A combined analytical and experimental approach is introduced to estimate the dynamic response of complex systems from a limited number of measurements. The method is based on the concept that modal information is sufficient to extrapolate the complete map of the response from experimental data through the reconstruction of modal loads. The capabilities of the algorithm are first verified via well-controlled lab experiments on a thin-walled aluminium-rotor blade. Numerical results from a comprehensive UH-60 multibody model are then compared with available experimental data. Significant improvements in the accuracy of the predicted results are achieved when simple airloads models are employed as inputs.
PezeratC.GuyaderJ. L.Force analysis technique: reconstruction of force distribution on plates. Acustica – Acta Acust., 2000, 86, 322–332.
2.
WangB.-T.Prediction of impact and harmonic forces acting on arbitrary structures: theoretical formulation. Mech. Syst. and Signal Process., 2002, 16(6), 935–953.
3.
Oosterhuis, E. J., Eidhof, W. B., vander Hoogt, P. J. M., and de Boer, A. Force prediction via the inverse FRF using experimental and numerical data from a demonstrator with tunable nonlinearities. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Sound and vibration (ICSV-13) (Eds J. Eberhardsteiner, H. A. Maug, and H. Wavbke), Wien, Austria, 2–6 July 2006, pp. 1–8.
4.
LiuY.ShepardW. S.An improved method for the reconstruction of a distributed force acting on a vibrating structure. J. Sound Vibration, 2006, 291, 369–387.
5.
JiangX. Q.HuH. Y.Reconstruction of distributed dynamic loads on a thin plate via mode-selection and consistent spatial expression. J. Sound Vibration, 2008, 323, 626–644.
6.
Tessler, A. and Spangler, J. L. Inverse fem for fullfield reconstruction of elastic deformations in shear deformable plates and shells. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Structural health monitoring, 2004, Munich, Germany, 7–9 July 2004, pp. 83–92.
7.
TesslerA.Structural analysis methods for structural health management of future aerospace vehicles. NASA/TM-2007-214871, 2007.
8.
AmbrosioJ. A. C.KecskemethyA.Multibody dynamics of biomechanical models for human motion via optimization. In Multibody dynamics (computational methods and applications), 1st edition, 2007, (Dordrecht, Springer).
9.
CappozzoA.CataniF.LeardiniA.BenedettiM. G.Della CrceU.Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin. Biomech., 1996, 11(2), 90–100.
10.
AndersenM. S.BenitD. L.DamsgaardM.RamseyD. K.RasmussenJ.Do kinematicmodels reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics. J. Biomech., 2010, 43, 268–273.
11.
AlonsoF. J.Del CastilloJ. M.PintadoP.Motion data processing and wobbling mass modelling in the inverse dynamics of skeletal models. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2007, 42, 1153–1169.
12.
BousmanW. G.Estimation of blade airloads from rotor blade bending moments. NASA TM 100020,, 1987.
BousmanW.An investigation of helicopter rotor blade flap vibratory loads. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 48th Annual Forum, 1992Washington, DC, USA, 3–5 June 1992, pp. 977–999.
15.
HowlettJ. J.UH-60A Black Hawk engineering simulation program: Vol. i - mathematical model. NASA CR-166309,, 1981.
16.
BauchauO.LiuH.On the modeling of hydraulic components in rotorcraft systems. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2006, 51(2), 175–184.
17.
KufeldR. M.BaloughD. L.CrossJ. L.StudebakerK. F.JennisonC. D.BousmanW. G.Flight testing of the UH-60A aircraft. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 50th Annual Forum, 1994Washington, DC, USA, 11–13 May 1994.
