The main objective of this work is, by using cohesive zone modelling, to compute the fracture toughness behaviour in mode I of unidirectional carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic subjected to an impact load at 4.7 m/s. To perform this task, double-cantilever beam specimens were simulated, with its opening displacement and crack propagation being assessed, as well as the evolution of strain rate through the test. Therefore, by plotting the crack propagation, it was possible to calculate the fracture toughness in mode I (GIC). A comparison of the numerical results with experimental tests previously performed by using a drop weight falling-wedge impact test equipment was made, allowing to infer that the numerical approach, based on a triangular cohesive zone modelling, is capable to predict the behaviour of such specimens under impact, accurately obtain GIC, and to determine the value of strain rate achieved through the test.
JacobGC, et al.The effect of loading rate on the fracture toughness of fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Appl Polym Sci2005; 96: 899–904.
5.
BouetteBCazeneuveCOytanaC. Effect of strain rate on interlaminar shear properties of carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 45: 313–321.
6.
Al-ZubaidyHZhaoX-LAl-MahaidiR. Mechanical characterisation of the dynamic tensile properties of CFRP sheet and adhesive at medium strain rates. Compos Struct2013; 96: 153–164.
7.
HsiaoHDanielI. Strain rate behavior of composite materials. Compos Part B: Eng1998; 29: 521–533.
8.
GilatAGoldbergRKRobertsGD. Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1469–1476.
9.
BlackmanB, et al.The failure of fibre composites and adhesively bonded fibre composites under high rates of test. J Mater Sci1995; 30: 5885–5900.
10.
CantwellWBlytonM. Influence of loading rate on the interlaminar fracture properties of high performance composites-A review. Appl Mech Rev1999; 52: 199–212.
11.
SohnMHuX. Impact and high strain rate delamination characteristics of carbon fibre epoxy composites. Theoret Appl Fract Mech1996; 25: 17–29.
12.
MayM. Measuring the rate-dependent mode I fracture toughness of composites–A review. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2016; 81: 1–12.
13.
O’BrienTK. Interlaminar fracture toughness: the long and winding road to standardization. Compos Part B: Eng1998; 29: 57–62.
14.
HugG, et al.Effect of the loading rate on mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of laminated composites. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73: 2456–2462.
15.
Kalthoff J, et al. On the determination of the crack arrest toughness. In: ICF4, Waterloo, Canada, 1977.
16.
KusakaT, et al.Rate dependence of mode I fracture behaviour in carbon-fibre/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 591–602.
17.
SridharN, et al.Delamination dynamics in through-thickness reinforced laminates with application to DCB specimen. Int J Fract2002; 118: 119–144.
18.
HeimbsS, et al.Low velocity impact on CFRP plates with compressive preload: test and modelling. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 1182–1193.
19.
Heimbs S, Heller S and Middendorf P. Simulation of low velocity impact on composite plates with compressive preload. In: 7th German LS-DYNA forum, Bamberg, Germany, September 2008.
20.
Juntikka R and Olsson R. Experimental and modelling study of hail impact on composite plates. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference of composite materials, Edinburgh, 27–31 July 2009.
21.
CampilhoRDDe MouraMDominguesJ. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1948–1958.
22.
MachadoJ, et al.Mode I fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature and strain rate. J Compos Mater2016; 51: 3315–3326.
23.
CampilhoRD, et al.Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes2013; 44: 48–56.
24.
AmaroA, et al.The influence of the boundary conditions on low‐velocity impact composite damage. Strain2011; 47: e220–e226.
25.
MachadoJ, et al.Dynamic behaviour in mode I fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature. Theoret Appl Fract Mech2019.
26.
MachadoJJM, et al.Mode II fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature and strain rate. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 114: 311–318.
27.
ISO B, 15024: 2001. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites. Determination of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectional reinforced materials. BSI, 2002.
28.
YamagataY, et al.Experimental investigation of mode I fracture energy of adhesively bonded joints under impact loading conditions. Appl Adhes Sci2017; 5: 7–7.
29.
MachadoJ, et al.Numerical study of the behaviour of composite mixed adhesive joints under impact strength for the automotive industry. Compos Struct2018; 185: 373–380.
30.
FernandesRCampilhoR. Numerical evaluation of dissimilar cohesive models to predict the behavior of Double-Cantilever Beam specimens. Procedia Struct Integr2016; 1: 42–49.
