This article contributes to a more systematic understanding of the role of newspaper ownership in deliberative processes by analyzing how inclusive local newspapers are of diverse perspectives on the Terri Schiavo case. Drawing on a content analysis of 1182 stories, we use multinomial logistic regression to analyze how ownership affects what ideas are included in the discussion as well as the tone with which they are discussed. We find that ownership indeed matters. Independently owned newspapers cover controversial ideas more often – even on the opinion pages. We also find that geography matters. Newspapers closest to the event epicenter include more stories and a broader range of perspectives regarding the Schiavo case. We discuss the implications of this research for understanding the role of economics in deliberative processes.
BagdikianBH (2004) The New Media Monopoly, 7th edn.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
2.
BakerCE (2002) Media, Markets, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BakerCE (2006) Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BensonR (1999) Field theory in comparative context: A new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society28: 463–498.
5.
BensonR (2006) News media as a ‘journalistic field’: What Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication23(2): 187–202.
6.
BensonR (2009) What makes news more multiperspectival? A field analysis. Poetics37(5): 402–418.
7.
BensonR (2013) Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonRHallinD (2007) How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US national press, 1965–97. European Journal of Communication22(1): 27–48.
9.
BensonRNeveuE (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10.
BerryWDFordingRCRingquistEJet al. (2010) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the U.S. states: A re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly10(2): 117–135.
11.
BerryWDRingquistEJFordingRCet al. (1998) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science42(1): 327–348.
12.
BettigRVHallJL (2012) Big Media, Big Money: Cultural Texts and Political Economics, 2nd edn.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television (trans. PP Ferguson). New York: New Press.
CiofaloATraversoK (1994) Does the op-ed page have a chance to become a public forum?Newspaper Research Journal15(4): 51–63.
16.
ClaymanSReisnerA (1998) Gatekeeping in action: Editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthiness. American Sociological Review63: 178–199.
17.
CranbergGBezansonRSoloskiJ (2001) Taking Stock: Journalism and the Publicly Traded Newspaper Company. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
18.
DahlbergL (2005) The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously?Theory and Society34: 111–136.
19.
DayAGGolanG (2005) Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Journalism Studies6(1): 61–71.
20.
FerreeMGamsonWGerhardsJet al. (2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GamsonWStuartD (1992) Media discourse as a symbolic contest: The bomb in political cartoons. Sociological Forum7(1): 55–86.
22.
GansH (1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
23.
GansH (2003) Democracy and the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
GartnerSS (2004) Making the international local: The terrorist attack on the USS Cole, local casualties, and media coverage. Political Communication21(2): 139–159.
25.
GitlinT (1980) The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
26.
GolanGWantaW (2004) Guest columns add diversity to NY Times’ op-ed Pages. Newspaper Research Journal25(2): 70–82.
27.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms (trans. RehgW). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
HardtH (2001) Social Theories of the Press: Constituents of Communication Research, 1840s to 1920s. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
HoffmannJP (2004) Generalized Linear Models: An Applied Approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
30.
HollifieldCAKosickiGMBeckerLB (2001) Organizational vs. professional culture in the newsroom: Television news directors’ and newspaper editors’ hiring decisions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media45(1): 92–117.
31.
JacobsRTownsleyE (2011) The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
KanissP (1997) Making Local News. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
McChesneyRW (2004) The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
34.
MedoffM (1997) The political implications of state political ideology: A measure tested. American Journal of Economics and Sociology56(2): 145–158.
PicardRGVan WeezelA (2008) Capital and control: Consequences of different forms of newspaper ownership. International Journal on Media Management10(1): 22–31.
38.
PortoM (2007) Frame diversity and citizen competence: Towards a critical approach to news quality. Critical Studies in Media Communication24(4): 303–321.
39.
RohJBerryFS (2008) Modeling the outcomes of state abortion funding referenda: Morality or redistributive policy, or both?State Politics & Policy Quarterly8(1): 66–87.
40.
RohlingerD (2007) American media and deliberative democratic processes. Sociological Theory25(2): 122–148.
41.
RohlingerDPedersonJValleG (2015) Inclusive discourse? Local media coverage of the Terri Schiavo case.Sociological Spectrum35(1): 1–25.
42.
RohlingerDAVaccaroCNaiman-SessionsMMauneyH (2015) Individual claims-making in the Terri Schiavo case. Social Currents2(4): 361–376.
43.
RosenfeldSS (2000) The op-ed page: A step to a better democracy. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5(3): 7–11.
44.
WesslerH (2008) Investigating deliberativeness comparatively. Political Communication25(1): 1–25.
45.
YoungIM (1997) Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
