This work mainly focuses on designing a novel aluminum alloy 6061-T6 pressure vessel liner intended for use in launch vehicles. Fabrication of custom-made welding fixtures for the assembly of liner parts, namely two hemispherical domes and end boss, is illustrated. The parts of the liner are joined using the cold metal transfer welding process, and the welding trials are performed to arrive at an optimized parametric range. The metallurgical characterization of weld joint reveals the existence of dendritic structures (equiaxed and columnar). Microhardness of base and weld metal was 70 and 65 HV, respectively. The tensile strength of base and weld metal was 290 and 197 MPa, respectively, yielding a joint efficiency of 68%. Finite-element analysis of a uniaxial tensile test was performed to predict the tensile strength and location of the fracture in base and weld metal. The experimental and predicted tensile test results were found to be in good agreement.
LeeYJAhmedHLeeJR. Filament-wound composite pressure vessel inspection based on rotational through-transmission laser ultrasonic propagation imaging. Compos Struct2020; 236: 111871.
2.
AlmeidaJHSFariaHMarquesAT,et al.Load sharing ability of the liner in type III composite pressure vessels under internal pressure. J Reinf Plast Compos2014; 33: 2274–2286.
3.
Tam W, Debreceni M, Hersh M, et al. Low cost derivative tanks for spacecraft and launch vehicles. In: 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Los Angeles, California, 20–24 June 1999, pp. 1–37.
Radtke W. Manufacturing and testing of advanced over- wrapped propellant tanks and high pressure vessel. In: Proceedings of the European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and mechanical testing, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 10-12 May 2005, pp. 6.1–6.7.
6.
Kawahara G and McClesky SF. Titanium lined, carbon composite overwrapped pressure vessel. In: 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 01-03 July 1996, pp. 1–10.
7.
YahrG. Prevention of non-ductile fracture in 6061-T6 aluminum nuclear pressure vessels. J Press Vessel Technol1995; 119: 150–156.
8.
Khawand G, Loibl B, Nissen D, et al. Design and qualification of a single tank for dual applications: Helium pressurant or xenon propellant. In: 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Las Vegas, Nevada, 24-28 July 2000, pp. 1–11.
9.
MuraiK. Integrated cryogenic helium system for extended duration balloon flights. Adv Sp Res2004; 33: 1819–1824.
10.
PramodRKrishnadasanCKShanmugamNS. Design and finite element analysis of metal-elastomer lined composite over wrapped spherical pressure vessel. Compos Struct2019; 224: 111028.
11.
Pramod R, Shanmugam NS, Krishnadasan CK, et al. Finite element analysis of potential liner failures during operation in spherical pressure vessel. In: Narayanan R, Joshi S, Dixit U (eds) Advances in computational methods in manufacturing. Lecture notes on multidisciplinary industrial engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 1073–1087.
12.
Tam W, Wlodarczyk K and Kawahara G. Additive manufactured pressure vessel shell. In: Space propulsion, Seville, Spain, 14 – 18 May 2018, pp. 1–5.
13.
LinZSongKYuX. A review on wire and arc additive manufacturing of titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol2021; 70: 24–45.
14.
LeeHSYoonJHParkJS,et al.A study on failure characteristic of spherical pressure vessel. J Mater Process Technol2005; 164: 882–888.
15.
Babel H and Grimes-Ledesma L. Delta IV COPV risk mitigation. In: 35th joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Los Angeles, California, 20-24 June 1999, pp. 1–12.
16.
Balch DK, Goods SH and San MC. Fabrication and testing of electron beam welded alloy AA2219 aluminum pressure vessels for high-pressure hydrogen service. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 pressure vessels & piping conference, Anaheim, California, 20-24 July 2014, pp. 1–9.
PangJHuSShenJ,et al.Arc characteristics and metal transfer behavior of CMT + P welding process. J Mater Process Technol2016; 238: 212–217.
19.
KumarSMShanmugamNS. Finite element simulation for tensile and impact test of activated TIG welding of AISI 321 austenitic stainless steel. Proc IMechE, Part L: J. Materials Design and Applications2019; 233: 2323–2334.
20.
Chandran VB, Tiwari SB, Suresh R, et al. Design and analysis of composite overwrapped pressure vessel. In: Proceedings of the international conference on materials for the future—Innovative materials, processes, products and applications, Thrissur, Kerala, 06-08 November 2013, pp. 109–114.
21.
TschaetschH. Metal forming practise. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006, p. 142.
22.
NieFDongHChenS, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of pulse MIG welded 6061/A356 aluminum alloy dissimilar butt joints. J Mater Sci Technol2018; 34: 551–560.
23.
ElrefaeyA. Effectiveness of cold metal transfer process for welding 7075 aluminium alloys. Sci Technol Weld Join2015; 20: 280–285.
24.
ASTM Standard E8/E8M-16ae1. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016.
25.
PandaSKSreenivasanNKuntzML, et al.Numerical simulations and experimental results of tensile test behavior of laser butt welded DP980 steels. J Eng Mater Technol2008; 130: 041003.
26.
VasanthBRoshanPGoelS, et al.Experimental and XFEM simulation of tensile and fracture behavior of al 6061 alloy processed by severe plastic deformation. Metallogr Microstruct Anal2017; 1: 55–72.
27.
ReisgenUSchleserMMokrovO, et al.Numerical and experimental investigation of tensile behavior of laser beam welded TRIP700 steel. ISIJ Int2011; 51: 429–434.
