Commercially available prosthetic feet are expensive due to the use of advanced composite materials, typically consisting of a thermosetting polymer matrix reinforced with continuous carbon fibers, and the highly labor-intensive manufacturing processes required for their production. Furthermore, carbon fiber laminates present significant environmental challenges due to their energy-intensive fabrication and limited recyclability.
This work proposes an innovative design methodology for custom prosthetic feet utilizing bamboo laminate, a sustainable, cost-effective, and widely accessible material. The work begins with a comprehensive analysis of existing prosthetic solutions, including an evaluation of commercial prosthetic models and their compliance with established biomechanical and engineering standards. Then the drawn design principles of prosthetics feet are systematically applied, encompassing material selection and the optimization of geometric parameters to closely replicate the mechanical behavior and user comfort of conventional prosthetic feet. The roll-over shapes of the feet are utilized as reference metric to evaluate the feet design.
Then a specific commercial prosthetic foot is reverse-engineered and experimentally tested. The data and the drawn design method are used for the design, the development, the validation, and the refinement of the bamboo laminate prosthetic feet. Moreover, design constraints related to aesthetics and functionality are considered. The designed bamboo laminate prosthetic foot achieves a strength-to-weight ratio comparable to that of carbon fiber laminates, with a stiffness variation of less than 10% and a marginal increase in height of only 1.35%.
Therefore, the feasibility of bamboo laminate prosthetic foot is confirmed. The proposed design is an high-performance, cost-efficient, and environmentally sustainable alternative to the commercial prosthetic foot for a broader population of users.
AghaRAMuneerHAlqaseerA, et al.Major lower limb amputation: Causes, characteristics and complications. Bahrain Med Bull2017; 39: 159–161. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0047632.
2.
YuanBHuDGuS, et al.The global burden of traumatic amputation in 204 countries and territories. Front Public Health2023; 11: 1–15. Epub ahead of print 20 October 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258853.
3.
LegnaniGPalmieriGFassiI. Introduzione alla biomeccanica dello sport. Torino: CittàStudi, 2018.
4.
BartlettHLKingSTGoldfarbM, et al.Model based design of a low cost and compliant low profile prosthetic foot. J Biomech Eng2022; 144: 1–9. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052369.
5.
HansenAHChildressDSKnoxEH. Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed. Clin Biomech2004; 19: 407–414.
6.
CurtzeCHofALvan KeekenHG, et al.Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet. J Biomech2009; 42: 1746–1753.
7.
ElgamsyRAwadMIRamadanN, et al.Localization of composite prosthetic feet: manufacturing processes and production guidelines. Sci Rep2023; 13: 1–14. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44008-7.
8.
VersluysRDesomerALenaertsG, et al.From conventional prosthetic feet to bionic feet: a review study. In: 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE, 2008, pp. 49–54.
9.
ResanKKAbbodEAAl-HamdiTK. Prosthetic feet: A systematic review of types, design, and characteristics. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc., 2023. Epub ahead of print 1 September 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163345.
10.
MutluAKharootyMDYakutY. The effect of segmental weight of prosthesis on hemodynamic responses and energy expenditure of lower extremity amputees. J Phys Ther Sci2017; 29: 629–634. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.629.
11.
OleiwiJKHadiAN. Properties of materials and models of prosthetic feet: a review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1094: 012151.
12.
TileyAR and Henry Dreyfuss. The measure of man and woman: human factors in design. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications, 2001.
13.
RuncimanPCockcroftJDermanW. A novel pivot ankle/foot prosthesis reduces sound side loading and risk for osteoarthritis: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int2022; 46: 258–266.
14.
HansenAHMeierMRSessomsPH, et al.The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int2006; 30: 286–299.
15.
DaiCYuPLongJ. Study on multilevel optimization strategy of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer seatback and seat pan. Int J Mech Mater Des2024; 21: 209–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-024-09734-4.
16.
