This work presents finite element ductile tearing simulation and experimental validation of a piping system with a circumferential surface cracked (SC) A106 Gr. B pipe under simulated seismic loading condition. The damage model for simulation is based on the multiaxial fracture strain energy. The parameters in the damage model are determined from tensile and fracture toughness test results under the monotonic loading condition. For the system dynamic time history analysis, the Rayleigh damping model is employed. For cyclic constitutive equations, two models were considered to confirm its sensitivity. Predicted crack initiation and ductile tearing agree well with the experimental results.
GursonAL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth – Part 1: yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol1977; 99: 2–15.
2.
TvergaardV. Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract1981; 17: 389–407.
3.
BorstR. Numerical aspects of cohesive-zone models. Eng Fract Mech2003; 70: 1743–1757.
4.
ScheiderIBrocksW. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech2003; 70: 1943–1961.
5.
OhCSKimNHKimYJet al.A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model. Eng Fract Mech2011; 78: 124–137.
6.
NamHSOhYRKimYJet al.Application of engineering ductile tearing simulation method to CRIPEI pipe test. Eng Fract Mech2016; 153: 128–142.
7.
SherryAHWilkesMA. Numerical simulation of tearing-fatigue interactions in 316l(N) austenitic stainless steel. Int J Press Vess Piping2005; 82: 905–916.
8.
KlingbeilDSvendsenBReuschF. Gurson-based modelling of ductile damage and failure during cyclic loading processes at large deformation. Eng Fract Mech2016; 160: 95–123.
9.
KhoeiAREghbalianMAzadiHet al.Numerical simulation of ductile crack growth under cyclic and dynamic loading with a damage-viscoplasticity model. Eng Fract Mech2013; 99: 169–190.
10.
NamHSLeeJMYounGGet al.Simulation of ductile fracture toughness test under monotonic and reverse cyclic loading. Int J Mech Sci2018; 135: 609–620.
11.
NamHSLeeJMKimYJet al.Numerical ductile fracture prediction of circumferential through-wall cracked pipes under very low cycle fatigue loading condition. Eng Fract Mech2018; 194: 175–189.
ABAQUS Version 6.13. User’s manual. Inc., and Dassault Systemes, 2013.
14.
Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2007.
15.
NamHSKimYJKimJWet al.Energy-based numerical modelling of the strain rate effect on fracture toughness of SA508 Gr. 1a. J Strain Analysis2017; 52: 177–189.
16.
Armstrong PJ and Frederick CO. A mathematical representation of the multiaxial bauschinger effect, CEGB Report No. RD/B/N 731, London, UK, 1966.
17.
Chaboche JL, Dang-Van K and Cordier G. Modelization of the strain memory effect on the cyclic hardening of 316 stainless steel. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on SMiRT, Div. L, 1979.
18.
ChabocheJL. On some modifications of kinematic hardening to improve the description of ratcheting effects. Int J Plast1991; 7: 661–667.
19.
ChabocheJL. Modeling of ratcheting: evaluation of various approaches. Eur J Mech A/Solids1994; 13: 501–518.
20.
BariSHassanT. An advancement in cyclic plasticity modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation. Int J Plastic2002; 18: 873–894.
21.
BariSHassanT. Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation. Int J Plast2000; 16: 381–409.
