This article serves as a welcoming introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies, written to accompany (and intended to be read prior to) the Virtual Special Issue on ‘Doing Critical Feminist Research’. In recalling our own respective journeys into the exciting field of feminist research, we invite new readers in appreciating the steep learning curve out of conventional science. This article begins by sketching out the emergence of feminist scholarship – focusing particularly on the discipline of psychology – to show readers how and why feminist scholars sought to depart from conventional science. In doing so, we explain the emergence of three main ways of doing and thinking about research (i.e. epistemologies): feminist empiricism, standpoint theory, and the various ‘turn to language’ movements (social constructionism, constructivism, postmodernism, poststructuralism). We then connect the dots between feminist epistemologies, methodologies and methods. We close by offering suggestions to guide the readers in using the Virtual Special Issue on their respective research journeys.
BelleD.DoucetJ. (2003) Poverty, inequality, and discrimination as sources of depression among U.S. women. Psychology of Women Quarterly27: 101–113.
3.
BurnsM. (2003) I. Interviewing: Embodied communication. Feminism & Psychology13(2): 229–236.
4.
BurrV. (1995) An introduction to social constructionism, London, UK: Routledge.
5.
CampbellR.WascoS. M. (2000) Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology28(6): 773–791.
6.
CarrollL. (1865) Alice’s adventures in wonderland, London, UK: Macmillan.
7.
ChenX. F.CheungF. M. (2011) Feminist psychology in China. In: RutherfordA.CapdevilaR.UndurtiV.PalmaryI. (eds) Handbook of international feminisms, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 269–292.
8.
CollinsP. H. (1990) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
9.
CollinsP. H. (1992) Transforming the inner circle: Dorothy Smith’s challenge to sociological theory. Sociological Theory10(1): 73–80.
10.
CookJ. A.FonowM. M. (1986) Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry56(1): 2–29.
11.
CrawfordM.MarecekJ. (1989) Psychology reconstructs the female 1968–1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(2): 147–165.
12.
CrenshawK. (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
13.
CrossleyM. (2007) Critical health psychology: Developing and refining the approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(1): 21–33.
14.
DeVaultM. L. (1996) Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology22: 29–50.
15.
FineM. (2016) Just methods in revolting times. Qualitative Research in Psychology13(4): 347–365.
16.
FineM.GordonS. M. (1989) Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In: CrawfordM.GentryM. (eds) Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 146–174.
17.
GaveyN. (1989) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 459–475.
18.
GergenK. J. (1992) Toward a postmodern psychology. In: KvaleS. (eds) Psychology and postmodernism, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 17–30.
19.
GilliganC. (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
GrabeS. (2018) Transnational feminism in psychology: Women’s human rights, liberation and social justice. In: HammackP. L. (eds) The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice (pp. 193–2013), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
HarawayD. (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminism Studies14(3): 575–599.
22.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23.
HardingS. (1992) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”?The Centennial Review36(3): 437–470.
24.
HardingS. (1996) Gendered ways of knowing and the “epistemological crisis” of the West. In: GoldbergerN. R. (eds) Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing, 1st ed.. New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 431–454.
25.
HardingS.NorbergK. (2005) New feminist approaches to social science methodologies: An introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30(4): 2009–2015.
26.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1988) The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist43(6): 455–464.
27.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (Eds.). (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1994) Asking the right questions: Feminist psychology and sex differences. Feminism & Psychology4(4): 531–537.
29.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2012) Feminist research: Exploring, interrogating, and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology, and method. In: Hesse-BiberS. N. (eds) Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 1–26.
30.
HollwayW. (1994) V. Beyond sex differences: A project of feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology4(4): 538–546.
31.
hooksb. (1990) Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics, Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.
32.
HundlebyC. (2012) Feminist empiricism. In: Hesse-BiberS. N. (eds) Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 29–44.
33.
KohlbergL.KramerR. (1969) Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development12(2): 93–120.
34.
Lafrance, M. N., & Wigginton, B. (Eds.) (2019). Doing critical feminist research: A Feminism & Psychology reader. Feminism & Psychology. doi:10.1177/0959353519863075.
35.
LeeC. (2006) Critical health psychology: Who benefits?Journal of Health Psychology11(3): 355–359.
36.
MacleodC. (2006) Radical plural feminisms and emancipatory practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Theory & Psychology16(3): 367–389.
37.
MagnussonE.MarecekJ. (2017) Feminisms, psychologies, and the study of social life. In: GoughB. (eds) The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology, London, UK: Springer Nature, pp. 17–35.
38.
Marecek, J. (2003). Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
OakleyA. (1998) Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology32(4): 707–731.
41.
ParkerI. (1992) Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology, London, UK: Routledge.
42.
ParkerI. (2007) Critical psychology: What it is and what it is not. Social and Personality Psychology Compass1(1): 1–15.
43.
PeplauL. A.ConradE. (1989) Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 379–400.
44.
RadtkeL. H. (2017) Feminist theory in Feminism & Psychology [part 1]: Dealing with differences and negotiating the biological. Feminism & Psychology27(3): 357–377.
45.
RigerS. (1992) Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist47(6): 730–740.
46.
SmithD. E. (1987) The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
47.
SmithD. E. (1991) Writing women’s experiences into social science. Feminism & Psychology1(1): 155–169.
48.
StaceyJ.ThorneB. (1985) The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems32(4): 301–316.
49.
TavrisC. (1993) The mismeasure of woman. Feminism & Psychology3(2): 149–168.
50.
UssherJ. M. (1999) Feminist approaches to qualitative health research. In: MurrayM.ChamberlainK. (eds) Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 98–114.
51.
WeedonC. (1987) Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory, New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
52.
WeissteinN. (1993 [1968]) Kinder, kuche, kirche, as scientific laws: Psychology constructs the female, Boston, MA: New England Free Press.
53.
WilkinsonS. (1988) The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum11(5): 493–502.
54.
WilkinsonS. (1997) Feminist psychology. In: FoxD.PrilleltenskyI. (eds) Critical psychology: An introduction, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 247–264.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
