In recent years, communication scholars have expressed concerns about the diversity of news media content. While we live in an era of ‘news abundance’ – the number of outlets and channels has increased enormously – the available news is argued to have become more of the same, but has it? As empirical evidence is lacking, this article verifies whether newspapers in Flanders (Belgium), over time, have indeed become less diverse in terms of the news stories they cover. Based on data from a longitudinal content analysis of nine Flemish newspapers at four points in time (1983, 1993, 2003, and 2013), it shows that (1) newspapers, in general, have not become more alike in terms of news stories; (2) newspapers with a similar profile (elite/popular) are less diverse than newspapers with dissimilar profiles; and (3) newspapers owned by the same media group (concentration of media ownership) are more alike than independently owned newspapers.
BennettWL (2003) News content: Four information biases that matter. In: BennettWL (ed.) The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman, pp. 41–78.
5.
BesleyJCRobertsMC (2010) Cuts in newspaper staffs change meeting coverage. Newspaper Research Journal31(3): 22–35.
6.
BigmanSK (1948) Rivals in conformity: A study of two competing dailies. Journalism Quarterly25(2): 127–131.
7.
BlumlerJGKavanaghD (1999) The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication16(3): 209–230.
8.
BoczkowskiPJ (2009) Technology, monitoring, and imitation in contemporary news work. Communication, Culture & Critique2(1): 39–59.
9.
BoczkowskiPJ (2010) News at Work: Imitation in an Age of Information Abundance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BoczkowskiPJDe SantosM (2007) When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication24(2): 167–180.
11.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television. New York: New Press.
12.
BromleyM (ed.) (2001) No News Is Bad News: Radio, Television, and the Public. London: Routledge.
13.
BrüggemannMEsserFHumprechtE (2012) The strategic repertoire of publishers in the media crisis: The “five C” scheme in Germany. Journalism Studies13(5–6): 742–752.
14.
CalhounCJ (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. London: The MIT Press.
15.
Centrum voor Informatie over de Media (CIM) (2013) Strategic Cross Media Survey 2012–2013: Results. Brussels: CIM.
16.
ChoiJ (2009) Diversity in foreign news in US newspapers before and after the invasion of Iraq. International Communication Gazette71(6): 525–542.
17.
CurranJ (2010) The future of journalism. Journalism Studies11(4): 464–476.
18.
DaileyLDemoLSpillmanM (2005) The convergence continuum: A model for studying collaboration between media newsrooms. Atlantic Journal of Communication13(3): 150–168.
19.
DavieWRLeeJS (1993) Television news technology: Do more sources mean less diversity?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media37(4): 453–464.
20.
De BensERaeymaeckersK (2010) De Pers in België: het Verhaal van de Belgische Dagbladpers van Gisteren, Vandaag en Morgen, 4th edn.Leuven: Lannoo Campus.
21.
De SchruijvereS (1992) De evolutie van de oplage van de Belgische dagbladpers: 1960–1990. Gent: Rijksuniversiteit Gent.
22.
DevereuxE (2013) Understanding the Media. London: SAGE.
23.
DoyleG (2002) Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media. London: SAGE.
24.
DupagneMGarrisonB (2006) The meaning and influence of convergence: A qualitative case study of newsroom work at the Tampa News Center. Journalism Studies7(2): 237–255.
25.
FooteJSSteeleME (1986) Degree of conformity in lead stories in early evening network TV newscasts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly63(1): 19–23.
26.
FowlerJSShowalterSW (1974) Evening network news selection: A confirmation of news judgment. Journalism Quarterly51(4): 712–715.
27.
FranklinB (1997) Newszak and News Media. London: Arnold.
28.
GamsonWACroteauDHoynesW, et al. (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology18: 373–393.
29.
GandyOH (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
GansH (2003) Democracy and the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
GeorgeL (2007) What’s fit to print: The effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets. Information Economics and Policy19: 285–303.
32.
GitlinT (2003) Media Unlimited. New York: Owl Books.
33.
GroshekJ (2008) Homogenous agendas, disparate frames: CNN and CNN International coverage online. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(1): 52–68.
34.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HartleyJ (1996) Popular Reality. London: Arnold.
36.
HotellingH (1929) Stability in competition. The Economic Journal39(153): 41–57.
37.
JohnsonJFordeS (2011) The silent partner: News agencies and 21st century news. International Journal of Communication5(20): 195–214.
38.
KarppinenK (2013) Rethinking Media Pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.
39.
LacyS (1991) Effects of group ownership on daily newspaper content. The Journal of Media Economics4(1): 35–47.
40.
LacySMartinHJ (2004) Competition, circulation, and advertising. Newspaper Research Journal25(1): 18–39.
41.
LacySSimonTF (1993) The Economics and Regulation of United States Newspapers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42.
LasorsaDLReeseSD (1990) News source use in the crash of 1987: A study of four national media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly67(1): 60–71.
43.
LeeJK (2007) The effect of the internet on homogeneity of the media agenda: A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly84(4): 745–760.
44.
LemertJB (1974) Content duplication by the networks in competing evening newscasts. Journalism Quarterly51(2): 238–244.
45.
LewisJWilliamsAFranklinB (2008) Four rumours and an explanation: A political economic account of journalists’ changing newsgathering and reporting practices. Journalism Practice2(1): 27–45.
46.
McQuailDVan CuilenburgJ (1983) Diversity as a media policy goal: A strategy for evaluative research and a Netherlands case study. International Communication Gazette31(3): 145–162.
47.
NapoliPM (1999) Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication49(4): 7–34.
48.
Noelle-NeumannE (1991) The theory of public opinion: The concept of the spiral of silence. Annals of the International Communication Association14(1): 256–287.
49.
NorrisP (2000) A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
PaulussenSUgilleP (2008) User generated content in the newsroom: Professional and organisational constraints on participatory journalism. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture5(2): 24–41.
SaltzisKDickinsonR (2008) Inside the changing newsroom: Journalists’ responses to media convergence. ASLIB Proceedings60(3): 216–228.
53.
ShoemakerPReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message. New York: Longman.
54.
SilesIBoczkowskiPJ (2012) Making sense of the newspaper crisis: A critical assessment of existing research and an agenda for future work. New Media & Society14(8): 1375–1394.
55.
SingerJQuandtT (2009) Convergence and cross-platform content production. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitszchT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 130–144.
56.
SjøvaagH (2014) Homogenisation or differentiation?Journalism Studies15(5): 511–521.
57.
SoloskiJ (1979) Economics and management: The real influence of newspaper groups. Newspaper Research Journal1(1): 19–29.
58.
SteinerPO (1952) Program patterns and preferences, and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics66(2): 194–223.
59.
Van CuilenburgJ (1999) On competition, access and diversity in media, old and new some remarks for communications policy in the information age. New Media & Society1(2): 183–207.
60.
Van CuilenburgJ (2007) Media diversity, competition and concentration: Concepts and theories. In: De BensE (Ed.) Changing Media – Changing Europe Series, vol. 4. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 25–54.
61.
Van der WurffRVan CuilenburgJ (2001) Impact of moderate and ruinous competition on diversity: The Dutch television market. The Journal of Media Economics14(4): 213–229.
