Since its inception, the concept of `intersectionality' — the interaction of multiple identities and experiences of exclusion and subordination — has been heralded as one of the most important contributions to feminist scholarship. Despite its popularity, there has been considerable confusion concerning what the concept actually means and how it can or should be applied in feminist inquiry. In this article, I look at the phenomenon of intersectionality's spectacular success within contemporary feminist scholarship, as well as the uncertainties and confusion which it has generated. Drawing upon insights from the sociology of science, I shall show how and why intersectionality could become a feminist success story. I shall argue that, paradoxically, it is precisely the concept's alleged weaknesses — its ambiguity and open-endedness — that were the secrets to its success and, more generally, make it a good feminist theory.
Anthias, F. (1998) `Rethinking Social Divisions: Some Notes Towards a Theoretical Framework', Sociological Review46(3): 557—80.
2.
Anthias, F. and N. Yuval-Davis (1983) `Contextualizing Feminism: Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions', Feminist Review15: 62—75.
3.
Brah, A. (1996) Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities . London: Routledge.
4.
Brah, A. and A. Phoenix (2004) `Ain't I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality' , Journal of International Women's Studies5(3): 75—86.
5.
Brown, W. (2001) Politics out of History. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
6.
Buitelaar, M. (2006) `“I Am the Ultimate Challenge”: Accounts of Intersectionality in the Life-Story of a Well-Known Daughter of Moroccan Migrant Workers in the Netherlands', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 259—76.
7.
Burman, E. (2003) `From Difference to Intersectionality: Challenges and Resources', European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling and Health6(4): 293—308.
8.
Butler, J. (1989) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
9.
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of `Sex'. New York: Routledge.
10.
Butler, J. and J.W. Scott (1992) `Introduction', pp. xiii—xvii in J. Butler and J. W. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York : Routledge.
11.
Carby, H. (1982) `White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood', pp. 212—35 in The Centre for ContemporaryStudies (ed.) The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Realism in 70s Britain. London: Hutchinson.
12.
Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Collins, P.H. (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Power and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
14.
Collins, P.H. (2000) `It's All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation', pp. 156—76 in U. Narayan and S. Harding (eds) Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Crenshaw, K. (1989) `Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics', University of Chicago Legal Forum14: 538—54.
16.
Crenshaw, K. (1991) `Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color', Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241—99.
17.
Crenshaw, K. (1992) `Whose Story Is It, Anyway? Feminist and Antiracist Appropriations of Anita Hill', pp. 402—40 in T. Morrison (ed.) Race-ing Justice, En-gendering Power. New York: Pantheon Books.
18.
Davis, A.Y. (1981) Women, Race, and Class. New York: Random House.
19.
Davis, K. (1992) `Toward a Feminist Rhetoric: The Gilligan-Debate Revisited', Women's Studies International Forum15(2): 219—31.
20.
Davis, M.S. (1971) `That's Interesting! Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology', Philosophy of the Social Sciences1: 309—44.
21.
Davis, M.S. (1986) `“That's Classic!” The Phenomenology and Rhetoric of Successful Social Theories', Philosophy of the Social Sciences16: 285—301.
22.
Felski, R. (1997) `The Doxa of Difference', Signs23(1): 1—69.
23.
Gilligan, C. (1982) In A Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Haraway, D.J. (1980) `Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980's', Socialist Review80: 65—108.
25.
Haraway, D.J. (1988) `Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective', Feminist Studies14(3): 575—99.
26.
Hekman, S., N. Hartsock, P.H. Collins, S. Harding and D. Smith (1997) `Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited ', Signs22(2): 341—402.
27.
Henwood, K., C. Griffin and A. Phoenix, eds (1998) Standpoints and Differences. London: SAGE.
28.
hooks, b. (1981) Ain't I a Woman?: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
29.
hooks, b. (1992) Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston, MA: South End Press.
30.
hooks, b. (1994) Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations. New York: Routledge.
31.
Hull, G. T., P. B. Scott and B. Smith, eds (1982) All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women's Studies. Old Westbury : Feminist Press.
32.
King, D. (1988) `Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology', Signs14(1): 42—72.
33.
Knapp, G.-A. (1999) `Fragile Foundations, Strong Traditions, Situated Questioning: Critical Theory in German-Speaking Feminism', pp. 119—41 in M. O'Neill (ed.) Adorno, Culture and Feminism . London: SAGE.
34.
Knapp, G.-A. (2005) `Race, Class, Gender: Reclaiming Baggage in Fast Travelling Theories', European Journal of Women's Studies12(3): 249—66.
35.
