This article examines the dynamic relationship between issues in environmental news reporting. The focus of the study is on issue interactions within a single news programme over a 50-year period, covering all news stories on environmental issues in the main public service news programme on Swedish television between 1961 and 2010. The analysis shows a positive correlation between levels of attention to different environmental issues; intense focus on one category of environmental issues does not crowd out other environmental concerns in the news. On the contrary, a surge in interest to one category of environmental problems generates attention to other environmental issues as well.
BaumgartnerFRJonesBD (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BoykoffMTBoykoffJM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum38: 1190–1204.
3.
BrookesSKJordanAGKimberRHRichardsonJJ (1976) The growth of the environment as a political issue in Britain. British Journal of Political Science6(2): 245–255.
4.
BrossardDShanahanJMcComasK (2004) Are issue cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society7(3): 359–377.
5.
CarvalhoABurgessJ (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis25(6): 1457–1469.
6.
CottleS (2009) Global crises in the news: Staging new wars, disasters, and climate change. International Journal of Communication3: 494–516.
7.
Djerf-PierreM (2012a) The crowding-out effect: Issue dynamics and attention to environmental issues in television news reporting over 30 years. Journalism Studies. Epub 20January2012.
8.
Djerf-PierreM (2012b) Green metacycles of attention: Reassessing the attention cycles of environmental news reporting 1961–2010. Public Understanding of Science. Epub 10January2012.
9.
DryzekJS (1997) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
EinsiedelECoughlanE (1993) The Canadian press and the environment: Reconstructing a social reality. In: HansenA (ed.) Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 134–149.
11.
HansenA (2010) Environment, Media and Communication. London: Routledge.
12.
HilgartnerSBoskCL (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. The American Journal of Sociology94(1): 53–78.
13.
KepplingerHMHabermeierJ (1995) The impact of key events on the representation of reality. European Journal of Communication10(3): 271–390.
14.
LesterL (2010) Media and Environment. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
McGaurrLLesterL (2009) Complementary problems, competing risks: Climate change, nuclear energy, and the Australian. In: BoyceTLewisJ (eds) Climate Change and the Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 174–185.
16.
MazurA (1998) Global environmental change in the news. 1987–90 vs. 1992–96. International Sociology13(4): 457–472.
17.
NisbetMC (2010) Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In: D’AngeloPKuypersJA (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 43–83.
18.
NisbetMCHugeM (2006) Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. Press/Politics11(2): 3–40.
19.
ReeseSD (2001) Prologue – framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In: ReeseSDGandyOHJrGrantAE (eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 7–32.
20.
SchoenfeldACMeierRFGriffinRJ (1979) Constructing a social problem: The press and the environment. Social Problems27(1): 38–61.
21.
TrumboC (1996) Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science5(3): 269–283.
22.
UngarS (1998) Bringing the issue back in: Comparing the marketability of the ozone hole and global warming. Social Problems45(4): 510–527.
23.
WienCElmelund-PræstekærC (2009) An anatomy of media hypes: Developing a model for the dynamics and structure of intense media coverage of single issues. European Journal of Communication24(2): 183–201.
24.
VastermanPLM (2005) Media-hype: Self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards and the construction of social problems. European Journal of Communication20(4): 508–530.
