In the US, a dominant narrative about news and democracy claims that democracy depends on a knowledgeable citizenry and that knowledge stems from news consumption. News and politics are said to positively correlate; the political democracy’s vibrancy depends upon the strength of both. This qualitative examination of ‘news resisters,’ people who purposefully limit their news consumption, turns the news-democracy narrative on its head by arguing that decreased news consumption positions resisters to participate in public life. Informed by practice theory, evidence about news resistance sheds light on the specific ways news resisters relate to news and on the social norms around news consumption against which they conceptualize and forge their own practices. News resisters articulate the benefits of limited news consumption – greater calm and purpose, a constructive attitude toward the present and future, a willingness to work with others – qualities that enable news resisters to engage in meaningful political participation.
BauerM (1995) Resistance to new technology and its effects on nuclear power, information technology and biotechnology. In: BauerM (ed.) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–41.
2.
BirdSE (1990) Storytelling on the far side: Journalism and the weekly tabloid. Critical Studies in Mass Communication7(4): 377–389.
3.
BirdSE (2003) The Audience in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
4.
BrintonHH (2002) Friends for 350 Years. Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill Publications.
5.
CalhounC (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
CareyJ (1999) In defense of public journalism. In: GlasserTL (ed.) The Idea of Public Journalism. New York: Guilford, pp.49–66.
7.
CareyJ (2001) Where journalism went wrong. Journalism2(3): 251–254.
8.
ChaffeeSHSchleuderJ (1986) Measurement and effects of attention to news media. Human Communication Research13(1): 76–107.
9.
CouldryN (2004) Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics14(2): 115–132.
10.
CouldryN (2012) Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
DeanJ (2009) Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
EdelmanMBennettWLEntmanRM (2001) The Politics of Misinformation. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
14.
EvelandWPHayesAFShahDV. (2005) Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication22(4): 423–446.
15.
FallowsJ (1997) Breaking the News. New York: Vintage.
16.
FentonN (2010) Drowning or waving? New media, journalism, and democracy. In: FentonN (ed.) New Media, Old News: Journalism & Democracy in the Digital Age. London: Sage, pp.3–16.
17.
FischerPSchulz-HardtSFreyD (2008) Selective exposure and information quantity: How different information quantities moderate decision makers’ preference for consistent and inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(2): 231–244.
FriedlandLA (2001) Communication, community and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research28(4): 358–391.
20.
GansHJ (1979) Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon.
21.
GansHJ (2003) Democracy and the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
GitlinT (2007) Media Unlimited: How the Torrent of Images and Sounds Overwhelms our Lives. New York: Holt.
24.
JamiesonKHCappellaJN (2008) Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
JonesAS (2009) Losing the News: The Future of the News that Feeds Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
KatzELazarsfeldP (1955) Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
KatzELiebesT (1990) The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
KlineR (2003) Resisting consumer technology in rural America: The telephone and electrification. In: OudshoornNPinchT (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.51–66.
McQuailDGraberDNorrisP (1998) Conclusion: Challenges for public policy. In: GraberDMcQuailDNorrisP (eds) The Politics of News: The News of Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp.251–257.
37.
MindichD (1998) Just the Facts: How ‘Objectivity’ Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
38.
MindichDT (2005) Tuned Out: Why Americans Under 40 Don’t Follow the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
PhillipsACouldryNDesF (2010) An ethical deficit? Accountability, norms, and the material conditions of contemporary journalism. In: FentonN (ed.) New Media, Old News. London: Sage, pp.51–67.
44.
Portwood-StacerL (2012) Media refusal and conspicuous nonconsumption: The performative and political dimensions of facebook abstention. New Media & Society00: 1–17. Available at: nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/12/04/1461444812465139.abstract (accessed 16 January 2013).
45.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
RadwayJ (1984) Reading the Romance. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
RogersEM (2003) Diffusions of Innovations. 5th ed.New York: Free Press.
49.
ScheuerJ (2008) The Big Picture: Why Democracies Need Journalistic Excellence. New York: Routledge.
50.
SchudsonM (1995) The Power of News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
SchudsonM (1998) The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.
52.
SeiterE (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
ShahDVMcLeodJMYoonSH (2001) Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and internet influences. Communication Research28(4): 464–506.
WolcottH (1999). Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Lanham, Maryland: Altamira Press.
61.
WyattS (2005) Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the internet. In: OudshoornNPinchT (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.67–79.
62.
WyattSThomasGTerranovaT (2002) They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: Conceptualizing use and non-use of the internet. In: WoolgarS (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.23–40.
63.
YoungDGTisingerR (2006) Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. International Journal of Press/Politics11(3): 113–134.
