This study, based on a content analysis of television news and survey in eleven nations, explores the split between those who see the media as politically alienating and others who see the media as encouraging greater political involvement. Here, we suggest that both positions are partly right. On the one hand, television news, and in particular public service television news, can be very effective in imparting information about public affairs and promoting a culture of democracy in which news exposure, public affairs knowledge, sense of democratic competence and political interest feed off each other. On the other hand, the views represented in public affairs news are overwhelmingly those of men and elites, which can discourage identification with public life.
AalbergTAelstPCurranJ (2010) Media system and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Press/Politics15(3): 255–271.
2.
AalbergTCurranJ (eds) (2102) How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. New York: Routledge.
3.
AalbergTPapathanassopoulosSSorokaS. (2013) International TV news, foreign affairs interest and public knowledge: A comparative study of foreign news coverage and public opinion in 11 countries. Journalism Studies14 (3): 387–406.
4.
AartsKSemetkoH (2003) The divided electorate: Media use and political involvement. Journal of Politics65: 759–784.
5.
AartsKFladmoreAStrombackJ (2012) Media, political trust, and political knowledge: A comparative perspective. In: AalbergTCurranJ (eds) How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. New York: Routledge.
6.
AnsolabehereSIyengarS (1995) Going Negative. New York: Free Press.
7.
AveryJ (2009) Videomalaise or virtuous circle? The influence of the news media on political trust. The International Journal of Press/Politics14: 410–433.
8.
BaumanZ (2001) The Individualised Society. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BennulfMHedbergP (1999) Utanför demokratin. Om det minskade valdeltagandets sociala och politiska rötter. Valdeltagande i förändring, pp. 75–135.
10.
BoulianneS (2011) Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication28(2): 147–162.
11.
BurnsNSchlozmanKVerbaS (2001) The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
CapellaJJamiesonK (1997) Spiral of Cynicism. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChaffeeSFrankS (1996) How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546(1): 48–58.
14.
CohenJBrancaccioDDatesJ. (2001) Symposium: journalism and mass communication education at the crossroads. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator56(3): 4–27.
15.
CouldryNLivingstoneSMarkhamT (2007) Media Consumption and Public Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
CudeckR (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin105: 317–327.
17.
CurranJ (2002) Media and Power. London: Routledge.
18.
CurranJ (2011) Media and Democracy. London: Routledge
19.
CurranJCoenSAalbergT. (2012). News content, media use and current affairs knowledge. In: AalbergTCurranJ (eds) How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. New York: Routledge.
20.
CurranJCoenSAalbergT. (2013) The internet revolution revisited: A comparative study of online news. Media, Culture and Society35(7): 880–897.
21.
CurranJIyengarSLundA. (2009) Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication24(1): 5–26.
22.
CushionS (2012). The Democratic Value of News: Why Public Service Media Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
DaltonRScarrowSCainB (2004) Advanced democracies and the new politics. Journal of Democracy15(1): 124–38.
24.
De VreeseCBoomgaardenH (2006) News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica41: 317–341.
25.
De VreeseCSemetkoH (2002) Cynical and engaged: Strategic campaign coverage, public opinion, and mobilization in a referendum. Communication Research29(6): 615–641.
26.
Delli CarpiniMKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
DrewDWeaverD (2006) Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter?Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83(1): 25–42.
28.
EvelandW (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79(1): 26–40.
29.
EvelandWScheufeleD (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication17: 215–237.
30.
FranklinM (2005) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
GrayMCaulM (2000) Declining voter turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950 to 1997: The effects of declining group mobilization. Comparative Political Studies33(9): 1091–112.
32.
HayC (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
HayashiK. (2013) Gender matters globally: An examination of gaps in political knowledge in a 10-nation comparative study. Article submitted to a journal.
34.
HoffmanLThomsonT (2009). The effect of television viewing on adolescents’ civic participation: Political efficacy as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media53(1): 3–21.
35.
HolmbergSOscarssonH (2004). Väljare – Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år (Voters - Swedish voting behaviour under 50 years). Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
36.
Holtz-BachaCNorrisP (2001) To entertain, inform, and educate: Still the role of public television. Political Communication18: 123–140.
37.
IyengarS. (2010) Cross-national versus individual-level differences in political information: A media systems perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties20: 291–309.
38.
IyengarS. (2013) The prevalence and correlates of out-party animosity: Cross-national evidence on affective polarization. Article submitted to a journal.
39.
JungNKimYde ZúñigaHG (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society14(4), 407–430.
40.
JunnJ (1991). Participation and political knowledge. In: CrottyW (ed.) Political Participation and American Democracy, pp. 193–212.
41.
KenskiKStroudN (2006) Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media50(2): 173–192.
42.
LloydJ (2004) What the Media are Doing to Our Politics. London: Constable.
43.
LupiaAPhilpotT (2005) Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest. Journal of Politics67(4): 1122–1142.
44.
McLeodJScheufeleDMoyP (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication16(3): 315–336.
45.
NorrisP (2000) A Virtuous Circle? Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Ofcom (2007) New News, Future News. London: Office of Communications.
47.
OskarsonM (2007) Social risk, policy dissatisfaction, and political alienation: A comparison of six European countries. In: SvallforsS (ed.) The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 117–148.
48.
PapathanassopoulosS. (2013) Online threat, but television is still dominant: A comparative study of 11 nations. Journalism Practice7(6): 690–704.
49.
PattersonT (2003) The Vanishing Voter. New York: Vintage.
50.
PedersenRT (2012). The game frame and political efficacy: Beyond the spiral of cynicism. European Journal of Communication27(3): 225–240.
51.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
52.
RobinsonM (1975) American political legitimacy in an era of electronic journalism: Reflections on the evening news. In CaterDAdlerR (eds) Television as a Social Force. New York: Praeger.
53.
RossKCarterC (2011) Women and news: A long and winding road. Media, Culture and Society33(8): 1148–1165.
54.
SchudsonM (1997) The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55.
SchudsonM (2003) Sociology of News. New York: Norton.
56.
SoltF (2008) Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science52(1): 48–60.
57.
SorokaSAndrewBAalbergT. (2013). Auntie knows best? Public broadcasters and current affairs knowledge. British Journal of Political Science43(4): 719–739.
58.
StrömbäckJShehataA (2010) Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research49: 575–597.
59.
TiffenRJonesPKRoweD. (2013) Sources in the news: A comparative study. Journalism Studies. Epub ahead of print 12September2013. DOI 10.1080/1461670X.2013.831239.
60.
ValentinoNGregorowiczKGroenendykE (2009) Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior31(3): 307–330.
61.
VavreckLIyengarS (2011) The future of political communication research: Online panels and experimentation. In: ShapiroRJacobsL (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
VerbaSBurnsNSchlozmanK (1997) Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics59: 1051–1072.
63.
WolbrechtCCampbellD (2007) Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science54(4): 921–939.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
