Environmental journalists have historically struggled between journalistic objectivity and environmental advocacy. But the roles they embrace are based not only on their individual conceptions but also on their perceptions of what their organizations expect from them. Thus, journalistic role conceptions are the melding of individual and organizational role conceptions. These roles do not always correspond, especially for environmental journalists who must compete for space and attention with more sensational and more accessible political, crime or entertainment stories that organizations in search for profit might prioritize. This study finds that such role inconsistencies exist and are influenced by both individual and organizational factors.
BeamRA (1990) Journalistic professionalism as an organizational-level concept. Journalism Monographs24: 1–43.
2.
BoykoffMTBoykoffJM (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change Part A14: 125–136.
3.
BrewerMB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86: 307–324.
4.
BrillAM (2001) Online journalists embrace new marketing function. Newspaper Research Journal22: 28–40.
5.
BrownR (2000) Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology30: 745–778.
6.
CassidyWP (2006) Gatekeeping similar for online, print journalists. Newspaper Research Journal27: 6–23.
7.
CharngH-WPiliavinJACalleroPL (1988) Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly51: 303–317.
8.
ChristiansCGlasserTMcQuailD. (2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
ComptonJRBenedettiP (2010) Labour, new media and the institutional restructuring of journalism. Journalism Studies11: 487–499.
10.
DetjenJFicoFLiX. (2000) Changing work environment of environmental reporters. Newspaper Research Journal21: 2–12.
11.
DonsbachW (2004) Psychology of news decisions: Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism5(2): 131–157.
12.
DonsbachW (2008) Journalists’ role perceptions. In: DonsbachW (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2605–2610.
13.
FahyDNisbetMC (2011) The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices. Journalism12(7): 778–793.
14.
FieldA (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
FilakVF (2004) Cultural convergence: Intergroup bias among journalists and its impact on convergence. Atlantic Journal of Communication12: 216–232.
16.
FranklinB (2008) The future of newspapers. Journalism Practice2: 306–317.
17.
GiannoulisCBotetzagiasISkanavisC (2010) Newspaper reporters’ priorities and beliefs about environmental journalism: An application of Q-methodology. Science Communication32: 425–466.
18.
HanitzschT (2011) Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators. International Communication Gazette73: 477–494.
19.
HanitzschTHanuschF (2012) Does gender determine journalists’ professional views? A reassessment based on cross-national evidence. European Journal of Communication27: 257–277.
20.
HansenA (1994) Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Understanding of Science3: 111–134.
21.
HayesASingerJCepposJ (2007) Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics22: 262–279.
22.
HoggMATerryDJWhiteKM (1995) A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly58: 255–269.
23.
JanowitzM (1975) Professional models in journalism: the gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly52: 618–662.
24.
JohnstoneJSlawskiEBowmanW (1976) The News People: A Sociological Portrait of American Journalists and their Work. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
McCluskeyM (2008) Reporter beat and content differences in environmental stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85: 83–98.
26.
McCluskeyMKimYM (2012) Moderatism or polarization? Representation of advocacy groups’ ideology in newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly89: 565–584.
27.
MertlerCVannattaR (2010) Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.
28.
MeyenMRiesmeyerC (2011) Service providers, sentinels, and traders. Journalism Studies13: 386–401.
29.
PalenJA (1999) Objectivity as independence. Science Communication21: 156–171.
30.
ReeseSDBallingerJ (2001) The roots of a sociology of news: Remembering Mr. Gates and social control in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78: 641–658.
31.
SachsmanDBSimonJValentiJM (2005) Wrestling with objectivity and fairness: U.S. environment reporters and the business community. Applied Environmental Education & Communication4: 363–373.
32.
SachsmanDBSimonJValentiJM (2010) Environment Reporters in the 21st Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
SchultzT (2002) Does education matter? Characteristics of journalists who went to graduate school. Journalism3(2): 223–238.
34.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
35.
ShoemakerPJVosTP (2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
36.
SigelmanL (1973) Reporting the news: An organizational analysis. American Journal of Sociology79: 132–151.
37.
SingerJB (2004) More than ink-stained wretches: The resocialization of print journalists in converged newsrooms. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81: 838–856.
38.
SkovsgaardMAlbækEBroP. (2013) A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism14(1): 22–42.
39.
StockingSHHolsteinLW (2009) Manufacturing doubt: Journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science18: 23–42.
40.
StraubhaarJLaRoseRDavenportL (2011) Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
SundbladE-LBielAGarlingT (2009) Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environment and Behavior41: 281–302.
42.
TajfelH (1974) Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information13(2): 65–93.
43.
TajfelHTurnerJ (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinW (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
44.
TandocEHellmuellerLVosTP (2012) Mind the gap: Between role conceptions and role enactments. Journalism Practice. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2012.726503
45.
ThoitsPA (1991) On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly54: 101–112.
46.
Van DalenADe VreeseCHAlbækE (2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism13(7): 903–922.
47.
WaisbordS (2000) Watchdog Journalism in South America. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
WaisbordS (2008) Advocacy journalism in a global context. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 371–385.
49.
WeaverDH (2009) Journalism research: Past trends and new directions. In: Holtz-BachaCReusGBeckerLB (eds) Wissenschaft mit Wirkung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 303–316.
50.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1986) The American Journalist. A Portrait of US News People and their Work. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
51.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1996) The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
WeaverDHBeamRABrownleeBJ. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century. U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
WilsonKM (2000) Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science9: 1–13.
