This study explores the boundary work of the Korean independent newsroom Newstapa. Newstapa creates its own logic of journalism, which is a combination of the core of professional journalism and of participatory journalism. Newstapa journalists, who previously worked in mainstream media, open the boundaries of professional work by embracing the nascent norms and practices of participatory culture. The use of digital media helps provide greater transparency to citizens. Newstapa defines truth-telling as a conversational process through which journalists work with citizens. Although this process causes journalists to relinquish their professional autonomy to citizens, it leads to a reconstruction of the professional exclusivity of being more accountable journalists who serve only citizens through truth-telling and are free from any other external forces. Newstapa’s logic also helps create a normative border separating Newstapa from other journalists. By adapting this logic, Newstapa challenges the social authority of mainstream media.
FreidsonE (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
FriedlandRAlfordRR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–263.
15.
FürsichE (2009) In defense of textual analysis. Journalism Studies10(2): 238–252.
16.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
17.
GlasserTL (1999) The Idea of Public Journalism. New York: Guilford Press.
18.
HellmuellerLVosTPPoepselMA (2013) Shifting journalistic capital? Transparency and objectivity in the twenty-first century. Journalism Studies14(3): 287–304.
19.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
20.
KarlssonM (2010) Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies11(4): 535–545.
LasicaJD (2005) The cost of ethics: Influence peddling in the blogosphere. Online Journalism Review, 17February. Available at: http://www.ojr.org/050217lasica
27.
LasorsaDLLewisSCHoltonAE (2012) Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies13(1): 19–36.
LewisSC (2012a) From journalism to information: The transformation of the Knight Foundation and news innovation. Mass Communication and Society15: 309–334.
31.
LewisSC (2012b) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
32.
LowreyW (2006) Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship. Journalism7(4): 477–500.
33.
LowreyW (2009) Institutional roadblocks: Assessing journalism’s response to changing audiences. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) Journalism and Citizenship: New Agendas in Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 44–67.
RobinsonS (2010) Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist–audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence16(1): 125–143.
41.
RobinsonS (2011) Journalism as process: The labor implications of participatory content in news organizations. Journalism & Communication Monographs13(3): 138–210.
42.
RobinsonSDeShanoC (2011) ‘Anyone can know’: Citizen journalism and the interpretive community of the mainstream press. Journalism12(8): 963–982.
43.
RosenJ (2008) Afterword: The people formerly known as the audience. In: CarpentierNDe CleenB (eds) Participation and Media Production: Critical Reflections on Content Creation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 163–165.
44.
RussellA (2011) Networked: A Contemporary History of News in Transition. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
45.
Sarfatti LarsonM (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46.
SchudsonMAndersonC (2008) Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 88–101.
47.
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.
48.
SiebertFSPetersonTSchrammW (1956) Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
49.
SingerJB (2005) The political j-blogger: ‘Normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism6(2): 173–198.
50.
SingerJB (2007) Contested autonomy: Professional and popular claims on journalistic norms. Journalism Studies8(1): 79–95.
51.
SingerJB (2008) The journalist in the network: A shifting rationale for the gatekeeping role and the objectivity norm. Tripodos23: 61–76.
52.
SteinbergDIShinM (2006) Tensions in South Korean political parties in transition: From entourage to ideology?Asian Survey46(4): 517–537.
53.
ZelizerB (1992) Covering the Body: The Kennedy Assassination, the Media, and the Shaping of Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