Knudsen, S.V. (2006) `Intersectionality — A Theoretical Inspiration in the Analysis of Minority Cultures and Identities in Textbooks', pp. 61—76 in E. Bruillard, B. Aamotsbakken, S. V. Knudsen and M. Horsley (eds) Caught in the Web or Lost in the Textbook?Caen: IARTEM, Stef, Iufm.
36.
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
37.
Leiprecht, R. and H. Lutz (2006) `Intersektionalität im Klassenzimmer: Ethnizität, Klasse, Geschlecht', pp. 218—34 in R. Leiprecht and A. Kerber (eds) Schule in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.
38.
Ludwig, A. (2006) `Differences Between Women? Intersecting Voices in a Female Narrative', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 245—58.
39.
Lugones, M. and E.V. Spelman (1983) `Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for “The Woman's Voice”' , Women's Studies International Forum6(6): 573—81.
40.
Lutz, H. (2002) `Zonder blikken of blozen. Het standpunt van de (nieuw-) realisten', Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies5(3): 7—17.
41.
Lutz, H. and K. Davis (2005) `Geschlechterforschung und Biografieforschung: Intersektionalität als biographische Ressource am Beispiel einer außergewöhnlichen Frau', pp. 228—47 in B. Völter, B. Dausien, H. Lutz and G. Rosenthal (eds) Biographieforschung im Diskurs. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
42.
Lutz, H. and N. Wenning (2001) `Differenzen über Differenz — Einführung in die Debatten', pp. 11—24 in H. Lutz and N. Wenning (eds) Unterschiedlich Verschieden. Differenz in der Erziehungswissenschaf. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
43.
Lykke, N. (2005) `Intersectionality Revisited: Problems and Potentials' , Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift2(3): 7—17.
44.
McCall, L. (2005) `The Complexity of Intersectionality', Signs30(3): 1771—800.
45.
Mani, L. (1989) `Multiple Mediations: Feminist Scholarship in the Age of Multinational Reception', Inscriptions5: 1—24.
46.
Matsuda, M.J. (1991) `Beside My Sister, Facing the Enemy: Legal Theory out of Coalition', Stanford Law Review43(6): 1183—92.
47.
Merton, R.K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Mohanty, C.T. (1988) `Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses', Feminist Review30: 61—88.
49.
Mohanty, C.T. (2003) Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
Moi, T. (2000) Sex, Gender, and the Body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Moraga, C. and G. Anzaldúa , eds (1983) This Bridge Called My Back: Writing by Radical Women of Color. New York: Kitchen Table Press.
52.
Moya, P.M.L. (2001) `Chicana Feminism and Postmodernist Theory', Signs26(2): 441—83.
53.
Nicholson, L. and S. Seidman , eds (1995) Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Pfeil, F. (1994) `No Basta Teorizar: In-Difference to Solidarity in Contemporary Fiction, Theory, and Practice', pp. 197—230 in I. Grewal and C. Kaplan (eds) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
55.
Phoenix, A. (2006) `Editorial: Intersectionality', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 187—92.
56.
Prins, B. (2006) `Narrative Accounts of Origins: A Blind Spot in the Intersectional Approach', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 277—90.
57.
Riley, D. (1988) `Am I That Name?' Feminism and the Category of `Women' in History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58.
Saharso, S. (2002) `Een vrouw met twee missies. Reactie op Helma Lutz' , Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies5(3): 18—23.
59.
Scott, J.W. (1992) `Experience', pp. 22—40 in J. Butler and J. W. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
60.
Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable . London: SAGE.
61.
Smith, B., ed. (1983) Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology. New York: Kitchen Table/Women of Color Press.
62.
Spelman, E. (1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.
63.
Spivak, G.C. (1993) Outside in the Teaching Machine. London: Routledge.
64.
Stanley, L. and S. Wise (2000) `But the Empress has no Clothes! Some Awkward Questions about the “Missing Revolution” in Feminist Theory', Feminist Theory1(3): 261—88.
65.
Staunæs, D. (2003) `Where Have all the Subjects Gone? Bringing together the Concepts of Intersectionality and Subjectification', Nora11(2): 101—10.
66.
Trinh, M.T. (1989) Woman/Native/Other: Writing, Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
67.
Verloo, M. (2006) `Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and theEuropean Union', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 211—28.
68.
Ware, V. (1992) Beyond the Pale: White Women, Racism and History . London: Verso.
69.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997) Gender and Nation. London: SAGE.
70.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) `Intersectionality and Feminist Politics', European Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 193—210.
71.
Zack, N. (2007) `Can Third Wave Feminism Be Inclusive? Intersectionality, its Problems, and New Directions', pp. 193—207 in L. M. Alcoff and E. F. Kittay (eds) Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
72.
Zinn, M. B. and B. T. Dill, eds (1994) Women of Color in US Society . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
