Using a National Geographic magazine story on Saudi Arabia as a case study, this article examines how pictures and text in a photo story interact to produce meaning for readers. Specifically, it investigates how participants’ perceptions of Saudi Arabia differed when they were exposed only to the text of the article, only to its photographs, or to both text and photographs, using focus group interviews. Participants exposed only to the text saw it as a cohesive narrative. The ‘photos only’ groups tended to jump between photographs without a linear pattern. The ‘text and photos’ groups perceived the photo story as composed of two competing narratives, which made them uncomfortable. In addition, readers exposed to the visual narrative — even when combined with the textual narrative — expressed more stereotypical views of the subjects than those exposed to the text only. The photographs appeared to detract from the text’s ability to generate a more complex understanding of Saudi culture.
Abramson, Howard S. ( 1987) National Geographic: Behind America’s Lens on the World. New York: Crown Publishers .
2.
Agee, James and Walker Evans ( 1960) Let Us Now Praise Famous Men. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Allen, William A. ( 2003) ‘From the Editor’, National Geographic Magazine204(4).
4.
Allner, Michel ( 2000) ‘Mainstreaming the World at the National Geographic Society: Para-educational Images and Cultural Commodities for the Family of Members’, Revue Française D’Etudes Américaines85: 60-70.
5.
Alloula, Malek ( 1986) The Colonial Harem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Barthes, Roland ( 1977) Image - Music - Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
7.
Block, Bernard ( 1984) ‘Romance and High Purpose: The National Geographic’ , Wilson Library Bulletin58(5): 333-7.
8.
Collins, Jane L. and Catherine A. Lutz ( 1992) ‘Becoming America’s Lens on the World: National Geographic in the Twentieth Century’, The South Atlantic Quarterly91(1): 161-91.
9.
David, Prabu ( 1998) ‘News Concreteness and Visual-verbal Association: Do News Pictures Narrow the Recall Gap between Concrete and Abstract News?’ , Human Communication Research25: 180-201.
10.
Drew, Dan G. and Thomas Grimes ( 1987) ‘Audio-visual Redundancy and TV News Recall’ , Communication Research14(4): 452-61.
11.
Fiske, John ( 1990) Introduction to Communication Studies. London: Routledge.
12.
Garcia, Mario R. and Peggie Stark ( 1991) Eyes on the News. St Petersburg, FL : Poynter Institute.
13.
Gentner, Dedre and Elizabeth F. Loftus ( 1979) ‘Integration of Verbal and Visual Information as Evidenced by Distortions in Picture Memory’, American Journal of Psychology92(2): 363-75.
14.
Graber, Doris A. ( 1985) ‘Approaches to Content Analysis of Television News Programs’, Communications11(2): 25-36.
15.
Graber, Doris A. ( 1990) ‘Seeing Is Remembering: How Visuals Contribute to Learning from Television News’, Journal of Communication40(3): 134-55.
16.
Grimes, Thomas ( 1990) ‘Encoding TV News Messages into Memory’, Journalism Quarterly67(4): 757-66.
17.
Grimes, Thomas and Robert Drechsel ( 1996) ‘Word-picture Juxtaposition, Schemata, and Defamation in Television News’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly73(1): 169-90.
18.
Hamilton, David L., Steven J. Sherman and Catherine M. Ruvolo ( 1990) ‘Stereotypebased Expectancies: Effects on Information Processing and Social Behavior’, Journal of Social Issues46(2): 35-60.
19.
Hicks, Wilson ( 1952) Words and Pictures. New York: Arno Press.
20.
Hill, Charles A. ( 2004) ‘The Psychology of Rhetorical Images’, in C. A. Hill and M. Helmers (eds) Defining Visual Rhetorics, pp. 25-40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Hunter, Jefferson ( 1987) Image and Word: The Interaction of Twentieth Century Photographs and Text. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hyndman, David ( 2002) ‘Indigenous Representation of the T’boli and the Tasaday Lost Tribe Controversy in Postcolonial Philippines: Interpreting the Eroticized, Effeminising Gaze in National Geographic’, Social Identities8(1): 45-66.
23.
Kalish, Stanley E. and Clifton C. Edom ( 1951) Picture Editing. New York: Rinehart.
24.
Koblinsky, Sally G., Donna F. Cruse and Alan I. Sugawara ( 1978) ‘Sex Role Stereotypes and Children’s Memory for Story Content’, Child Development49: 452-8.
Krueger, Richard A. and Mary Anne Casey ( 2000) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Lang, Annie ( 1995) ‘Defining Audio/Video Redundancy from a Limited-capacity Information Processing Perspective’, Communication Research22(1): 86-115.
28.
Lang, Annie, Robert F. Potter and Paul D. Bolls ( 1999) ‘Something for Nothing: Is Visual Encoding Automatic?’ , Media Psychology1(2): 145-64.
29.
Levie, W. Howard and Richard Lentz ( 1982) ‘Effect of Text Illustrations: A Review of Research’ , Education and Communication Technology Journal30: 195-232.
30.
