Soft smart materials have useful properties for addressing everyday problems affecting human health and well-being, having a positive societal impact. For instance, these materials can serve as sensors for breath monitoring or as soft actuators to stimulate muscles impaired by injury or illness. A notable example of their versatility lies in piezoelectric materials, which can function both as passive elements (utilising the direct piezoelectric effect) and as active elements (employing the converse piezoelectric effect). This dual functionality showcases the broad potential of smart materials in various applications. The present study is an in silico simulation of a wearable piezoelectric material (polyvinylidene fluoride - PVDF), using finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the effectiveness of the touch sensation provided by the haptic device on human skin, using different actuators geometries and voltage input intensities. Moreover, the main active element, a PVDF-based soft actuator, was fully characterised in terms of the piezoelectric matrix, using an inverse finite element approach. In conclusion, the findings point to promising results when using this haptic technology for re-educational therapies.
OrganisationWH. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities: executive summary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 2022. ISBN 978-92-4-006363-1.
2.
DesplenterTZhouYEdmondsBP, et al. Rehabilitative and assistive wearable mechatronic upper-limb devices: a review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng2020; 7: 205566832091787.
3.
MavroidisCNikitczukJWeinbergB, et al. Smart portable rehabilitation devices. In: Volume 7: 29th mechanisms and robotics conference, parts A and B. IDETC-CIE2005, ASMEDC. DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-85517.
4.
XieXLiuSYangC, et al. A review of smart materials in tactile actuators for information delivery. C2017; 3: 38.
HuYKangWFangY, et al. Piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) polymer-based sensor for wrist motion signal detection. Appl Sci2018; 8: 836.
8.
ZhangJYaoHMoJ, et al. Finger-inspired rigid-soft hybrid tactile sensor with superior sensitivity at high frequency. Nat Commun2022; 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32827-7.
9.
RazaUOhSTabassianR, et al. Micro-structured porous electrolytes for highly responsive ionic soft actuators. Sens Actuators B Chem2022; 352: 131006.
10.
FookTHTJeonJHLeePS. Transparent flexible polymer actuator with enhanced output force enabled by conductive nanowires interlayer. Adv Mater Technol2019; 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900762.
11.
PanCTChangCCYangYS, et al. Development of MMG sensors using PVDF piezoelectric electrospinning for lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton. Sens Actuators A Phys2020; 301: 111708.
12.
GariyaNKumarPPrasadB, et al. Soft pneumatic actuator with an embedded flexible polymeric piezoelectric membrane for sensing bending deformation. Mater Today Commun2023; 35: 105910.
13.
EgeESBalikciA. Transparent localized haptics: utilization of PVDF actuators on touch displays. Actuators2023; 12: 289.
14.
MaedaTPeirisRNakataniM, et al. Wearable haptic augmentation system using skin vibration sensor. In: Proceedings of the 2016 virtual reality international conference. VRIC ’16, ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2927929.2927946.
15.
JarockaEPruszynskiJAJohanssonRS. Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges. J Neurosci2021; 41: 3622–3634.
16.
AndréADTeixeiraAMMartinsP. Influence of DMSO non-toxic solvent on the mechanical and chemical properties of a PVDF thin film. Appl Sci2024; 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083356.
17.
AndréADCoondooIBdikinI, et al. Piezo-ionic actuator for haptic feedback; Submitted/Unpublished.
18.
176-1987 IEEE standard on piezoelectricity. Electronic resource type: Report.
19.
SerraoPHKozinovS. Robust mixed FE for analyses of higher-order electromechanical coupling in piezoelectric solids. Comput Mech2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02407-7.
20.
SchoeftnerJGahleitnerJ. Approximate analytical solutions for piezoelectric rectangular beams by using Boley-Tolins method. J Phys Commun2021; 5: 105015.
21.
ErturkA. Piezoelectric energy harvesting. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2011. ISBN 9780470682548.
22.
KalimuldinaGTurdakynNAbayI, et al. A review of piezoelectric PVDF film by electrospinning and its applications. Sensors2020; 20: 5214.
23.
MohammadpourfazeliSArashSAnsariA, et al. Future prospects and recent developments of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric polymer; fabrication methods, structure, and electro-mechanical properties. RSC Adv2023; 13: 370–387.
24.
WangXTongWChenY, et al. Effective mechanical energy harvesting from PVDF multilayers by head-to-head parallel assembly. ACS Appl Energy Mater2021; 4: 11133–11143.
25.
XieLWangGJiangC, et al. Properties and applications of flexible poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based piezoelectric materials. Crystals2021; 11: 644.
26.
SukumaranSChatbouriSRouxelD, et al. Recent advances in flexible PVDF based piezoelectric polymer devices for energy harvesting applications. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2020; 32: 746–780.
27.
del CastilloMPérezN. Machine learning identification of piezoelectric properties. Materials2021; 14: 2405.
28.
BystrovVSPullarRKholkinAL, et al. Modeling of switching and piezoelectric phenomena in polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF). In: 2013 Joint IEEE international symposium on applications of ferroelectric and workshop on piezoresponse force microscopy (ISAF/PFM). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/isaf.2013.6748703.
29.
ChapraSCCanaleRP. Numerical methods for engineers. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education, 2015. ISBN 9780073397924.
30.
RazaviSIannucciLGreenhalghE. Piezoelectric PVDF smart fibre for composite applications. In: Proceedings of the 17th European conference on composite materials ECCM17 - 17th European conference on composite materials, Munich, Germany. ECCM.
ShimawakiSSakaiN. Quasi-static deformation analysis of a human finger using a three-dimensional finite element model constructed from CT images. J Environ Eng2007; 2: 56–63.
33.
WuJZWelcomeDEDongRG. Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2006; 9: 55–63.
34.
IkemuraSEndoTMatsunoF. Multiple remote vibrotactile noises improve tactile sensitivity of the fingertip via stochastic resonance. IEEE Access2021; 9: 17011–17019.
LaiYSChenWCHuangCH, et al. The effect of graft strength on knee laxity and graft in-situ forces after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PLoS ONE2015; 10: e0127293.
37.
LiCGuanGReifR, et al. Determining elastic properties of skin by measuring surface waves from an impulse mechanical stimulus using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J R Soc Interface2011; 9: 831–841.
38.
WangQHaywardV. In vivo biomechanics of the fingerpad skin under local tangential traction. J Biomech2007; 40: 851–860.
39.
OdenwaldSSchwantizSKrummD. Tagungsband zum 14. Symposium der Sektion Sportinformatik und Sporttechnologie der Deutschen Vereinigung für Sportwissenschaft. Universitätsverlag Chemnitz. ISBN 978-3-96100-176-7.
40.
UchinoK. Introduction to piezoelectric actuators and transducers, 2003.
41.
DargahiJNajarianS. Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing—a review. Int J Med Rob Comput Assisted Surg2004; 1: 23–35.
42.
HellerMASchiffW. Psychology of touch. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis Group, 2013. ISBN 9781315799629.
