A novel dynamic soil-structure interaction model is developed for analysis for Euler–Bernoulli beam rests on a spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic foundation subjected to moving and oscillating loads. The dynamic equilibrium equation of beam-soil system is established using the extended Hamilton's principle, and the corresponding partial differential equations describing the displacement of beam and soil and boundary conditions are further obtained by the variational principles. These partial differential equations are discretized in spatial and time domains and solved by the finite difference (FD) method. After the differential equations of beam and soil are discretized in the spatial domain, the implicit iterative scheme is used to solve the equations in the time domain. The solving result shows the FD method is effective and convenient for solving the differential equations of beam-soil system. The spring foundation model adopted the modified Vlasov model, which is a two-parameter model considering the compression and shear of soil. The advantage of the present foundation model is avoided estimating input parameters of the modified Vlasov model using prior knowledge. The present solution is verified by publishing solution and equivalent three-dimensional FE analysis. The present model produced an accurate, faster, and effective displacement response. A few examples are carried out to analyze the parameter variation influence for beam on spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic soil under moving loads.
HuangMHThambiratnamDP. Dynamic response of plates on elastic foundation to moving loads. J Eng Mech2002; 128: 1016–1022.
2.
LiZNooriMBasuD, et al. Dynamic analysis of soil structure interaction shear model for beams on transversely isotropic viscoelastic soil. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021 (accepted in 01-Dec-2021 in the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers); In press, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pila
3.
LiZNooriMZhaoY, et al. A multi-objective optimization algorithm for Bouc–Wen–Baber–Noori model to identify reinforced concrete columns failing in different modes. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021; 235: 2165–2182, https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207211020028
4.
KimSMRoessetJM. Dynamic response of a beam on a frequency-independent damped elastic foundation to moving load. Can J Civ Eng. 2011; 30: 460–467.
5.
KimSMRoessetJM. Dynamic response of a beam on a frequency-independent damped elastic foundation to moving load. Can J Civ Eng. 2003; 30: l02–109.
6.
HasheminejadSMRafsanjaniA. Two-dimensional elasticity solution for transient response of simply supported beams under moving loads. Acta Mech. 2011; 217: 205–218.
7.
BogaczR. On dynamics and stability of continuous systems subjected to a distributed moving load. Ing-Arch. 1983; 53: 243–255.
8.
TretheweyJ. Finite element analysis of an elastic beam structure subjected to a moving distributed mass train. Mech Syst Signal Process. 1999; 13: 31–51.
9.
LiZNooriMAltabeyWA. An experimental study on the seismic performance of adobe walls. Struct Durab Health Monit2020; 15: 103–123, https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2021.011193.
10.
IwankiewiczRNiadyP. Vibration of a beam under a random stream of moving forces. J Struct Mech. 1984; 12: 13–26.
11.
YongAZPengRG. Dynamic response of an infinite beam on a transversely isotropic multilayered half-space due to a moving load. Int J Mech Sci. 2017; 133: 817–828.
12.
WangTNooriMAltabeyWA,et al.Parameter identification and dynamic response analysis of a modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii asymmetric hysteresis model via least-mean square algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021; 235(12): 2639–2653, https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207211006840
13.
WangTNooriMAltabeyWA. Identification of cracks in an Euler-Bernoulli beam using Bayesian inference and closed-form solution of vibration modes. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021; 235: 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420720969719
14.
GhabdianMAvalSBBNooriM, et al. Reliability of RC beams in serviceability limit state via microprestress-solidification theory, A structural health monitoring strategy. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021, In press, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pila (accepted in 05-Dec-2021)
15.
AvalSBBGhabdianMNooriM, et al. Simultaneous effect of temperature, shrinkage, and self-weight creep on RC beams: a case study. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021, In press, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pila (accepted in 01-Dec-2021)
16.
WinklerE. Theory of elasticity and strength. Dominicus Prague. 1867.
17.
FilippovAP. Steady-state vibrations of an infinite beam on elastic half-space subjected to a moving load. 1961.
18.