Lutz, Catherine A. and Jane L. Collins ( 1993) Reading National Geographic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Magazine Publishers of America (2006) ‘Average Total Paid and Verified Circulation for Top 100 ABC Magazines’ , URL (consulted January 2008): http://www.magazine.org/Circulation/circulation_trends_and_magazine_handbook/22175.cfm
32.
Mendelson, Andrew L. ( 2001) ‘Effects of Novelty in News Photographs on Attention and Memory’, Media Psychology3: 119-57.
33.
Mendelson, Andrew L. and Esther L. Thorson ( 2003) ‘The Impact of News Stories and Photos on the Processing of Information about Hillary Rodham Clinton’, The New Jersey Journal of Communication11(2): 135-48.
34.
Messaris, Paul ( 1994) Visual Literacy: Image, Mind and Reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
Messaris, Paul ( 1997) Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
Mintzer, Miriam Z. and Joan G. Snodgrass ( 1999) ‘The Picture Superiority Effect: Support for the Distinctiveness Model’, American Journal of Psychology112(1): 115-46.
37.
Mitchell, W.J.T. ( 1994) Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Moors, Annelies ( 1996) ‘On Appearance and Disappearance: Representing Women in Palestine under theBritish Mandate’, Thamyris3(2): 279-310.
39.
Nelson, Douglas L. ( 1979) ‘Remembering Pictures and Words: Appearance, Significance, and Name’, in L. S. Cermak and F. I. M. Craik (eds) Levels of Processing in Human Memory, pp. 45-76. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Nelson, Douglas L., Valerie S. Reed and John R. Walling ( 1976) ‘Pictorial Superiority’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory2(5): 523-8.
41.
Neuhaus, Jessamyn ( 1997) ‘Colonizing the Coffee Table: National Geographic Magazine and Erasure of Difference in the Representation of Women’, American Periodicals7: 1-26.
42.
Neuman, W. Russell, Marion R. Just and Ann N. Crigler ( 1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Nichols, Bill ( 1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
44.
Nordstrom, Alison Devine ( 1992) ‘Wood Nymphs and Patriots: Depictions of Samoans in the National Geographic Magazine’, Visual Sociology7(2): 49-59.
45.
Owen, William ( 1992) Modern Magazine Design. New York: William C. Brown.
46.
Paivio, Allan ( 1971) Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
47.
Paivio, Allan and Kalman Csapo ( 1973) ‘Picture Superiority in Free Recall: Imagery or Dual Coding’, Cognitive Psychology5: 176-206.
48.
Parameswaran, Radhika ( 2002) ‘Local Culture in Global Media: Excavating Colonial and Material Discourses in National Geographic’, Communication Theory12(3): 287-315.
49.
Pauly, Philip J. ( 1979) ‘The World and All That Is In It: The National Geographic Society, 1888-1918’, American Quarterly31: 517-32.
50.
Pezdek, Kathy ( 1977) ‘Cross-modality Semantic Integration of Sentence and Picture Memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory3(5): 515-24.
51.
Poole, Robert M. ( 2004) Explorers House: National Geographic and the World it Made. New York: Penguin Press.
52.
Reese, Stephen D. ( 1984) ‘Visual-verbal Redundancy Effects on Television News Learning’, Journal of Broadcasting28(1): 79-87.
53.
Said, Edward W. ( 1987) Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. New York: Vintage Books.
54.
Schulten, Susan ( 2000) ‘The Making of the National Geographic: Science , Culture, and Expansionism’, American Studies41(1): 5-29.
55.
Signorella, Margaret L. ( 1992) ‘Remembering Gender-related Information’, Sex Roles27(3/4): 143-56.
56.
Silva, M.M., J.A. Groeger and M.F. Bradshaw ( 2006) ‘Attention-memory Interactions in Scene Perceptions’ , Spatial Vision19(1): 9-19.
57.
Stangor, Charles and Diane N. Ruble ( 1989) ‘Strength of Expectancies and Memory for Social Information: What We Remember Depends on How Much We Know’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology25: 18-35.
58.
Steet, Linda ( 2000) Veils and Daggers: A Century of National Geographic’s Representation of the Arab World. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
59.
Stone, Gerald ( 1987) Examining Newspapers: What Research Reveals about America’s Newspapers. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE .
60.
Trachtenberg, Alan ( 1989) Reading American Photographs: Images as History, Mathew Brady to Walker Evans. New York: Hill and Wang.
61.
Viviano, Frank ( 2003) ‘Kingdom on Edge: Saudi Arabia’, National Geographic Magazine204(4): 2-41.
62.
Wanta, Wayne and Virginia Roark ( 1994) ‘Responses to Photographs’, Visual Communication Quarterly1(2): 12-13.
63.
Wolf, Rita and Gerald L. Grotta ( 1985) ‘Images: A Question of Readership’, Newspaper Research Journal6: 30-6.
64.
Worth, Sol ( 1982) Studying Visual Communication. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
65.
Zillmann, Dolf, Rhonda Gibson and Stephanie L. Sargent ( 1999) ‘Effects of Photographs in News-magazine Reports on Issue Perception’, Media Psychology1: 207-28.