SayamARahmanANMMRahmanMS, et al.A review on carbon fiber-reinforced hierarchical composites: mechanical performance, manufacturing process, structural applications and allied challenges. Carbon Letters2022; 32: 1173–1205.
17.
WangJChenLShenW, et al.Research on tensile properties of carbon fiber composite laminates. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122318
18.
HuYLadaniRBBrandtM, et al.Carbon fibre damage during 3D printing of polymer matrix laminates using the FDM process. Mater Des2021; 205: 109679.
19.
DasRKumarGS. A comprehensive study on numerical homogenization of re-entrant honeycomb lattice and analytical model assessment. Int J Mech Mater Des2024; 21: 181–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-024-09732-6.
20.
FolinusCAmosGWinterV. Design and mechanical validation of commercially viable, personalized passive prosthetic feet. J Mech Des2023; 147: 1–29.
21.
HolmesJWBrøndstedPSørensenBF, et al.Development of a bamboo-based composite as a sustainable green material for wind turbine blades. Wind Eng2009; 33: 197–210.
22.
AvalleMFrascioM. Mechanical characterization and modeling of glass fiber-reinforced polyamide built by additive manufacturing. Materials (Basel)2025; 18: 745.
23.
AvalleMMontiMFrascioM. Modeling the strength of laminated parts made by fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2023; 1: 095440622311614.
24.
FrascioMZafferaniAMontiM, et al.Investigating enhanced interfacial adhesion in multi-material filament 3D printing: a comparative study of t and mickey mouse geometries. Prog Addit Manuf2024; 9: 2113–2122.
25.
JilichMFrascioMAvalleM, et al.Development of a gripper for garment handling designed for additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2019; 235: 1–12.
26.
BergonziLPirondiAMoroniF, et al.A study on fused filament fabrication (FFF) parameters as bonded joint design factors. J Adhes2021; 100: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2020.1862655.
27.
FrascioMMorchioSMusiariF, et al.Investigating multi-material additive manufacturing for disassembly and reparability of adhesive joints by precision heating. Adhesives2025; 1: 4.
28.
FrascioMMoroniFMarquesE, et al.Feasibility study on hybrid weld-bonded joints using additive manufacturing and conductive thermoplastic filament. J Adv Join Process2021; 1: 1–9.
29.
Al ThahabiARNMartulliLMRolloG, et al.Numerical design and experimental validation of a 3D-printed composite energy-storage-and-return prosthetic foot. Compos Struct2025; 358: 118907.
30.
MartulliLMRahmanATahabiA, et al.Design and optimisation of a 3D printed composite prosthetic foot: a finite element feasibility study. In: Composites Meet Sustainability – Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Composite Materials. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-298799_978-2-9701614-0-0.
31.
YaoXLuanCZhangD, et al.Evaluation of carbon fiber-embedded 3D printed structures for strengthening and structural-health monitoring. Mater Des2017; 114: 424–432.
32.
MartulliLMSalaRRolloG, et al.Preliminary stiffness-driven redesign of a laminated prosthetic component using additive manufacturing. Polymers (Basel)2022; 15: 346–361Epub ahead of print 1 January 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020346.
33.
VijayanVKumarSAGauthamS, et al.Design and analysis of prosthetic foot using additive manufacturing technique. In: Materials today: proceedings. United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd, 2020, pp. 1665–1671.
34.
TaoZAhnHJLianC, et al.Design and optimization of prosthetic foot by using polylactic acid 3D printing. J Mech Sci Technol2017; 31: 2393–2398.
35.
RochlitzBPammerD. Design and analysis of 3D printable foot prosthesis. Period Polytech Mech Eng2017; 61: 282–287.
36.
FalbriardMHuotGJanierM, et al.A functional approach towards the design, development, and test of an affordable dynamic prosthetic foot. PLoS One2022; 17: 1–20. Epub ahead of print 1 May 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266656.
37.
Brett JohnsonWProstVMukulP, et al.Design and evaluation of a high-performance, low-cost prosthetic foot for developing countries. J Med Devices, Trans ASME2023; 17. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2023. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055967
38.
