This article explored the use of social media and mobile communication by women in Saudi Arabia who campaigned for the right to drive from 1990. Due to the globally unique ban on women driving in the Kingdom, females always needed a male driver to transport them. The Saudi government announced in September 2017 that women would be allowed to drive from June 2018. Using the theory of connective action, the article explored the role of social media in the movement for the right to drive, and looked at how activists used digital media platforms to get their messages across to the Saudi publics and the international community. Findings showed that both connective action and collective action offer tactics that can complement each other in an online movement. In addition, results offer in-depth insights about the role of identity in online movements. Threats to and limitations of online movements are also discussed.
Al-KhateebS (1998) Women, family and the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia. Marriage and Family Review27(1–2): 167–189.
3.
Al-ManaAAl-ShaikhH (2013) Al-Sadiss min November . . . Al-Mara’ wa qiyadat al-sayara 1990 [The sixth of November . . . women and driving in 1990]. Beirut, Lebanon: Jadawel.
AzerEHarindranathGZhenY (2019) Revisiting leadership in information and communication technology (ICT)-enabled activism: a study of Egypt’s grassroots human rights groups. New Media & Society21(5): 1141–1169.
9.
BakardjievaM (2015) Do clouds have politics? Collective actors in social media land. Information, Communication & Society18(8): 983–990.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society15: 739–768.
12.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2013) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BimberB (2017) Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication34: 6–20.
BonillaYRosaJ (2015) #Ferguson: digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist42(1): 4–17.
Della RattaDValerianiA (2012) Remixing the spring! Connective leadership and read-write practices in the 2011 Arab uprisings. CyberOrient: Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East6(1). Available at: http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=7763
23.
DeLucaKLawsonSSunY (2012) Occupy wall street on the public screens of social media: the many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture, and Critique5(4): 483–509.
24.
DennisEMartinJDWoodR (2013) Media Use in the Middle East 2013: An Eight-Nation Survey. Doha, Qatar: Northwestern University in Qatar.
25.
DruekeRZoblE (2016) Online feminist protest against sexism: the German-language hashtag #Aufschrei. Feminist Media Studies16(1): 35–54.
26.
EltantawyNWiestJB (2011) Social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication5: 1207–1224.
27.
FarajSAzadB (2012) The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Techological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 237–258.
GowingN (2011) Time to move on: new media realities—new vulnerabilities of power. Media, War & Conflict4(1): 13–19.
31.
HalupkaM (2016) The rise of information activism: how to bridge dualisms and reconceptualise political participation. Information, Communication & Society19(10): 1487–1503.
HatakkaN (2017) When logics of party politics and online activism collide: the populist Finns Party’s identity under negotiation. New Media & Society19(12): 2022–2038.
34.
HopkinsNIbrahimS (eds) (1997) Arab Society: Class, Gender, Power, and Development. Cairo, Egypt; New York: The American University of Cairo Press.
JuaidK (2013) Uqubat al-massirat al-mahzoura tutabaqu ala kul imraa taqoud al-sayara [Penalties for banned demonstrations will apply to every woman that drives]. Aleqtisadiah, 25October. Available at: http://www.aleqt.com/2013/10/25/article_795156.html
KharroubTBasO (2016) Social media and protests: an examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society18(9): 1973–1992.
48.
KimJ (2018) Why do people talk to the streets? Understanding the multidimensional motivations of protesting publics. Public Relations Review44: 501–513.
KumarRThapaD (2015) Social media as a catalyst for civil society movements in India: a study in Dehradun city. New Media & Society17(8): 1299–1316.
52.
LazarTRibakRDavidsonR (2020) Mobile social media as platforms in workers’ unionization. Information, Communication & Society23(3): 437–453.
53.
Le RenardA (2008) “Only for Women”: women, the state, and reform in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Journal62(4): 610–629.
54.
LeeFLFChanJM (2016) Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: a study of the umbrella movement. Information, Communication & Society19(1): 4–22.
55.
LimM (2013) Framing Bouazizi: “White lies,” hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising. Journalism14(7): 921–941.
LotanGGraeffEAnannyM, et al. (2011) The revolutions were tweeted: information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication5: 1375–1405.
ParsloeSMHoltonAE (2018) #Boycottautismspeaks: communicating a counternarrative through cyberactivism and connective action. Information, Communication & Society21(8): 1116–1133.
PoellTAbdullaRRiederB, et al. (2016) Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society19(7): 994–1014.
70.
PondPLewisJ (2019) Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society22(2): 213–231.
71.
PostillJ (2013) Book review: the logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(4): 498–500.
SegerbergABennetWL (2011) Social media and the organization of collective action: using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review14(3): 197–215.
ToepflF (2018) From connective to collective action: internet elections as a digital tool to centralize and formalize protest in Russia. Information, Communication & Society21(4): 531–547.
79.
UldamJ (2018) Social media visibility: challenges to activism. Media, Culture & Society40(1): 41–58.
80.
VaastESafadiHLapointeL, et al. (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: an examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly41(4): 1179–1205.
