With a dataset from all 20 Finnish regions spanning a time period from 1950 to 2010, this article analyses how the market share mobility index in newspaper circulation and ownership has developed over time and whether entry and exit have played any significant role therein. It compares the results obtained at the ownership level with those of the newspaper level and infers whether the market share mobility index complements or substitutes the conventional concentration measures. The results show that entry and exit of newspapers have not contributed significantly to the market share mobility index and that analysis of ownership and newspaper circulation yields remarkably different results. Our conjecture that market share mobility would peak in the decade of a severe economic downturn was not indisputably upheld. The results indicate that traditional concentration measures and compound market indices should rather be seen as allies than rivals.
AdelmanIG (1958) A stochastic analysis of the size distribution of firms. Journal of the American Statistical Association53(284): 893–904.
2.
BaldwinJRGoreckiPK (1994) Concentration and mobility statistics in Canada’s manufacturing sector. Journal Industrial Economics42(1): 93–103.
3.
BjörkrothTGrönlundM (2009) Newspaper publishing in four major European markets – current status and trends. On accompanying CD. In: FaustinoPSantosR (eds) The Media as a Driver of the Information Society-Economics, Management, Policies and Technologies.
4.
BjörkrothTGrönlundM (2014) The growth of leading regional newspapers. Nordicom Review35(1): 115–133.
5.
BoyleSESorensenRL (1971) Concentration and mobility: Alternative measures of industry structure. Journal of Industrial Economics19(2): 118–132.
6.
CableJ (1997) Market share behavior and mobility: An analysis and time-series application. Review of Economics and Statistics79(1): 136–141.
7.
CavesREPorterME (1978) Market structure, oligopoly, and stability of market shares. Journal of Industrial Economics26(4): 289–313.
8.
ElzingaKGHogartyTF (1973) The problem of geographic market delineation in antimerger suits. Antitrust Bulletin18: 45–81.
9.
European Commission (2005) DG Competition discussion paper on the application of Article 82 of the Treaty to exclusionary abuses.
10.
FarrellJShapiroC (2010) Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics10(1): 1–39.
11.
FilistrucchiLGerardinDvan DammeE. (2014) Market definition in two-sided markets: Theory and practice. Journal of Competition Law and Economics10(2): 293–339.
12.
FilistrucchiLKleinTJMichielsenT (2011) Assessing unilateral merger effects in a two-sided market: An application to the Dutch daily newspaper market. Tilec Discussion Paper no. 2011-046, 19October.
13.
GortM (1963) Analysis of stability and change in market shares. Journal of Political Economy71(1): 51–63.
14.
GrönlundMBjörkrothT (2011) Newspaper market concentration, competitive pressure and financial performance: The case of Finland. Journal of Media Business Studies8(3): 19–52.
15.
GrossackIM (1965) Towards an integration of static and dynamic measures of industry concentration. Review of Economics and Statistics47(3): 301–308.
16.
HartPEPraisSJ (1956) Analysis of business concentration: A statistical approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General)119(2): 150–191.
17.
HorowitzAHorowitzI (1968) Entropy, Markov processes and competition in the brewing industry. Journal of Industrial Economics16(3): 196–211.
18.
HymerSPashigianP (1962) Turnover of firms as a measure of market behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics44(1): 82–87.
19.
JoskowJ (1960) Rank-shift analysis as a supplement to concentration ratios. Review of Economics and Statistics42(1): 113–116.
20.
JyrkiäinenJ (2012) Newspaper chains in Finland. Journal of Media Business Studies9(2): 7–25.
21.
JyrkiäinenJSavisaariE (2003) Sanomalehdistön nykytila (Present state of the press. In: NordenstrengKWiioOA (eds) Suomen Mediamaisema (Finnish Media Landscape). Helsinki: WSOY.
22.
LehtisaariKKarppinenKHarjuniemiTGrönlundMLindénC-GNieminenHViljakainenA (2012) Media convergence and business models: Responses of Finnish daily newspapers. Research report of Communication Research Centre CRC, Helsinki: Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki.
MelnikAShyOStenbackaR (2008) Assessing market dominance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization68(1): 63–72.
25.
PapadogonasTDroucopoulosV (2006) Market share mobility in Greek manufacturing industries. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics1: 81–94.
26.
PicardR (2002) Chapter 7: Competition in media markets. In: PicardR (ed.) The Economics and Financing of Media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 155–169.
27.
PicardRGrönlundM (2003) A 50 year business history of the Finnish newspaper industry. Research paper presented at the 15th Nordic conference of media and communication research, Kristiansand, 15–17 August.
28.
SalokangasR (1999) From political to national, regional and local – The newspaper structure in Finland. Nordicom Review20(1): 77–105.
29.
SandlerRD (1988) Market share instability in commercial airline markets and the impact of deregulation. Journal of Industrial Economics36(3): 327–335.