SamMChildressDSHansenAH, et al.The ‘shape&roll’ prosthetic foot: i. Design and development of appropriate technology for low-income countries. Med Confl Surviv2004; 20: 294–306.
39.
RyuSCKimJHSimWS, et al.Development of an elastic storage-release prosthetic foot that mimics the metatarsal bone head and midtarsal joint. J Mech Sci Technol2023; 37: 2109–2117.
40.
AliSMMahmoodSS. Design and manufacturing of a low-cost prosthetic foot. Ing Invest2023; 43: 1–11. Epub ahead of print 4 August 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.98916.
41.
HolmesJWBrøndstedPSørensenBF, et al.Development of a bamboo-based composite as a sustainable green material for wind turbine blades. Wind Eng2009; 33: 197–210.
42.
EscamillaEZZurichE. Development of simplified life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology for construction materials and buildings outside of the european context through the use of geographic Information. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10229.58081.
43.
PearlmanJCooperRKrizackM, et al.Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries: an overview. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag2008; 27: 12–22.
44.
TavangarianF. The need to fabricate lower limb prosthetic devices by additive manufacturing. Biomed J Sci Tech Res2019; 15: 11662–11673. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2019.15.002772.
45.
RamachandranKGnanasagaranCLVekariyaA. Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber and bio-fiber composites prepared via vacuum bagging technique. J Manuf Process2023; 89: 124–131.
46.
ZhangHWuYWangK, et al.Materials selection of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites considering multiple criteria. Mater Des2020; 196: 109140.
47.
AbderrafaiYHadi MahdaviMSosa-ReyF, et al.Additive manufacturing of short carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide composites by fused filament fabrication: formulation, manufacturing and characterization. Mater Des2022; 214: 110358.
48.
TomkinMGholizadehHSinitskiE, et al.Transtibial amputee gait with the pro-flex foot during level, decline, and incline walking. Can Prosthet Orthot J2018; 1: 26–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32003.
49.
HansenAH. Scientific methods to determine functional performance of prosthetic ankle-foot systems. J Prosthet Orthot. 2005; 17: 23–29. Epub ahead of print 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00008526-200510001-00008.
50.
ShercliffHRAshbyMF. Elastic structures in design. In: Reference module in materials science and materials engineering. Elsevier, 2016. Epub ahead of print 2016. 23–29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.02944-1.
51.
NelsonTGBrutonJTRieskeNE, et al.Material selection shape factors for compliant arrays in bending. Mater Des2016; 110: 865–877.
El KhalloufiMDrevelleOSoucyG. Titanium: an overview of resources and production methods. Minerals2021; 11: 1425.
54.
CastellanosSCavaleiroAJesusAd, et al.Machinability of titanium aluminides: a review. Proc Institut Mech Eng L: J Mater: Des Appl2019; 233: 426–451.
55.
SzymczakTMakowskaKKowalewskiZL, et al.An influence of impact energy on magnesium alloy behaviour. Int J Mech Mater Des2020; 16: 139–153.
56.
KarunakaranROrtgiesSTamayolA, et al.Additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. Bioact Mater2020; 5: 44–54.
57.
XuPZhuJLiH, et al.Coupling analysis between cost and carbon emission of bamboo building materials: a perspective of supply chain. Energy Build2023; 280: 112718.
58.
SujithraRSarithaD. Development of biocomposites using novel green pea pod lignin and hybridized pod sheath fibre-bamboo epoxy composite for human prosthetic application. Proc Institut Mech Eng L: J Mater: Des Appl2024; 238: 2120–2130.
59.
SharmaBGatooABockM, et al.Engineered bamboo: state of the art. Proc Institut Civil Eng - Construct Mater2015; 168: 57–67.
60.
AlthahabiARNMartulliLMRolloG, et al.Numerical design and experimental validation of a 3D-printed composite energy-storage-and-return prosthetic foot. Compos Struct2025; 358: 118907.
61.
LvQLiuY. Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of BFRP-bamboo composite beam. Adv Compos Lett2019; 28: 1–13. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963693519867335.
62.
NiLZhangXLiuH, et al.Manufacture and mechanical properties of glued bamboo laminates. Bioresources2016; 11: 4459–4471. Epub ahead of print 4 April 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.4459-4471.
63.
KumarDMandalA. Review on manufacturing and fundamental aspects of laminated bamboo products for structural applications. Constr Build Mater2022; 348: 128691.
64.
ChenGYuYLiX, et al.Mechanical behavior of laminated bamboo lumber for structural application: an experimental investigation. Eur J Wood Wood Product2020; 78: 53–63.
65.
ShiJYuanSZhangW, et al.Hydrothermal aging mechanisms and service life prediction of twisted bamboo fiber wound composites. Mater Des2023; 227: 111716.
66.
NugrohoNAndoN. Development of structural composite products made from bamboo II: fundamental properties of laminated bamboo lumber. J Wood Sci2001; 47: 237–242.
67.
ChenGYuYLiX, et al.Mechanical behavior of laminated bamboo lumber for structural application: an experimental investigation. Eur J Wood Wood Product2020; 78: 53–63.
68.
NiLZhangXLiuH, et al.Manufacture and mechanical properties of glued bamboo laminates. Bioresources2016; 11: 4459–4471. Epub ahead of print 4 April 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.2.4459-4471.
69.
VermaCSSharmaNKChariarVM, et al.Comparative study of mechanical properties of bamboo laminae and their laminates with woods and wood based composites. Compos B Eng2014; 60: 523–530.
70.
VermaCSChariarVM. Development of layered laminate bamboo composite and their mechanical properties. Compos B Eng2012; 43: 1063–1069.
71.
VermaCSPurohitRRanaRS, et al.Mechanical properties of bamboo laminates with other composites. Mater Today Proc2017; 4: 3380–3386.
72.
PlattsMJ. Strength, fatigue strength and stiffness of high-tech bamboo/epoxy composites. Agricul Sci2014; 05: 1281–1290.
73.
DongshengHAipingZYulingB. Experimental and analytical study on the nonlinear bending of parallel strand bamboo beams. Constr Build Mater2013; 44: 585–592.
74.
HuangDBianYZhouA, et al.Experimental study on stress–strain relationships and failure mechanisms of parallel strand bamboo made from phyllostachys. Constr Build Mater2015; 77: 130–138.
75.
SharmaBGatóoABockM, et al.Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Constr Build Mater2015; 81: 66–73.
76.
WeiYTangSJiX, et al.Stress-strain behavior and model of bamboo scrimber under cyclic axial compression. Eng Struct2020; 209: 110279.
77.
WeiYJiXDuanM, et al.Flexural performance of bamboo scrimber beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer. Constr Build Mater2017; 142: 66–82.
78.
WangZWeiYHuY, et al.An investigation of the flexural performance of bamboo-concrete composite beams with precast light concrete slabs and dowel connectors. J Build Eng2021; 41: 102759.
79.
CorrealJFEcheverryJSRamírezF, et al.Experimental evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of glued laminated Guadua angustifolia kunth. Constr Build Mater2014; 73: 105–112.
80.
LiZXiaMKShiJJ, et al.Shear properties of composite cross-laminated bamboo panels. Eur J Wood Wood Product2022; 80: 635–646.
81.
LiZHeXZCaiZM, et al.Mechanical properties of engineered bamboo boards for glubam structures. J Mater Civ Eng2021; 33. 1–13. Epub ahead of print May 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003657.
82.
Siti SuhailySIslamMNAsnizaM, et al.Physical, mechanical and morphological properties of laminated bamboo hybrid composite: a potential raw material for furniture manufacturing. Mater Res Express2020; 7: 075503.
83.
