, support for media’s watchdog role stands out. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/8-8-2013%20Media%20Attitudes%20Release.pdf (accessed 18 April 2017).

13.

Edgerly

(2017) Making sense and drawing lines: Young adults and the mixing of news and entertainment. Journalism Studies 18(8): 1052–1069.

14.

Feldman

(2011) Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior 33(3): 407–432.

15.

Fields

(2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th edn. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

16.

Fiske

(1987) Television Culture. New York: Routledge.

17.

Fox

Koloen

Sahin

(2007) No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 51: 213–227.

18.

Gabielkov

Ramachandran

Chaintreau

et al . (2016) Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? In: Proceedings of the ACM 2016 sigmetrics international conference on measurement and modeling of computer science, pp. 179–192. Available at: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01281190/document

19.

Garber

(2009) Shocker of the day: Stewart (still) most trusted newscaster in America. Columbia Journalism Review, 23 July . Available at: http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/shocker_of_the_day_stewart_sti.php (accessed 18 April 2017).

20.

Gil de Zúniga

Hinsley

(2013) The press versus the public: What is ‘good journalism’? Journalism Studies 14: 926–942.

21.

Grim

Shea

(2015) A note about our coverage of Donald Trump’s ‘campaign’. The Huffington Post, 17 July . Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-note-about-our-coverage-of-donald-trumps-campaign_55a8fc9ce4b0896514d0fd66 (accessed 18 April 2017).

22.

Hardy

Gottfried

Winneg

et al . (2014) Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society 17: 329–353.

23.

Heider

McCombs

Poindexter

(2005) What the public expects of local news: Views on public and traditional journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82: 952–967.

24.

Hutchby

(2017) Hybridisation, personalization and tribuneship in the political interview. Journalism 18(1)–: 101–118.

25.

Iyengar

Hahn

(2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59: 19–39.

26.

Knobloch-Westerwick

Lavis

(2017) Selecting serious or satirical, supporting or stirring news? Selective exposure to partisan versus mockery news online videos. Journal of Communication 67: 54–81.

27.

Kohut

Doherty

Dimock

et al . (2012) Cable leads the pack as campaign news source. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/2012%20Communicating%20Release.pdf (accessed 18 April 2017).

28.

Kunda

(1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–498.

29.

Mast

Coesemans

Temmerman

(2017) Hybridity and the news: Blending genres and interaction patterns in new forms of journalism. Journalism 18(1): 3–10.

30.

Mindich

DTZ

(1998) Just the Facts: How ‘Objectivity’ Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.

31.

Mitchell

Gottfried

Kiley

et al . (2014) Political polarization & media habits. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/ (accessed 18 April 2017).

32.

Mutz

Reeves

(2005) The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. The American Political Science Review 99: 1–15.

33.

Pew (2010) Fewer journalists stand out in fragmented news universe. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/2010/10/14/fewer-journalists-stand-out-in-fragmented-news-universe/ (accessed 18 April 2017).

34.

Prior

(2007) Post-broadcast Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Putnam

(2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

36.

Rittenberg

Tewksbury

Casey

(2012) Media preferences and democracy: Refining the ‘relative entertainment preference’ hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society 15: 921–942.

37.

Romenesko

(2010) Study: 44% of Google News users scan headlines, but don’t visit the news sites. Poynter, 19 January. Available at: http://www.poynter.org/2010/study-44-of-google-news-users-scan-headlines-but-dont-visit-the-news-sites/100279/ (accessed 18 April 2017).

38.

Roy

(2016) Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid. Los Angeles Times, 15 November. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-want-to-keep-fake-news-out-of-your-1479260297-htmlstory.html (accessed 18 April 2017).

39.

Rubin

(1984) Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication 34(3): 67–77.

40.

Schudson

(1998) The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.

41.

Tsfati

Meyers

Peri

(2006) What is good journalism? Comparing Israeli public and journalists’ perspectives. Journalism 7: 152–173.

42.

Vraga

Edgerly

Bode

et al . (2012) The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89: 5–22.

43.

Vraga

Tully

(2015) Media literacy messages and hostile media perceptions: Processing of nonpartisan versus partisan political information. Mass Communication and Society 18(4): 422–448.

44.

Wheeler

(2005) News subbing simplified. In: Keeble

(ed.) Print Journalism: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge, pp. 105–115.

45.

Williams

Delli Carpini

(2011) After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Winch

(1997) Mapping the Cultural Space Ofjjournalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB