Learning critical feminist research: A brief introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies

Abstract

This article serves as a welcoming introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies, written to accompany (and intended to be read prior to) the Virtual Special Issue on ‘Doing Critical Feminist Research’. In recalling our own respective journeys into the exciting field of feminist research, we invite new readers in appreciating the steep learning curve out of conventional science. This article begins by sketching out the emergence of feminist scholarship – focusing particularly on the discipline of psychology – to show readers how and why feminist scholars sought to depart from conventional science. In doing so, we explain the emergence of three main ways of doing and thinking about research (i.e. epistemologies): feminist empiricism, standpoint theory, and the various ‘turn to language’ movements (social constructionism, constructivism, postmodernism, poststructuralism). We then connect the dots between feminist epistemologies, methodologies and methods. We close by offering suggestions to guide the readers in using the Virtual Special Issue on their respective research journeys.

Keywords

critical feminist methodology research epistemology feminist empiricism standpoint theory social constructionism postmodernism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, E. (2011). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy Online. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/.

Belle

Doucet

(2003) Poverty, inequality, and discrimination as sources of depression among U.S. women. Psychology of Women Quarterly 27: 101–113.

Burns

(2003) I. Interviewing: Embodied communication. Feminism & Psychology 13(2): 229–236.

Burr

(1995) An introduction to social constructionism, London, UK: Routledge.

Campbell

Wasco

S. M.

(2000) Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology 28(6): 773–791.

Carroll

(1865) Alice’s adventures in wonderland, London, UK: Macmillan.

Chen

X. F.

Cheung

F. M.

(2011) Feminist psychology in China. In: Rutherford

Capdevila

Undurti

Palmary

(eds) Handbook of international feminisms, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 269–292.

Collins

P. H.

(1990) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

Collins

P. H.

(1992) Transforming the inner circle: Dorothy Smith’s challenge to sociological theory. Sociological Theory 10(1): 73–80.

10.

Cook

J. A.

Fonow

M. M.

(1986) Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry 56(1): 2–29.

11.

Crawford

Marecek

(1989) Psychology reconstructs the female 1968–1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13(2): 147–165.

12.

Crenshaw

(1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.

13.

Crossley

(2007) Critical health psychology: Developing and refining the approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(1): 21–33.

14.

DeVault

M. L.

(1996) Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 29–50.

15.

Fine

(2016) Just methods in revolting times. Qualitative Research in Psychology 13(4): 347–365.

16.

Fine

Gordon

S. M.

(1989) Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In: Crawford

Gentry

(eds) Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 146–174.

17.

Gavey

(1989) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13(4): 459–475.

18.

Gergen

K. J.

(1992) Toward a postmodern psychology. In: Kvale

(eds) Psychology and postmodernism, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 17–30.

19.

Gilligan

(1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Grabe

(2018) Transnational feminism in psychology: Women’s human rights, liberation and social justice. In: Hammack

P. L.

(eds) The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice (pp. 193–2013), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

21.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminism Studies 14(3): 575–599.

22.

Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

23.

Harding

(1992) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? The Centennial Review 36(3): 437–470.

24.

Harding

(1996) Gendered ways of knowing and the “epistemological crisis” of the West. In: Goldberger

N. R.

(eds) Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing, 1st ed.. New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 431–454.

25.

Harding

Norberg

(2005) New feminist approaches to social science methodologies: An introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(4): 2009–2015.

26.

Hare-Mustin

R. T.

Marecek

(1988) The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist 43(6): 455–464.

27.

Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (Eds.). (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

28.

Hare-Mustin

R. T.

Marecek

(1994) Asking the right questions: Feminist psychology and sex differences. Feminism & Psychology 4(4): 531–537.

29.

Hesse-Biber

S. N.

(2012) Feminist research: Exploring, interrogating, and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology, and method. In: Hesse-Biber

S. N.

(eds) Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 1–26.

30.

Hollway

(1994) V. Beyond sex differences: A project of feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology 4(4): 538–546.

31.

hooks

(1990) Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics, Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.

32.

Hundleby

(2012) Feminist empiricism. In: Hesse-Biber

S. N.

(eds) Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 29–44.

33.

Kohlberg

Kramer

(1969) Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development 12(2): 93–120.

34.

Lafrance, M. N., & Wigginton, B. (Eds.) (2019). Doing critical feminist research: A Feminism & Psychology reader. Feminism & Psychology. doi:10.1177/0959353519863075.

35.

Lee

(2006) Critical health psychology: Who benefits? Journal of Health Psychology 11(3): 355–359.

36.

Macleod

(2006) Radical plural feminisms and emancipatory practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Theory & Psychology 16(3): 367–389.

37.

Magnusson

Marecek

(2017) Feminisms, psychologies, and the study of social life. In: Gough

(eds) The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology, London, UK: Springer Nature, pp. 17–35.

38.

Marecek, J. (2003). Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

39.

Naples, N. A. (2007). Feminist standpoint theory. In Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology Online. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosf044.pub2.

40.

Oakley

(1998) Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology 32(4): 707–731.

41.

Parker

(1992) Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology, London, UK: Routledge.

42.

Parker

(2007) Critical psychology: What it is and what it is not. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 1(1): 1–15.

43.

Peplau

L. A.

Conrad

(1989) Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13(4): 379–400.

44.

Radtke

L. H.

(2017) Feminist theory in Feminism & Psychology [part 1]: Dealing with differences and negotiating the biological. Feminism & Psychology 27(3): 357–377.

45.

Riger

(1992) Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist 47(6): 730–740.

46.

Smith

D. E.

(1987) The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

47.

Smith

D. E.

(1991) Writing women’s experiences into social science. Feminism & Psychology 1(1): 155–169.

48.

Stacey

Thorne

(1985) The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems 32(4): 301–316.

49.

Tavris

(1993) The mismeasure of woman. Feminism & Psychology 3(2): 149–168.

50.

Ussher

J. M.

(1999) Feminist approaches to qualitative health research. In: Murray

Chamberlain

(eds) Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 98–114.

51.

Weedon

(1987) Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory, New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

52.

Weisstein

(1993 [1968]) Kinder, kuche, kirche, as scientific laws: Psychology constructs the female, Boston, MA: New England Free Press.

53.

Wilkinson

(1988) The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum 11(5): 493–502.

54.

Wilkinson

(1997) Feminist psychology. In: Fox

Prilleltensky

(eds) Critical psychology: An introduction, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 247–264.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB