In today’s high-choice media environment, some scholars are concerned that people selectively consume media content based on personal interests and avoid others, which might lead to audience fragmentation across different content genres. Individually, there might be trade-offs between those genres, especially entertainment versus news. This study analyzed a large user engagement dataset (~40,000 users’ comments) collected from the Chinese information application Toutiao, one of the most popular information distribution platforms in China. The results showed that (1) the commenters were not fragmented between content genres, and (2) the users’ news engagement was positively associated with their entertainment engagement. The findings indicate that the availability of high media choices will not reduce the news engagement of those who have strong interest in entertainment. Instead, news engagement might increase alongside the augmentation of the sum of information engagement. Finally, we discussed the differences between relative news engagement and absolute news engagement.
AalbergTBlekesauneAElvestadE (2013) Media choice and informed democracy: toward increasing news consumption gaps in Europe?The International Journal of Press/politics18(3): 281–303.
3.
AnspachNMJenningsJTArceneauxK (2019) A little bit of knowledge: Facebook’s news feed and self-perceptions of knowledge. Research & Politics6(1): 1–9.
4.
BandyJDiakopoulosN (2020) Auditing news curation systems: a case study examining algorithmic and editorial logic in apple news. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media14(1): 36–47.
5.
BennettS (1998) Young Americans’ indifference to media coverage of public affairs. PS: Political Science and Politics31(3): 535–541.
6.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
7.
BoczkowskiPJMitchelsteinE (2012) How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites: clicking, e-mailing, and commenting. Human Communication Research38(1): 1–22.
8.
ChadwickA (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChaffeeSHMetzgerMJ (2001) The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society4(4): 365–379.
EdgerlySVragaEK (2019) News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism20(6): 807–826.
13.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2017) Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication67(4): 476–498.
14.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2018) Automated serendipity: the effect of using search engines on news repertoire balance and diversity. Digital Journalism6(8): 976–989.
15.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2020) Are Netflix and Spotify subscribers more likely to pay for online news? Comparative analysis of data from six countries. International Journal of Communication14: 3439–3457.
16.
HamiltonJ (2004) All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
KalogeropoulosANegredoSPiconeI, et al. (2017) Who shares and comments on news? A cross-national comparative analysis of online and social media participation. Social Media + Society3(4): 1–12.
18.
KarlsenRBeyerASteen-JohnsenK (2020) Do high-choice media environments facilitate news avoidance? A longitudinal study 1997–2016. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64(5): 794–814.
19.
KobayashiTInamasuK (2015) The knowledge leveling effect of portal sites. Communication Research42(4): 482–502.
20.
KobayashiTHoshinoTSuzukiT (2020) Inadvertent learning on a portal site: a longitudinal field experiment. Communication Research47(5): 729–749.
21.
KsiazekTB (2018) Commenting on the news. Journalism Studies19(5): 650–673.
22.
LarssonAO (2018) The news user on social media. Journalism Studies19(15): 2225–2242.
23.
LeeHYangJ (2014) Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. International Journal of Communication8: 597–617.
24.
LelkesY (2020) A bigger pie: the effects of high-speed Internet on political behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(3): 199–216.
25.
Majó-VázquezSCardenalASGonzález-BailónS (2017) Digital news consumption and copyright intervention: evidence from Spain before and after the 2015 “Link Tax.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(5): 284–301.
26.
MakhortykhMde VreeseCHelbergerN, et al. (2020) We are what we click: understanding time and content-based habits of online news readers. New Media & Society23(9): 2773–2800.
27.
MangoldFScharkowM (2020) How do filtering choices impact the structures of audience networks? A simulation study using data from 26 countries. Communication Methods and Measures14(2): 125–144.
28.
MangoldFStierSBreuerJ, et al. (2021) The overstated generational gap in online news use? A consolidated infrastructural perspective. New Media & Society. Epub Ahead of Print 31 January 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1461444821989972
29.
MukerjeeSYangT (2021) Choosing to avoid? A conjoint experimental study to understand selective exposure and avoidance on social media. Political Communication38(3): 222–240.
30.
MukerjeeSMajó-VázquezSGonzález-BailónS (2018) Networks of audience overlap in the consumption of digital news. Journal of Communication68(1): 26–50.
31.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin.
32.
PengYYangT (2021) Anatomy of audience duplication networks: how individual characteristics differentially contribute to fragmentation in news consumption and trust. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 15 February. DOI: 10.1177/1461444821991559
33.
Porten-CheéPEildersC (2019) Fragmentation in high-choice media environments from a micro-perspective: effects of selective exposure on issue diversity in individual repertoires. Communications44(2): 139–161.
34.
PriorM (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
ReinemannCStanyerJScherrS, et al. (2012) Hard and soft news: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 221–239.
36.
RibeiroMHOttoniRWestR, et al. (2020) Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Barcelona: ACM Press, pp. 131–141. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08313
37.
ScharkowMMangoldFStierS, et al. (2020) How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(6): 2761–2763.
38.
SettleJE (2018) Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SolvollMKLarssonAO (2020) The (non)use of likes, comments and shares of news in local online newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal41(2): 204–217.
40.
SunsteinCR (2006) Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SunsteinCR (2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
TewksburyDRittenbergJ (2012) News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
ThorsonKCotterKMedeirosM, et al. (2019) Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society24(2): 183–200.
44.
TrillingDSchoenbachK (2013) Skipping current affairs: the non-users of online and offline news. European Journal of Communication28(1): 35–51.
45.
TuomchomtamSSoonthornphisajN (2019) Community recommendation for text post in social media: a case study on Reddit. Intelligent Data Analysis23(2): 407–424.
46.
Van AelstPStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association41(1): 3–27.
47.
Van der WurffR (2011) Do audiences receive diverse ideas from news media? Exposure to a variety of news media and personal characteristics as determinants of diversity as received. European Journal of Communication26(4): 328–342.
48.
VermeerSTrillingDKruikemeierS, et al. (2020) Online news user journeys: the role of social media, news websites, and topics. Digital Journalism8(9): 1114–1141.
49.
WebsterJG (2005) Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication55(2): 366–382.
50.
WebsterJGKsiazekTB (2012) The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication62(1): 39–56.
51.
WilliamsBADelli CarpiniMX (2011) After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
YangTPengY (2020) The importance of trending topics in the gatekeeping of social media news engagement: a natural experiment on Weibo. Communication Research. Epub Ahead of Print 19 June 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0093650220933729
53.
YangTMajó-VázquezSNielsenRK, et al. (2020) Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(46): 28678–28683.
54.
YeykelisLCummingsJJReevesB (2018) The fragmentation of work, entertainment, e-mail, and news on a personal computer: motivational predictors of switching between media content. Media Psychology21(3): 377–402.
55.
YuanEKsiazekT (2015) A network analytic approach to audience behavior and market structure: the case of China and the United States. Mass Communication and Society18(1): 58–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
