Dynamic response problem of the Timoshenko shear beam resting on the transversely isotropic viscoelastic foundation and subjected to a moving load is investigated. The extended Hamilton's principle is used to obtain the dynamic response equations of the beam-soil system. The corresponding partial differential equations are derived using variational principle. Using the analytical solutions, finite-element method, and central difference method, these differential equations are solved and mutually verified. The Newmark-β iterative algorithm is employed to decouple the dynamic equations of the beam-soil system. A modified two-parameter spring foundation model is used to simulate the dynamic characteristics of soil medium. Finite-element analysis demonstrates that the developed shear model of beam-soil is effective and accurate. Other numerical examples are carried out to analyze the effect of the shear beam, the load speed, and transverse isotropy of the dynamic medium model.
MorfidisK. Vibration of Timoshenko beams on three-parameter elastic foundation. Comput Struct2010; 88: 294–308.
2.
LiZFengDNooriM,et al.Dynamic response analysis of Euler-Bernoulli beam on spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic soil. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials Design and Applications2021. In press, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pila.
3.
LiZNooriMZhaoY,et al.A multi-objective optimization algorithm for Bouc–Wen–Baber–Noori model to identify reinforced concrete columns failing in different modes. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials Design and Applications2021; 235: 2165–2182.
4.
HuangMHThambiratnamDP. Dynamic response of plates on elastic foundation to moving loads. J Eng Mech2002; 128: 1016–1022.
5.
SelvaduraiA. Elastic analysis of soil-foundation interaction. Eng Geol1981; 17: 71.
6.
KerrAD. Elastic and viscoelastic foundation models. J Appl Mech1964; 31: 91.
7.
HePPCuiZD. Dynamic response of a thawing soil around the tunnel under the vibration load of subway. Environ Earth Sci2015; 73: 2473–2482.
8.
LiZNooriMAltabeyWA. An experimental study on the seismic performance of adobe walls. Struct Durability Health Monitor2020; 15: 103–123.
9.
HeW. Simulation research on coupling vibration of Tramcar-track. In: International conference on electronic computer technology, 2009, pp.644–648. DOI: 10.1109/ICECT.2009.119.
10.
Jong-ShyongWUShihPY. Dynamic responses of railway and carriage under the high-speed moving loads. J Sound Vib2000; 236: 61–87.
11.
WinklerE. Theory of elasticity and strength. Prague, Czechoslovakia: H. Domincus, 1867.
12.
Filonenko-BorodichMM. Some approximate theories of the elastic foundation. Uchenyie Zapiski Moskovskogo Gosudarstuennogo Universiteta, Mekhanica. 1940.
13.
Filonenko-BorodichMM. A very simple model of an elastic foundation capable of spreading the load. Sb Tr Mosk ElektroInst Inzh Trans, Transzheldorizdat. 1945.
14.
PasternakPL. On a new method of an elastic foundation by means of two foundation constants. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Literaturi Po Stroitelstuve I Arkhitekture, Moscow. 1954.
15.
HetenyiM. Beams on elastic foundation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1946, p.56.
16.
TerzaghiK. Evalution of conefficients of subgrade reaction. Géotechnique1955; 5: 297–326.
17.
PiccardoGTubinoF. Dynamic response of Euler-Bernoulli beams to resonant harmonic moving loads. Struct Eng Mech2012; 44: 681–704.
18.
HaldarSBasuD. Response of Euler–Bernoulli beam on spatially random elastic soil. Comput Geotech2013; 50: 110–128.
19.
VlassovVZLeontievNN. Beams, Plates and Shells on Elastic Foundation, translated from Russian by Israel program for scientific translations, NIST No. N67-14238. 1966.
20.
VallaabhanCVG. Dynamic analysis of infinite beam on modified vlasov subgrade – discussion. J Transport Eng-Asce1997; 123: 247–248.
21.
VallabhanCVGDasYC. Modified Vlasov model for beams on elastic foundations. J Geotech Eng-Asce1991; 117: 956–966.
22.
VallabhanCVDasYC. Beams on elastic foundations: a new approach. Foundation engineering: current principles and practices. ASCE1989; 117: 613–624.
23.
LiuQJMaJJ. Analytical model for beams on elastic foundations considering the coupling of horizontal and vertical displacements. J Eng Mech2013; 139: 1757–1768.
24.
