This article contributes to recent discussions on the relationship between journalism and democracy. It presents empirical data on how corporate Nordic media executives perceive the state of journalism in their organizations. It shows how these executives assess the changing media logic and its effect on the journalistic agency of the institutions. The journalistic culture of the media institutions is related to the Habermasian view of democracy. The findings suggest that the colonization of the public sphere has increased and that market imperatives are forcing the media executives into a position where the legitimacy of their journalistic agency is compromised. There is an incongruity between some of the executives’ views and the general conception of journalism as a prime tool for democratic communication. The de-coupling of journalism and democracy could be seen as bi-directional. In addition to journalism not needing democracy to function, it becomes relevant to ask whether democracy could in fact function without the current type of Nordic news-journalism.
AndersenRStrateL (2000) Critical Studies in Media Commercialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnderssonUWiikJ (2013) Journalism meets management: Changing leadership in Swedish news organizations. Journalism Practice7(6): 705–719.
3.
BennettWL (2011) News: The Politics of Illusion, 9th edn.New York: Pearson.
4.
BennettWLEntmanRM (2001) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlumlerJGurevitchM (2002) The Crisis of Public Communication. New York: Taylor & Francis.
6.
CarpiniMXDCookFLJacobsLR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science7(1): 315–344.
7.
ChristiansCGGlasserTL (2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
8.
ClaymanSE (2002) Tribune of the people: Maintaining the legitimacy of aggressive journalism. Media, Culture & Society24(2): 197–216.
9.
CottleS (2013) Book review: David H Weaver and Lars Willnat (eds)The Global Journalist in the 21st Century. Journalism14(5): 696–700.
10.
DahlgrenP (2009) Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DahlgrenP (2010) Young Citizens and New Media. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
12.
DahlgrenPAlvaresC (2013) Political participation in an age of mediatisation. Javnost – The Public20(2): 47–66.
13.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
14.
DowneyJFentonN (2003) New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society5(2): 185–202.
15.
DoyleG (2006) The Economics of the Mass Media. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
16.
DryzekJS (2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
EsserFStrombackJde VreeseCH (2012) Reviewing key concepts in research on political news journalism: Conceptualizations, operationalizations, and propositions for future research. Journalism13(2): 139–143.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text25/26: 56–80.
20.
GeorgeC (2013) Diversity around a democratic core: The universal and the particular in journalism. Journalism14(4): 490–503.
21.
GuttmanN (2007) Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get ‘ordinary citizens’ to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory17(4): 411–438.
22.
HabermasJ (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
23.
HabermasJ (2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory16(4): 411–426.
24.
HabermasJRehgW (1998) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25.
HallinDC (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HanitzschT (2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory17(4): 367–385.
27.
HanitzschTMelladoC (2011) What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in eighteen countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 404–426.
28.
JosephiB (2013) De-coupling journalism and democracy: Or how much democracy does journalism need?Journalism14(4): 441–445.
29.
KantolaA (2013) From gardeners to revolutionaries: The rise of the liquid ethos in political. Journalism14(5): 606–626.
30.
KellnerD (2004) The media and the crisis of democracy in the age of Bush-2. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies1(1): 29–58.
31.
KovachBRosenstielT (2001) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect, 1st edn. New York: Crown.
32.
LivingstoneSLuntPMillerL (2007) Citizens, consumers and the citizen–consumer: Articulating the citizen interest in media and communications regulation. Discourse & Communication1(1): 63–89.
33.
LuntPLivingstoneS (2013) Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture & Society35(1): 87–96.
34.
McChesneyRW (2000) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. New York: New Press.
35.
NeroneJ (2013) The historical roots of the normative model of journalism. Journalism14: 446–458.
36.
PattersonTE (1997) The news media: An effective political actor?Political Communication14(4): 445–455.
37.
ReichZHanitzschT (2013) Determinants of journalists’ professional autonomy: Individual and national level factors matter more than organizational ones. Mass Communication and Society16(1): 133–156.
38.
RussoTC (1998) Organizational and professional identification: A case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly12(1): 72–111.
39.
SchudsonM (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism2(2): 149–170.
40.
SkovsgaardM (2014) Watchdogs on a leash? The impact of organisational constraints on journalists’ perceived professional autonomy and their relationship with superiors. Journalism15(3): 344–363.
41.
SkovsgaardMAlbækEBroP. (2013) A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism14(1): 22–42.
42.
SpyridouL-PMatsiolaMVeglisA. (2013) Journalism in a state of flux: Journalists as agents of technology innovation and emerging news practices. International Communication Gazette75(1): 76–98.
43.
StraubhaarJLaRoseRDavenportL (2013) Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology, 8th edn.Belmont, CA; Andover: Cengage Learning.
44.
ZelizerB (2004) When facts, truth, and reality are God-terms: On journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies1(1): 100–119.
45.
ZelizerB (2013) On the shelf life of democracy in journalism scholarship. Journalism14(4): 459–473.