OlivierPCottuJPFerretB. Effects of cure cycle pressure and voids on some mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy laminates. Composites1995; 26: 509–515. Epub ahead of print 1995. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(95)96808-J.
84.
LiSChenDYuanY, et al.Influence of flexible molecular structure on the cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy matrix and carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminate. Mater Des2020; 195: 109028.
85.
CasoloFChiara ColomboLMV. Assisted contimization of trantibial prosthesis for amputees. In: 12th International symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics, Cape Town, South Africa, 2009.
86.
RahmaniHNajafiSHMSaffarzadeh-MatinS, et al.Mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites: effects of number of plies, fiber contents, and angle-ply layers. Polym Eng Sci2014; 54: 2676–2682.
87.
FanJHXiaoZHChengXX.Numerical simulations of modal tests on yingzhou bridge using a passing vehicle as the excitation. Exp Tech2022; 46: 529–541. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00484-y.
88.
XiaFLiuZSongQ.Boring bar with constrained damping. Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin2014; 35: 2375–2389. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0484.
89.
DerewokoAGieletaR. Carbon-epoxy composite fatigue strenght-experiment and FEM numerical espimation. 2012.
90.
GuXJBiQSZhangW, et al.Optimization of vibration analysis for functionally graded graphene platelets (FGGP) reinforced twisted cantilever thin shallow shell blades subjected to axial loading. Int J Mech Mater Des2024; 20: 933–958.
91.
WengFFangYRenM, et al.Effect of high strain rate on shear properties of carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2021; 203: 108599.
92.
LecomteCStarkerFGuðnadóttirE, et al.Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking. Med Eng Phys2020; 81: 13–21.
LüdersC. Nonlinear-elastic orthotropic material modeling of an epoxy-based polymer for predicting the material behavior of transversely loaded fiber-reinforced composites. J Composit Sci2020; 4: 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020046.
LecomteCÁrmannsdóttirALStarkerF, et al.Variable stiffness foot design and validation. J Biomech2021; 122: 110440.
98.
CavallaroLTessariFMilandriG, et al.Finite element modeling of an energy storing and return prosthetic foot and implications of stiffness on rollover shape. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2022; 236: 218–227.
99.
AhmedAUddinMNAkbarM, et al.Prediction of shear behavior of glass FRP bars-reinforced ultra-highperformance concrete I-shaped beams using machine learning. Int J Mech Mater Des2024; 20: 269–290.
100.
SharmaBGatooABockM, et al.Engineered bamboo: state of the art. Proc Institut Civil Eng: Construct Mater2015; 168: 57–67.
101.
SharmaBEleyDEmanuelO, et al.Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo designed for curvature. Constr Build Mater2021; 300: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123937.
102.
KelkarBUShuklaSRNagraikP, et al.Structural bamboo composites: A review of processing, factors affecting properties and recent advances. Adv Bamboo Sci2023; 3: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bamboo.2023.100026.
LiCWuRYangW. Optimization and selection of the multi-objective conceptual design scheme for considering product assembly, manufacturing and cost. SN Appl Sci2022; 4: 91.
105.
SharmaBGatóoABockM, et al.Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Constr Build Mater2015; 81: 66–73.
106.
SharmaBEleyDEmanuelO, et al.Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo designed for curvature. Constr Build Mater2021; 300: 123937.
107.
KimH-JTahkY-WJunH, et al.Establishment of the design stress intensity value for the plate-type fuel assembly using a tensile test. Nuclear Eng Technol2021; 53: 911–919.
108.
VermaCSPurohitRRanaRS, et al.Mechanical properties of bamboo laminates with other composites. Mater Today Proc2017; 4: 3380–3386.
109.
YoungTM. Impact of nd-YAG Laser drilling on the fatigue characteristics of APC-2A/AS4 thermoplastic composite material. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2008; 21: 543–555.
110.
MutluAKharootyMDYakutY. The effect of segmental weight of prosthesis on hemodynamic responses and energy expenditure of lower extremity amputees. J Phys Ther Sci2017; 29: 629–634.