Filonenko-BorodichMM. A very simple model of an elastic foundation capable of spreading the load. Sb Tr Mosk ElektroInst Inzh Trans, 1945, Transzheldorizdat.
19.
PasternakPL. On a new method of an elastic foundation by means of two foundation constants. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Literaturi Po Stroitelstuve I Arkhitekture. 1954.
20.
BoussinesqJ. Application des potentiels à l’étude de l’équilibre et du mouvement des solides élastiques: principalement au calcul des déformations et des pressions que produisent, dans ces solides, des efforts quelconques exercés sur une petite partie de leur surface ou de leur intérieur: mémoire suivi de notes étendues sur divers points de physique, mathematique et d’analyse: Gauthier-Villars, 1885.
VlassovVZLeontievNN. Beams, plates and shells on elastic foundation, translated from Russian by Israel program for scientific translations, NIST No. N67-14238. 1966.
23.
VallabhanCVDasYC. Beams on elastic foundations: a new approach. Foundation engineering: current principles and practices. ASCE; 1989: 613–624.
24.
BasuDRaoN. Analytical solutions for Euler-Bernoulli beam on visco-elastic foundation subjected to moving load. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2013; 37: 945–960.
25.
JinB. Dynamic displacements of an infinite beam on a poroelastic half space due to a moving oscillating load. Arch Appl Mech. 2004; 74: 277–287.
26.
ChenHZBoHEDong-DongGE. Elastic-plastic analysis of foundation settlement caused by subway moving load. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol (Urban Science Edition). 2009.
27.
ChenRWanCFXueST, et al.Modification of motion equation of Timoshenko beam and its effect. J Tongji Univ. 2005; 23(6).
28.
BasuDKameswaraNSV, et al. Analytical solutions for Euler–Bernoulli beam on visco-elastic foundation subjected to moving load. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2013; 37(8): 945–960.
29.
ElhuniHBasuD. Dynamic soil structure interaction model for beams on viscoelastic foundations subjected to oscillatory and moving loads. Comput Geotech. 2019; 115: 103157.1–.14.
30.
FroioDRizziESimesF, et al.A true PML approach for steady-state vibration analysis of an elastically supported beam under moving load by a DLSFEM formulation. Comput Struct. 2020; 239: 106–295.
31.
LeeYHKimSS. Combined analytical and numerical solution for an elastically supported Timoshenko beam to a moving load. J Mech Sci Technol2014; 28: 2549–2559.
32.
MallikAKChandraSSinghAB. Steady-state response of an elastically supported infinite beam to a moving load. J Sound Vib. 2006; 291: 1148–1169.
33.
Wen-HaiHE. Modeling and simulation of vertical coupling vibration of tramcar railway. J China Coal Soc2012; 37: 224–8(5).
34.
YongAZPengRG. Dynamic response of an infinite beam on a transversely isotropic multilayered half-space due to a moving load. Int J Mech Sci. 2017; 133: 817–828.
35.
AiZYLiZX. Time-harmonic response of transversely isotropic multilayered half-space in a cylindrical coordinate system. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng2014; 28(7): 2549–2559.
36.
Filonenko-BorodichMM. Some approximate theories of the elastic foundation, Uchenyie Zapiski Moskovskogo Gosudarstuennogo Universiteta. Mekhanica1940; 46: 3–18.
37.
YuHYuanY. Analytical solution for an infinite Euler-Bernoulli beam on a viscoelastic foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads. J Eng Mech2014; 140: 542–551.
38.
YuHCaiCYuanY, et al.Analytical solutions for Euler-Bernoulli beam on Pasternak foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2017; 41: 1125–1137.
39.
WuJSShihPY. The dynamic behaviour of a finite railway under the high-speed multiple moving forces by using finite element method. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2010; 16: 851–866.
40.
EulerL. De curvis elasticis. In: Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas maximi minimive proprietate gaudentes, sive solutio problematis isoperimetrici lattissimo SensuAccepti. Bousquet, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 1744; 851–866.
41.
BeckerDE. Limit states design for foundations. Part II. Development for the national building code of Canada. Can Geotech J1996; 33: 984–1007.
