Informal relationships between journalists and politicians have a strategic function in the process of news-making. The aim of this article is to analyse the role of personal affinity between the media and politicians in Spain. This study focuses on the following three specific issues: self-definition of their interactions, degree of influence, and main professional risks and benefits detected. The methodology is based on 45 in-depth interviews (22 journalists, 16 politicians and 7 spin-doctors). The novelty of this article is the analysis of not only the views of journalists but also the perceptions of the political actors. The results demonstrate the relevance and influence of affinity relationships between journalists and politicians. The two types of actors are highlighted as main beneficiaries of direct access to high-quality information sources or the ability to achieve positive news coverage. However, certain risks are also linked to these informal relationships.
AlbækEVan DalenAJabilN. (2014) Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AltheideDLSnowRP (1979) Media Logic. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
3.
BerganzaRVan DalenAChaparroMA (2010) La percepción mutua de las relaciones entre periodistas parlamentarios y miembros del congreso y de su influencia en las agendas política y mediática. Revista de Comunicación9: 7–25.
4.
BlumlerJGGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
5.
BrantsKDe VreeseCMöllerJ. (2010) The real spiral of cynicism? Symbiosis and mistrust between politicians and journalists. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(1): 25–40.
6.
Casero-RipollésA (2008) Modelos de relación entre periodistas y políticos: la perspectiva de la negociación constante. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico14: 111–128.
7.
Casero-RipollésA (2012) El periodismo político en España: algunas características definitorias. In: Casero-RipollésA (ed.) Periodismo Político en España: Concepciones, Tensiones y Elecciones. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social, pp. 19–46.
8.
Casero-RipollésALópez-RabadánP (2014) Media engagement boundaries and political influence in Europe. American Behavioral Scientist58(7): 859–868.
9.
Casero-RipollesAGarcía-SantamaríaJ VFernández-BeaumontJ (2015) The politicisation of journalism in Spain: Three obstacles to the professional autonomy of journalists. Anàlisi53: 95–109.
10.
Casero-RipollésAFeenstraRATormeyS (2016) Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of Podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics21(3): 378–397.
11.
Casero-RipollésAIzquierdo-CastilloJDoménech-FabregatH (2014) From watchdog to watched dog: Oversight and pressures between journalists and politicians in the context of mediatization. Trípodos34: 23–40.
12.
CookTE (2005) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution, 2nd ed.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DavisA (2007) Investigating journalist influences on political issue agendas at Westminster. Political Communication24(2): 181–199.
14.
Delli CarpiniMX (1994) Critical symbiosis: Three themes in president-press relations. Media Studies Journal8(2): 185–197.
15.
EsserFStrömbäckJDe VreeseC (2012) Reviewing key concepts in research on political news journalism. Journalism13(2): 139–143.
16.
GansHJ (1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
17.
GansHJ (2003) Democracy and the News. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HanitzschTMelladoC (2011) What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in eighteen countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 404–426.
20.
LangGELangK (1981) Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. Mass Communication Review Yearbook2: 447–468.
21.
LarssonL (2002) Journalists and politicians: A relationship requiring manoeuvring space. Journalism Studies3(1): 21–33.
22.
McCombsMHolbertRLKiousisS. (2011) The News and Public Opinion: Media Effects on Civic Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
ManciniP (1993) Between trust and suspicion: How political journalists solve the dilemma. European Journal of Communication8(1): 33–51.
24.
MaurerPPfetschB (2014) News coverage of politics and conflict levels: A cross-national study of journalists’ and politicians’ perceptions of two elements of mediatization. Journalism Studies15(3): 339–355.
25.
MazzoleniGSchutzW (1999) Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy?Political Communication16(3): 247–261.
26.
MelladoC (2015) Professional roles in news content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies16(4): 596–614.
27.
NeveuE (2002) Four generations of political journalism. In: KuhnRNeveuE (eds) Political Journalism: New Challenges, New Practices. London: Routledge, pp. 22–43.
28.
NimmoDD (1964) Newsgathering in Washington: A Study in Political Communication. New York: Atherton Press.
29.
RosenstielT (1993) Strange Bedfellows: How Television and the Presidential Candidates Changed American Politics 1992. New York: Hyperion Books.
30.
SampedroVSeoaneF (2008) The 2008 Spanish general elections: ‘antagonistic bipolarization’ geared by presidential debates, partisanship, and media interests. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 336–344.
31.
SellersP (2010) Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the US Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
StrömbäckJEsserF (2014) Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In: EsserFStrömbäckJ (eds) Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–28.
33.
StrömbäckJVan AelstP (2013) Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette75(4): 341–358.
34.
TedescoJC (2011) Political public relations and agenda building. In: StrömbäckJKiousisS (eds) Political Public Relations: Principles and Applications. London: Routledge, pp. 75–94.
35.
Van AelstPAalbergT (2011) Between trust and suspicion. A comparative study of the relationship between politicians and political journalists in Belgium, Norway and Sweden. Javnost – The Public18(4): 73–88.
36.
Van AelstPBrantsKLKVan PraagP. (2008) The fourth estate as superpower? An empirical study of perceptions of media power in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journalism Studies9(4): 494–511.
37.
Van DalenA (2012) The people behind the political headlines: A comparison of political journalists in Denmark, Germany, the United Kingdom and Spain. International Communication Gazette74(5): 464–483.
38.
Van DalenAAlbækEDe VreeseC (2011) Suspicious minds: Explaining political cynicism among political journalists in Europe. European Journal of Communication26(2): 147–162.
39.
Van DalenADe VreeseCAlbækE (2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism13(7): 903–922.
40.
WalgraveS (2008) Again, the almighty mass media? The media’s political agenda-setting power according to politicians and journalists in Belgium. Political Communication25(4): 445–459.
41.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media & Politics. New York: Routledge.
