Twitter,YouTube,and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests

Abstract

This article examines the appropriation of social media as platforms of alternative journalism by the protestors of the 2010 G20 summit in Toronto, Canada. The Toronto Community Mobilization Network, the network that coordinated the protests, urged participants to broadcast news using Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr. This particular use of social media is studied in the light of the history and theory of alternative journalism. Analyzing a set of 11,556 tweets, 222 videos, and 3,338 photos, the article assesses user participation in social media protest reporting, as well as the resulting protest accounts. The findings suggest that social media did not facilitate the crowd-sourcing of alternative reporting, except to some extent for Twitter. As with many previous alternative journalistic efforts, reporting was dominated by a relatively small number of users. In turn, the resulting account itself had a strong event-oriented focus, mirroring often-criticized mainstream protest reporting practices.

Keywords

Activism alternative journalism Flickr G20 protests protest reporting social media Twitter user participation YouTube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2003) Environmental activism and the news media. In: Cottle

(ed.) News, Public Relations and Power. London: SAGE, pp.117–132.

Atton

(2002) Alternative Media. London: SAGE.

Atton

(2003) What is ‘alternative journalism’? Journalism 4(3): 267–272.

Atton

Hamilton

(2008) Alternative Journalism. London: SAGE.

Atton

Wickenden

(2005) Sourcing routines and representation in alternative journalism: A case study approach. Journalism Studies 6(3): 347–359.

Austen

(2010) Police in Toronto criticized for treatment of protesters, many peaceful. The New York Times, 27 June. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/world/americas/28security.html

Beck

Beck-Gernsheim

(2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE.

Becker

(1967) Whose side are we on? Social Problems 14: 239–247.

Bennett

(1988) News, the Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman.

10.

Bennett

(2004) Communicating global activism. Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. In: Donk

Loader

Nixon

Rucht

(eds) Cyberprotest. London: Routledge, pp. 123–146.

11.

Bennett

Segerberg

(2011) Digital media and the personalization of collective action. Information, Communication & Society 14(6): 770–799.

12.

Boyd

Golder

Lotan

(2010) Tweet tweet retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of HICSS-43, Kauai, Hawaii, 5–8 January.

13.

Bruns

(2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

14.

Castells

(1997) The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

15.

Castells

(2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

CBC News (2010) G20 protest violence prompts over 400 arrests. CBCNEWS, 27 June. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2010/06/26/g20-saturday-protests.html.

17.

Cha

Haddadi

Benevenuto

Gummadi

(2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 23–26 May.

18.

Chomsky

Herman

(1988) Manufacturing Consent. The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.

19.

Cohen

Young

(eds) (1981) The Manufacture of News – Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media. London: Constable.

20.

Cottle

(ed.) (2003) News, Public Relations and Power. London: SAGE.

21.

Cottle

(2008) Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture & Society 30(6): 853–872.

22.

Couldry

Curran

(eds) (2003) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media Power in a Networked World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

23.

Coyer

(2005) If it leads it bleeds: The participatory newsmaking of the Independent Media Center. In: De Jong

Shaw

Stammers

(eds) Global Activism, Global Media. London: Pluto Press, pp. 165–178.

24.

Deacon

Golding

(1994) Taxation and Representation. London: John Libbey.

25.

Dean

(2003) Why the net is not a public sphere. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 10(1): 95–112.

26.

Della Porta

(2005) Multiple belongings, flexible identities and the construction of ‘another politics’: Between the European social forum and the local social fora. In: Della Porta

Tarrow

(eds) Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 175–202.

27.

Downing

(ed.) (2001) Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

28.

Downing

(2003) The Indymedia phenomenon: Space-place-democracy and the new independent media centers. In: Lacroix

Tremblay

(eds) 2001 Bogues: Globalisme et Pluralisme, vol 2. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, pp. 57–67.

29.

Edwards

(2010) Canada flunks on indigenous rights, protesters say. thestar.com, 24 June. Available at: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/827924--canada-flunks-on-indigenous-rights-protesters-say?bn=1.

30.

Gaffney

(2010) #iranElection: Quantifying online activism. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10, Raleigh, NC, 26–27 April.

31.

Giddens

(1991) Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

32.

Gitlin

(1980) The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.

33.

Hackett

Carroll

(2006) Remaking Media. The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. New York: Routledge.

34.

Hall

. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law. London: Macmillan.

35.

Halloran

Elliott

Murdock

(1970) Demonstrations and Communication: A Case Study. London: Penguin.

36.

Hansen

(ed.) (1993) The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

37.

Harcup

(2003) The unspoken – said: The journalism of alternative media. Journalism 4(3): 356–376.

38.

Hermida

(2010) Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice 4(3): 297–308.

39.

Hwang

. (2009) The Iranian Election on Twitter: The First Eighteen Days. Web Ecology Project. Available at: http://www.webecologyproject.org/2009/06/iran-election-on-twitter/

40.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University.

41.

Jordan

(2010) Gay rights protest hits Toronto ahead of G20. Reuters, 22 June. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/06/22/g20-protest-idUSN2216509620100622

42.

Kidd

(2003) Indymedia.org: A new communication commons. In: McCaughey

Ayers

(eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp.47–69.

43.

Lotan

. (2011) The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication 5: 1375–1405.

44.

Lovink

Niederer

(2008) Video Vortex Reader: Responses to YouTube. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

45.

Manning

(2001) News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE.

46.

Murdock

(1981) Political deviance: The press presentation of a militant mass demonstration. In: Young

Cohen

(eds) The Manufacture of News – Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media. London: Constable, pp.206–225.

47.

Platon

Deuze

(2003) Indymedia journalism. A radical way of making, Selecting and sharing news? Journalism 4(3): 336–355.

48.

Rogers

(2009) The End of the Virtual – Digital Methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

49.

Rucht

(2004) The quadruple ‘A’: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In: Donk

Loader

Nixon

Rucht

(eds) Cyberprotest. London: Routledge, pp. 29–56.

50.

Sassen

(2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

51.

Schlesinger

(1990) Rethinking the sociology of journalism: Source strategies and the limits of media-centrism. In: Ferguson

(ed.) Political Communication: The New Imperative. London: SAGE, pp. 61–83.

52.

Shirky

(2003) Power laws, weblogs, and inequality. Clay Shirky’s Writings About the Internet, 10 February. Available at: http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html

53.

Shirky

(2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. London: Penguin.

54.

Stemler

(2001) An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(17). Available at: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17

55.

Tarleton

(2000) Protesters develop their own global internet news service. Nieman Reports 54(4): 53–56.

56.

TCMN (2010) About us. Available at: http://g20.torontomobilize.org/getinformed

57.

Van Dijck

(2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture & Society 31(1): 41–58.

58.

Wright

(2004) Informing, communicating and ICTs in contemporary anti-capitalist movements. In: Donk

Loader

Nixon

Rucht

(eds) Cyberprotest. London: Routledge, pp. 69–83.

59.

Zuckerman

(2011) The first Twitter revolution? Foreign Policy, 14 January. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/14/the_first_twitter_revolution