MichellJH. The stress in an AEolotrophic elastic solid with an infinite plane boundary. London Math Soc1901; 32: 247–257.
25.
DahanMZarkaJ. Elastic contact between a sphere and a semi-infinite transversely isotropic body. Int J Solids Struct1977; 13: 229–238.
26.
ShahmohamadiMKhojastehARahimianM,et al.Axial soil-pile interaction in a transversely isotropic half-space. Int J Eng Sci2011; 49: 934–949.
27.
ShahmohamadiMKhojastehARahimianM,et al.Dynamics of a cylindrical pile in a transversely isotropic half-space under axial excitations. J Eng Mech2013; 139: 568–579.
28.
GharahiARahimianMEskandari-GhadiM,et al.Elastostatic response of a pile embedded in a transversely isotropic half-space under transverse loading. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2013; 37: 568–579.
29.
GharahiARahimianMEskandari-GhadiM,et al.Dynamic interaction of a pile with a transversely isotropic elastic half-space under transverse excitations. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51: 4082–4093.
30.
EulerL. De curvis elasticis. In: Methodus Inveniendi Lineas Curvas Maximi Minimive Proprietate Gaudentes, Sive Solutio Problematis Isoperimetrici Lattissimo SensuAccepti, Bousquet. 1744.
31.
TimoshenkoSP. On the corrections for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. Philos Mag1921; 41: 744–746.
32.
TimoshenkoSP. On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross section. Philos Mag1922; 43: 125–131.
33.
MallikAKChandraSSinghAB. Steady-state response of an elastically supported infinite beam to a moving load. J Sound Vib2006; 291: 1148–1169.
34.
LeeYHKimSS. Combined analytical and numerical solution for an elastically supported timoshenko beam to a moving load. J Mech Sci Technol2014; 28: 2549–2559.
35.
FroioDRizziESimoesFMF,et al.A true PML approach for steady-state vibration analysis of an elastically supported beam under moving load by a DLSFEM formulation. Comput Struct2020; 239: 2549–2559
36.
AiZYRenGP. Dynamic response of an infinite beam on a transversely isotropic multilayered half-space due to a moving load. Int J Mech Sci2017; 133: 817–828.
37.
ShiLSelvaduraiAPS. Dynamic response of an infinite beam supported by a saturated poroelastic halfspace and subjected to a concentrated load moving at a constant velocity. Int J Solids Struct2016; 88–89: 35–55.
38.
DingHShiKLChenLQ,et al.Dynamic response of an infinite timoshenko beam on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation to a moving load. Nonlinear Dyn2013; 73: 285–298.
39.
ElhuniHBasuD. Dynamic soil structure interaction model for beams on viscoelastic foundations subjected to oscillatory and moving loads. Comput Geotech2019; 115: 285–298 DOI: ARTN 103157 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103157
40.
KargarnovinMHAhmadianMTJafari-TalookolaeiRA. Dynamics of a delaminated Timoshenko beam subjected to a moving oscillatory mass. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2012; 40: 218–240.
41.
MackertichS. The response of an elastically supported infinite Timoshenko beam to a moving vibrating mass. J Acoust Soc Am1997; 101: 337–340.
42.
YuHCaiCYuanY,et al.Analytical solutions for Euler-Bernoulli beam on Pasternak foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2017; 41: 1125–1137.
43.
BasuDRaoNSVK. Analytical solutions for Euler-Bernoulli beam on visco-elastic foundation subjected to moving load. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2013; 37: 945–960.
44.
YuHTYuanY. Analytical solution for an infinite Euler-Bernoulli beam on a viscoelastic foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads. J Eng Mech2014; 140: 542–551.
45.
SenjanovicIVladimirN. Physical insight into Timoshenko beam theory and its modification with extension. Struct Eng Mech2013; 48: 519–545.
46.
WangTNooriMAltabeyWA,et al.Parameter identification and dynamic response analysis of a modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii asymmetric hysteresis model via least-mean square algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2021; 53: 400–418.
47.
JinB. Dynamic displacements of an infinite beam on a poroelastic half space due to a moving oscillating load. Arch Appl Mech2004; 74: 277–287.
48.
AiZYLiuWJShiBK. Quasi-static interaction between non-uniform beams and anisotropic permeable saturated multilayered soils with elastic superstrata. Appl Math Model2017; 53: 400–418.
