In the changing news environment, young adult audiences, often dubbed ‘the Internet generation’, have increasingly gravitated toward online sources of news and information, raising questions about the nature and amount of news consumed. This study joins many others in looking at the emerging processes of news consumption among, in this case, college students, using focus group interviews to further examine how they go about obtaining news. Drawing upon literature in the areas of news consumption, media habits, generational change and news repertoire, this study identifies an emerging three-stage process of consumption that includes the following: routine surveillance, incidental consumption, and directed consumption, each conditioned by various forms of new media use. It suggests continued research in the interaction of a changing media ecology with generational adoption of news habits and the implications of this interaction for news and news engagement.
BakkerTBDe VreeseCH (2011) Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation. Communication Research38(4): 451–470.
5.
Chan-OlmstedSRimHZerbaA (2013) Mobile news adoption among young adults: Examining the roles of perceptions, news consumption, and media usage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(1): 126–147.
6.
DiddiALaRoseR (2006) Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 193–210.
7.
FeldmanL (2007) The news about comedy: Young audiences, The Daily Show, and evolving notions of journalism. Journalism8(4): 406–427.
8.
FergusonDAPerseEM (2000) The world wide web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media44(2): 155–174.
9.
HasebrinkUPoppJ (2006) Media repertoires as a result of selective media use: A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications31(3): 369-387.
10.
HeeterC (1985) Program selection with abundance of choice: A process model. Human Communication Research12(1): 126–152.
11.
KimYChenH-TGil De ZúñigaH (2013) Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2607–2614.
KohutADohertyCDimockMet al. (2011) More young people cite internet than TV: Internet gains on television as public’s main news source. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, January 4. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/689.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013).
14.
LaRoseR (2010) The problem of media habits. Communication Theory20: 194–222.
15.
LasswellHD (1948) The structure and function of communication in society. In: BrysonL (ed) The Communication of Ideas: A Series of Addresses. New York: Cooper Square Publishers, pp. 32-35.
16.
LeeAM (2013) News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumptions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(3): 300–317.
17.
LindloffTRTaylorBC (2011) Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
LuntPLivingstoneS (1996) Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication46(2): 79–98.
19.
MannheimK (1952) The problem of generations. In: MannheimKKecskemetiP (eds) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 276–322.
20.
MindichDTZ (2005) Tuned Out: Why Americans under 40 Don’t Follow the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
MitchelsteinEBoczkowskiPJ (2010) Online news consumption research: An assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New Media & Society12(7): 1085-1102.
RubinAMPerseEM (1987) Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research14(1): 58–84.
29.
Schmitz WeissA (2013) Exploring news apps and location-based services on the smartphone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(3): 435–456.
30.
SouthwellBGBlakeSHTorresA (2005) Lessons on focus group methodology from a science television news project. Communication52(2): 187–193.
31.
SundarSS (2008) The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: MetzgerMJFlanaginAJ (eds) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 72–100.
32.
TanejaHWebsterJMalthouseEet al. (2012) Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society14(6): 951–968.
33.
TapscottD (1998) Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
34.
TewksburyD (2003) What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the internet. Journal of Communication53(4): 569–748.
35.
TewksburyDWeaverAJMaddexBD (2001) Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(3): 533–554.
36.
WestlundO (2013) Mobile news: A review and model of journalism in an age of mobile media. Digital Journalism1(1): 6–26.
37.
WestlundOWeibullL (2013) Generation, life course and news media use in Sweden, 1986-2011. Northern Lights11: 147–173.
38.
YadamsurenBErdelezS (2010) Incidental exposure to online news. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology47(1): 1–8.
39.
YuanE (2011) News consumption across multiple media platforms. Information, Communication & Society14(7): 998–1016.
40.
ZerbaA (2011) Young adults’ reasons behind avoidances of daily print newspapers and their ideas for change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88(3): 597–614.
